I just destroyed your last post.Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
Your tortured notions of how things work notwithstanding, you lost that Yuge..
G'damn are you **** stupid.Huey » 08 Aug 2021, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Not according to the OP ED your judge wrote.
On May 11, 2020, Gleeson co-authored an op-ed concerning the Department of Justice's request to drop charges against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn; the op-ed pointed out that dismissal of charges was not automatic but would only be granted by leave of the court.[10] Two days later, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan appointed Gleeson to present arguments against the DOJ’s request to withdraw the case against Flynn and to determine if perjury charges should be brought against Flynn. In the role, Gleeson will serve as "friend of the court."[11][12]
You are dismissed.
Post the Pic!
It was because he had a hard on for Flynn and he was an anti trumper. DOJ dropped the charges.Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ G'damn are you **** stupid.
That is the legal principle under which Sullivan was not obliged to accept a Motion to Dismiss.
It is exactly because this was NOT routine that he was engaged.
Gleeson is a former federal prosecutor.
you were wrong again...Huey » 08 Aug 2021, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ It was because he had a hard on for Flynn and he was an anti trumper. DOJ dropped the charges.
Post the Pic!
Yeah I can read. I had to explain the motion to you, you had one biased judge support Flynn, and the motion was never heard.Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ you were wrong again...
You can't read, and don't know ****.
Huey » 08 Aug 2021, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah I can read. I had to explain the motion to you, you had one biased judge support Flynn, and the motion was never heard.
Post the Pic!
what did you explain, Verbal?I had to explain the motion to you,
you had one biased judge support Flynn,
They are either granted, or not.and the motion was never heard.
Yea....the guy who pleaded to two counts to avoid a capital charge is the victim here..Huey » 08 Aug 2021, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ It was because he had a hard on for Flynn and he was an anti trumper. DOJ dropped the charges.
Post the Pic!
Turned out he was the victim. Going broke, and they were threatening to go after his son. He did the honorable thing. Honor is something you would not understand. Your dad’s honorable traits skipped a generation.Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Yea....the guy who pleaded to two counts to avoid a capital charge is the victim here..
Your opinion is noted....and laughed at.
Damn, I had seven notifications. 4 from you. Troll much?Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ what did you explain, Verbal?
Failure to respond with specifics is an admission that you are a liar.
Goat pepper spray.
They are either granted, or not.
I predicted that this would be unprecedented..
I was right on every single count, you on none
Answer the question, Nauseating Little Coward..
That's was shown to be utter ****.Huey » 08 Aug 2021, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Turned out he was the victim. Going broke, and they were threatening to go after his son. He did the honorable thing. Honor is something you would not understand. Your dad’s honorable traits skipped a generation.
For what?they were threatening to go after his son.
Honor is standing by your word, Sheilagh.He did the honorable thing. Honor is something you would not understand.
Your words. So no demand was made. Post the pic!Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2021, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑Super..Huey » 12 Jul 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑
No pic, no proof. Tell you what. I will take a YEAR off if you provide the pic described above.
I'll post it when I find it..
You will know it by the thread title
Ce N'est Pas Une Plage!
Count the Levels!
Now!
no...seriously..So no demand was made. Post the pic!
BumpBlackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Answer the question, Nauseating Little Coward..
what did you explain, Verbal?
Failure to respond with specifics is an admission that you are a liar.
Post the pic!
Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2021, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑Answer the question, Nauseating Little Coward..
what did you explain, Verbal?
Failure to respond with specifics is an admission that you are a liar.
No demands, Tiny.
Another double coward..Huey » 09 Aug 2021, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ Failure to post the pic is an admission you are a liar!![]()
![]()
Post the pic!
Huey » 09 Aug 2021, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑Your words. So no demand was made. Post the pic!Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2021, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑Super..Huey » 12 Jul 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑
No pic, no proof. Tell you what. I will take a YEAR off if you provide the pic described above.
I'll post it when I find it..
You will know it by the thread title
Ce N'est Pas Une Plage!
Count the Levels!
Now!
Your words, Scrawny Data Geek!
no demands, TinyPost the pic!