Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2021, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2021, 10:41 am

No, Verbal.

There are Rules.

Noted.  

Huey » 09 Aug 2021, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2021, 10:43 am

Noted.

How long have you been staring at words wondering how they work?

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 7:42 am

Goodnees, the curbstompings I have have given you the past few years have sent you over the edge.

1)   

2) go look at the shot you posted of yourself on the beach...same tunic.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:37 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am

I have never posted a pic of myself on the beach.  You will have to post that.

This isn’t the first time you have mixed up what others have posted.

F'n A.

Your wife is in the background, slightly elevated on a dune..

You're in profile, flexing flab
 

 

Speaking of honesty an integrity.

Still no pic!

Huey » 13 Aug 2021, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2021, 10:12 am

Speaking of honesty an integrity.

Still no pic!

Day 32.....or 34, of your bitter vigil?

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2021, 11:07 am

Day 32.....or 34, of your bitter vigil?

Lost count zerointegrity. 

Huey » 13 Aug 2021, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2021, 11:48 am

Lost count zerointegrity.

That's recent.....

You were zeroed in on your month anniversary...

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm

Vegasgiants » 10 Jul 2021, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2021, 8:32 pm

This is what meth can do to a woman in 2 years

The dude could be @Huey  's younger, more vigorous, sibling....

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 7:42 am

Goodnees, the curbstompings I have have given you the past few years have sent you over the edge.

1)   

2) go look at the shot you posted of yourself on the beach...same tunic.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:37 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am

I have never posted a pic of myself on the beach.  You will have to post that.

This isn’t the first time you have mixed up what others have posted.

F'n A.

Your wife is in the background, slightly elevated on a dune..

You're in profile, flexing flab
 

 

Here ya go BV.  

Huey » 19 Aug 2021, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Aug 2021, 2:40 pm

Here ya go BV.

Why does this merit 60 days of hysteria?

Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2021, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Aug 2021, 2:45 pm

Why does this merit 60 days of hysteria?

In my time....

     

 

Huey » 19 Aug 2021, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Aug 2021, 2:49 pm

In my time....

   

Then simmer in it..


Now THERE'S an incentive.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 7:42 am

Goodnees, the curbstompings I have have given you the past few years have sent you over the edge.

1)   

2) go look at the shot you posted of yourself on the beach...same tunic.

 

 

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am

1)   

2) go look at the shot you posted of yourself on the beach...same tunic.

I have never posted a pic of myself on the beach.  You will have to post that.

This isn’t the first time you have mixed up what others have posted.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:37 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am

I have never posted a pic of myself on the beach.  You will have to post that.

This isn’t the first time you have mixed up what others have posted.

F'n A.

Your wife is in the background, slightly elevated on a dune..

You're in profile, flexing flab
 

 

Still no pic....

Huey » 08 Sep 2021, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 7:37 am

Still no pic....

Simmer on.....

Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2021, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 7:39 am

Huey » 08 Sep 2021, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 7:37 am

Still no pic....

Simmer on.....

 

No need.  Although I have drastically cut my posting it is still fun to laugh at you and your lies. 

Huey » 08 Sep 2021, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 7:44 am

No need.  Although I have drastically cut my posting it is still fun to laugh at you and your lies.

Gives you more time to think about who decimated the military.....

Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2021, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 7:49 am

Gives you more time to think about who decimated the military.....

I already did.

The modern day definition:

kill, destroy, or remove a large percentage or part of.
"the project would decimate the fragile wetland wilderness"

The historical definition:

2.
HISTORICAL
kill one in every ten of (a group of soldiers or others) as a punishment for the whole group.
"the man who is to determine whether it be necessary to decimate a large body of mutineers"

'nuff said!

I have told you this before.  But you lost that discussion so you in the retelling you are lying. 
 
 

Huey » 08 Sep 2021, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 7:52 am

I already did.

The modern day definition:

kill, destroy, or remove a large percentage or part of.
"the project would decimate the fragile wetland wilderness"

The historical definition:

2.
HISTORICAL
kill one in every ten of (a group of soldiers or others) as a punishment for the whole group.
"the man who is to determine whether it be necessary to decimate a large body of mutineers"

'nuff said!

I have told you this before.  But you lost that discussion so you in the retelling you are lying.

That's not an "argument"...that is 2 cherry picked definitions.

And you remain wrong by both......

We went through the numbers - you embarrassed yourself, predictably.

Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2021, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 8:30 am

That's not an "argument"...that is 2 cherry picked definitions.

And you remain wrong by both......

We went through the numbers - you embarrassed yourself, predictably.

Nope.  Decimate has evolved to mean a large percentage or to the point you lose effectiveness.  I was correct.  You have to cherry pick to make a point.  That is why you refuse to discuss it on the original thread. 

You lost.  

Now, you have a pic to find.  Or admit you lied.  

Huey » 08 Sep 2021, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 8:35 am

Nope.  Decimate has evolved to mean a large percentage or to the point you lose effectiveness.  I was correct.  You have to cherry pick to make a point.  That is why you refuse to discuss it on the original thread. 

You lost.  

Now, you have a pic to find.  Or admit you lied.
 

 

Decimate has evolved to mean

**** idiot.

25% is 25%......less than 10% is - you'll never guess....

You have to cherry pick to make a point.

No...We went over the numbers in detail.....you repeatedly shat yourself..

Before losing.

Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2021, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 8:48 am

**** idiot.

25% is 25%......less than 10% is - you'll never guess....

No...We went over the numbers in detail.....you repeatedly shat yourself..

Before losing.

If you are using the historical definition. Maybe if you made your argument from the get go we could have straightened out your cherry picking from the get go.  But you didn't.  When you got yourself in a bind you decided to use the historical definition.  You lose.


You may have the last word then go find that pic.        

 

Huey » 08 Sep 2021, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2021, 8:52 am

If you are using the historical definition. Maybe if you made your argument from the get go we could have straightened out your cherry picking from the get go.  But you didn't.  When you got yourself in a bind you decided to use the historical definition.  You lose.

You may have the last word then go find that pic.      
 

If you are using the historical definition. Maybe if you made your argument from the get go we could have straightened out your cherry picking from the get go.  But you didn't.  When you got yourself in a bind you decided to use the historical definition.  You lose.

You are wrong by each of your definitions...

"Decimate" isn't what you "feel" it is......

How many decimations in a 25% reduction?