can you eke out landslide?Blackvegetable » 02 Oct 2025, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ No, loser...try again..
Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election with 49.8 percent of the national popular vote — compared with 48.3 percent for Vice President Kamala Harris — and 312 electoral votes to Harris’s 226. In the 20 presidential elections since the end of World War II, Trump had the fourth-narrowest margin in the popular vote and seventh-narrowest in the Electoral College
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/01/opin ... -maga.html
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The real question is, why would you ever even bother to listen to an ignorant buffoon, like BV, the Eggplant?
If you can contest it......
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Zeets2 » 02 Oct 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ The real question is, why would you ever even bother to listen to an ignorant buffoon, like BV, the Eggplant?
The unvaccinated and those he thinks is lying about the vaccine.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑The unvaccinated..Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Who do you wanna shoot, gunophobe? Better question is since you fear firearms who do you want to have shot?
Anyone enabling the gaslighting, whether or not vaxxed.
Acknowledge that you were answered, Askholio.
I'd rush right out and buy that .50 caliber.
He sure sounds like a warrior....Huey » 02 Oct 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ The unvaccinated and those he thinks is lying about the vaccine.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 02 Oct 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ No...it means this...
We also have something of a natural experiment. If, with its decision in the 2024 presidential election, the voting public was casting an affirmative vote to make America great again, then we should expect high approval for both the president and his approach to the most salient MAGA concerns: immigration, crime and the economy. But if the decision was more contingent, then we should expect real public discontent with the president’s ideological crusades and radical agenda of national upheaval. And that, in fact, is what we’re seeing.
Recent polls from The Economist, Reuters, Gallup, Quinnipiac University and The Associated Press show Trump with terrible ratings with much of the public. Majorities disapprove of his handling of crime, immigration, foreign policy, the economy and trade. And overwhelming majorities reject his efforts to censor broadcasters he disagrees with. No other recent president — other than Trump himself in his first administration — has been this unpopular at this point in his term.
ibid.
tell everyone who pointed this out to you months ago....
Oh.. sign me up for the Kilmeade Vaccine.. I did not notice this thread began in 2021.Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ The document strikes an urgent note, revealing the agency knows it must revamp its public messaging to emphasize vaccination as the best defense against a variant so contagious that it acts almost like a different novel virus, leaping from target to target more swiftly than Ebola or the common cold.
no spam
you better wear it or the **** @Blackvegetable the **** coward will advocate for your shooting. The ****** ain’t man enough to do it himself (he has never been much of a man) but will call for someone else to do it.JohnnyYou » 02 Oct 2025, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh.. sign me up for the Kilmeade Vaccine.. I did not notice this thread began in 2021.
Plop Plop Fizz Fizz.. I am still gonna wear a mask at work and in public to protect my bro.
I thought COVID was Terminator Back Again this morning.. I actually contemplated if I should get a vax.. I am all in already.. Why not double down?
**** you ***.JohnnyYou » 02 Oct 2025, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh.. sign me up for the Kilmeade Vaccine.. I did not notice this thread began in 2021.
Plop Plop Fizz Fizz.. I am still gonna wear a mask at work and in public to protect my bro.
I thought COVID was Terminator Back Again this morning.. I actually contemplated if I should get a vax.. I am all in already.. Why not double down?
This *** spew ^ did not age well.Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ The document strikes an urgent note, revealing the agency knows it must revamp its public messaging to emphasize vaccination as the best defense against a variant so contagious that it acts almost like a different novel virus, leaping from target to target more swiftly than Ebola or the common cold.
https://news.yahoo.com/war-changed-inte ... 39094.html
Remember? Trump's Lawyers argued before the Supreme Court that a POTUS could assassinate political enemies?Huey » 02 Oct 2025, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ you better wear the **** @Blackvegetable the **** coward will advocate for your shooting. The ****** ain’t man enough to do it himself (he has never been much of a man) but will call for someone else to do it.
Remember, that ****** supports political assassinations.
JohnnyYou » 03 Oct 2025, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑ Remember? Trump's Lawyers argued before the Supreme Court that a POTUS could assassinate political enemies?
You are callng a majority of the country "The Enemy With In". I am not sure what you expect as a result.
double down on what, strokes, sudden death, clotting and spontaneous abortion? knock yourself out...JohnnyYou » 02 Oct 2025, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh.. sign me up for the Kilmeade Vaccine.. I did not notice this thread began in 2021.
Plop Plop Fizz Fizz.. I am still gonna wear a mask at work and in public to protect my bro.
I thought COVID was Terminator Back Again this morning.. I actually contemplated if I should get a vax.. I am all in already.. Why not double down?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom it ages so poorly, it died on the vine...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom libtardos are really good at that ****...when their argument wanes, they obfuscate and deflect...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I never said "Hang Mike Pence!"JohnnyYou » 03 Oct 2025, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑ Remember? Trump's Lawyers argued before the Supreme Court that a POTUS could assassinate political enemies?
You are callng a majority of the country "The Enemy With In". I am not sure what you expect as a result.