Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:02 am

Post the rule, Dwarf.

If you can’t show the gun in pieces (your words) we are done here.

Epic fail on your end.  And you did not hijack someone else’s thread to do it.

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:04 am

If you can’t show the gun in pieces (your words) we are done here.

Epic fail on your end.  And you did not hijack someone else’s thread to do it.

Dwarf,

Another episode wherein you have run from EVERY question. 

Every single one.

I keep hearing "underwear pic"..


:die:  

 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:08 am

Dwarf,

Another episode wherein you have run from EVERY question. 

Every single one.

I keep hearing "underwear pic"..

Scrawny,

Another episode where you got busted not knowing what you are talking about and displaying your inability to formulate a case. 

I answered you the first time.  There is no gun in pieces in the pic.  A magazine is not a gun.  There is a holster and a spare magazine.  There was no need for your questions because you were attempting to reframe. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 9:23 am

damn, are you stupid.



is that a gun, in pieces..

and the bed unmade?

been spankin'?

No, that is not a gun in pieces.  That is a holster and a spare magazine.

That is the only question that needs to be answered.

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:17 am

No, that is not a gun in pieces.  That is a holster and a spare magazine.

That is the only question that needs to be answered.

How do we know it's a spare?

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:12 am

Scrawny,

Another episode where you got busted not knowing what you are talking about and displaying your inability to formulate a case. 

I answered you the first time.  There is no gun in pieces in the pic.  A magazine is not a gun.  There is a holster and a spare magazine.  There was no need for your questions because you were attempting to reframe.

Reframe from what?

This extended meltdown?

Perhaps it's time you posted the thread title.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:25 am

How do we know it's a spare?

you want proof?  

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:27 am

Reframe from what?

This extended meltdown?

Perhaps it's time you posted the thread title.

 
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:28 am

you want proof?

No...an answer.


The second time.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:29 am

No...an answer.

The second time.

Because most semi automatic come from the manufacturer with TWO magazines, ****.  You didn’t know that?  Jeez, I’m dealing with an idiot

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:33 am

Because most semi automatic come from the manufacturer with TWO magazines, ****.  You didn’t know that?  Jeez, I’m dealing with an idiot

No...

Read the question, and then answer that question.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:25 am

How do we know it's a spare?

Because the other one, that also came from the manufacturer, is in the firearm.  

You are going to have to offer some narrative on exactly what answer you are looking for.

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:40 am

Because the other one, that also came from the manufacturer, is in the firearm.  

You are going to have to offer some narrative on exactly what answer you are looking for.

How does anyone looking at the picture know that?


How difficult can this be?

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:42 am

How does anyone looking at the picture know that?

How difficult can this be?

You are reaching.  As I said I can offer proof.  Now kindly point out the gun in pieces (your words).  Or admit there isn’t one in the pic.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:42 am

How does anyone looking at the picture know that?

How difficult can this be?

Something else you don’t know is whether or not that is really a magazine for a 9 mill plus.  But  what we do know is there is not a gun in pieces (your words) in that pic.

What else you got?  

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:55 am

Something else you don’t know is whether or not that is really a magazine for a 9 mill plus.  But  what we do know is there is not a gun in pieces (your words) in that pic.

What else you got?

Else?

I haven't gotten an answer to this yet.


How would anyone know it is a 'spare'?
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 11:44 am

You are reaching.  As I said I can offer proof.  Now kindly point out the gun in pieces (your words).  Or admit there isn’t one in the pic.

Then tell me how anyone looking at the picture can tell it is a spare..

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm

Then tell me how anyone looking at the picture can tell it is a spare..

All they have to do is ask.  And anyone looking at the picture can tell there is no gun in pieces (your words) in the pic.  

Whether or not it is a spare is not relevant to your words,
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2022, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2022, 12:05 pm

All they have to do is ask.  And anyone looking at the picture can tell there is no gun in pieces (your words) in the pic.  

Whether or not it is a spare is not relevant to your words,

All they have to do is ask

like "is that a gun, in pieces.."

But they WOULDN'T know FROM LOOKING AT IT.

Whether or not it is a spare is not relevant to your words,

What if it ISN'T a spare?


DMA...
 

Which brings us back to....


The Good News? They're Done Whelpin'