I only agree with the part about people putting religion over science is just plain stupid.Vegasgiants » 11 Jul 2021, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ But you do agree this is what the conversation should be about on this thread.....yes?
No, no, no..Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I told you what I would do.
The picture on a beach does not exist.
And no, I just verified my account of your Pheiffer debacle which will be discussed on the thread where it occurred.
who was POTUS in 2008?Vegas » 11 Jul 2021, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I only agree with the part about people putting religion over science is just plain stupid.
Any part about conservatives being stupid is no more that childish opinions that is unsupported. Therefore, it is dismissed.
No, ******, you made the accusation. Back it up. I get to set the terms.Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No, no, no..
If I do the work, I set the compensation..
Besides, it doesn't make a difference..
You have zerointegrity.
You can post about it. However, I have a right to only post the "facts" in OPs. That is valid debating. I will address the factual part of the OP.Vegasgiants » 11 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ So you dont agree that in general posts should follow what is said in the op?
Tell you what. You permenantly leave the forum and I will accept your conditions.Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, you just confirmed MY account.
When I locate that photo, you'll take 3 days off for being wrong, 6 months for lying, and another year for being a hypocrite and coward.
This is all I needed to hear. Thank you.Vegasgiants » 11 Jul 2021, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes you can talk about fact or opinion related to the op. Fine with me.
Only marginally less sensible than your last offer..Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell you what. You permenantly leave the forum and I will accept your conditions.
The picture has to be EXACTLY as you described it. On a beach, with my wife on a dune, slightly above me, and me flexing flam in profile.
Why don't we move directly to the part where you explain that the photo in question is not on a beach...The picture has to be EXACTLY as you described it. On a beach, with my wife on a dune, slightly above me, and me flexing flam in profile.
@Vegas giantsBlackvegetable » 10 Jul 2021, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ so you spent the day in a carbonated community bidet...
Do you not see the striking resemblance between Mr. Charliese and a certain dwarf of your immediate acquaintance?
You favor the same fashions, the same candidates - he's probably also ammosexual.
@Vegas giantsBlackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ 1)![]()
2) go look at the shot you posted of yourself on the beach...same tunic.
Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ******, you made the accusation. Back it up. I get to set the terms.
I can’t post what doesn’t exist.
Apparently, you are zero integrity. I got you in two lies on this thread.
No, ******, you made the accusation. Back it up. I get to set the terms.
No...not one..Apparently, you are zero integrity. I got you in two lies on this thread.
Post the pic. Your wasting time. I have no clue what pic you are talking about.Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Only marginally less sensible than your last offer..
Why don't we move directly to the part where you explain that the photo in question is not on a beach...
Huey is an asshole.Vegasgiants » 11 Jul 2021, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ My dad died years ago. Are you a grownup that can control himself or not?
Post the pic.Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I made a comparison, you're having a meltdown.
Nod before you smell toast.
No...not one..
Dwarf,Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the pic. Your wasting time. I have no clue what pic you are talking about.
The challenge is on the table. Or you can forego the new conditions and go with the old. No harm to you. You got nothing to lose.
VG, we have gone over this. The problem is that you wont take responsibility. You blame others, not just of me, of what you do. It gets old. You repeatedly post immature comments that have nothing to do with the OP. You know that. I am not even going to ask you to admit that, because you know that. If you want to derail with immature posts, then ok. But then you don't get to report others for doing what you do daily.Vegasgiants » 11 Jul 2021, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ As long as it's about the op that is fine with me
But the derailing that goes on about long dead debates from other threads is distracting to the op
Dont you agree?
Huey » 11 Jul 2021, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the pic.
This is how we know there is no pic. If you would just post the pic I would be gone for three days. Or, if you accept the other challenge I will be go for over a year.
but since you know the pic doesn’t exist, you lied, you will spin and spin.
Are these your words?This is how we know there is no pic. If you would just post the pic I would be gone for three days. Or, if you accept the other challenge I will be go for over a year.
If that is really him I won’t post for a month.
I don’t know what pic you are referencing. Post it.Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2021, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
Let's save time....my sense is that you know the pic..
Tell everyone that it wasn't a beach.
Get the **** out of here, noinfo loser.Vegas » 11 Jul 2021, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ VG, we have gone over this. The problem is that you wont take responsibility. You blame others, not just of me, of what you do. It gets old. You repeatedly post immature comments that have nothing to do with the OP. You know that. I am not even going to ask you to admit that, because you know that. If you want to derail with immature posts, then ok. But then you don't get to report others for doing what you do daily.
@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer am I wrong?