Answered months, if not a year ago.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ I have been waiting for an answer to this question for a couple of years now:
Did Jan 2020 come BEFORE or AFTER Feb 2020?
When it gets to be that long THEN you can bitch about it.![]()
Then the answer was Before meaning you lost YOUR challenge. Now get to work on that thread announcing your loss with no **** or excuses.Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2022, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑Answered months, if not a year ago.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ I have been waiting for an answer to this question for a couple of years now:
Did Jan 2020 come BEFORE or AFTER Feb 2020?
When it gets to be that long THEN you can bitch about it.![]()
Your **** recall is not my problem.
No, it doesn't.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Then the answer was Before meaning you lost YOUR challenge. Now get to work on that thread announcing your loss with no **** or excuses.
Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑No, it doesn't.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Then the answer was Before meaning you lost YOUR challenge. Now get to work on that thread announcing your loss with no **** or excuses.
You can't reason.
Because you're a moron.
@BlackvegetableHuey » 02 May 2022, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑The challenge:Blackvegetable » 02 May 2022, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ The issue was he was pumping a poster for info on her occupation, went to school, hammering her for what he thought may have been her weight, etc. WHat he does here. I told her don't give him any info because he will use it later to divert an debate. In a nutshell he denied he did that
I challenge you to deny that these are your words
You lose.
Huey » 12 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I remember perfectly well.
It was incidental to something you called The Issue.
Do you recall what The Issue was?
It's about what YOU defined as The Issue.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
That was complete. You lose. There is one more. Wait for it.
Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑It's about what YOU defined as The Issue.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
That was complete. You lose. There is one more. Wait for it.
It has nothing to do with my words, or what YOU defined as the challenge.
Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ I define didn't the challenge. You did. Now admit you lost it. I posted your words. the challenge is the issue. Always has been. As my entire quote you refuse to post says.
Are issues on this forum concerning the challenge were always about you being a ****** concerning a challenge you lost.
No, ****..I define didn't the challenge. You did.
The Issue was
I have already posted that entire quote. It is about the challenge YOU LOST. Always has been. Let me now when you admit you lost that challenge and we can then discuss your other issues.Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ I define didn't the challenge. You did. Now admit you lost it. I posted your words. the challenge is the issue. Always has been. As my entire quote you refuse to post says.
Are issues on this forum concerning the challenge were always about you being a ****** concerning a challenge you lost.No, ****..I define didn't the challenge. You did.
But it doesn't matter.
This is about YOUR definition of The Issue, which we know to be YOUR definition of The Issue because YOU postedThe Issue was
Tiny,Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ I have already posted that entire quote. It is about the challenge YOU LOST. Always has been. Let me now when you admit you lost that challenge and we can then discuss your other issues.
Don't ever accuse another poster of running from his words. This will be brought up. And don't ever try to challenge another poster. You are not man enough to honor your end when you lose.
The issue was.....
FIFY.Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2022, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ I have already posted that entire quote. [t is about the challenge YOU LOST. Always has been. Let me now when you admit you lost that challenge and we can then discuss your other issues.
Don't ever accuse another poster of running from his words. This will be brought up. And don't ever try to challenge another poster. You are not man enough to honor your end when you lose.The issue was.....
You almost never post with such clarity.
Because the only part of the quote which is relevant to defining The Issue is that which defines The Issue...Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ FIFY.
You are still afraid to post the entire quote. LMAO!
You lost. And won't admit it.
Well, admit you lost the challenge, which was the issue, and then we will get to your diversion. Whatever point you think you are making does not erase your words and the challenge you lost.Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑Because the only part of the quote which is relevant to defining The Issue is that which defines The Issue...Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ FIFY.
You are still afraid to post the entire quote. LMAO!
You lost. And won't admit it.
That is an ontological impossibility.Huey » 19 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, admit you lost the challenge, which was the issue, and then we will get to your diversion. Whatever point you think you are making does not erase your words and the challenge you lost.
BV, where is the gun in pieces?Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ damn, are you stupid.
is that a gun, in pieces..
and the bed unmade?
been spankin'?
I'm sure this is not a star date.
Go ahead acknowledge the objective fact that there is no gun in pieces in the photo.
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ damn, are you stupid.
is that a gun, in pieces..
and the bed unmade?
been spankin'?