Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm

Once we reach this point with him ...he has proven that he is a time wasting piece of ****, NWO BRAINWASHED LIAR   who deserves to be ignored all the way back to the LIBERALS ONLY FORUM.
There is no amount of time we can spend with people like him that justifies the amount  of time that was wasted trying to convince  people like him that they are horribly brainwashed by FRAUDULENT TRAITORS ?AND WELL PROVEN LIARS like Walensky and Fauci.

 
 
  

You're preaching to the choir - I virtually never enter his smegfest threads. Just scroll right past them. 

This isn't a pitch - it's a pitchfork, and a lit torch. It's time for this bitch to meet the klavern.

I tend to just sail right past leftist *** these days - there isn't any there, there.
 
But THIS thread? It's a petard which simply demands a good hoisting. 

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:29 pm

You're preaching to the choir - I virtually never enter his smegfest threads. Just scroll right past them. 

This isn't a pitch - it's a pitchfork, and a lit torch. It's time for this bitch to meet the klavern.

I tend to just sail right past leftist *** these days - there isn't any there, there.
 
But THIS thread? It's a petard which simply demands a good hoisting.

How did such a Late Stage Boomer like him have his mind poisoned enough to hate everything that most normal people love about Americana...?
He was gullible enough to buy into the [[[NWO JEW NARRATIVE]]] as a 1970s High School student and College Kid.

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:25 pm

So you can attack the source, panty dancer?

Sure, pook.

How about local news affiliate WJTV?

https://www.wjtv.com/health/coronavirus ... cine-info/

No? How about Newsweek? Will Newsweek do?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... ar-AASI51U

No? Los Angeles Times?

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/ ... on-license

Want others, Pook? Don't wanna load ya down. I think you've got enough to inspire a fine panty dance. If not, tap three times on the ceiling - I'll give you a few more.

Did you read any of them?

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:17 pm

Heh heh.

You always respond with such outrage and pique, to facts. 

What is SO inconvenient about truths, pookie bear?

The truth is the neither hydroxychloroquene nor ivermectin work against Covid, and asserting so is a violation of medical ethics.

Vegas » 15 Nov 2022, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:13 pm

Since when have you ever provided evidence for your claims? Yeah, never. So **** your demands.

Tell me how many examples I must post before you acknowledge that you're a lying moron, and kill yourself. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:50 pm

Did you read any of them?

No questions, dick sucker. 

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:53 pm

The truth is the neither hydroxychloroquene nor ivermectin work against Covid, and asserting so is a violation of medical ethics.

For which the persecution you so recently denied is in proper order - right, pookie?

anyway, thank you for your scientific opinion, cuck who cannot distinguish male from female without a questionnaire...

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:02 pm

For which the persecution you so recently denied is in proper order - right, pookie?

anyway, thank you for your scientific opinion, cuck you cannot distinguish male from female without a questionnaire...

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg

Yes, it is.

None are being persecuted for suggesting that the vaccine has side effects.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:03 pm

Yes, it is.

None are being persecuted for suggesting that the vaccine has side effects.

You didn't read the links, pookie bear.

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm

You didn't read the links, pookie bear.

No...I did.

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:06 pm

No...I did.

Then you failed to comprehend it, rube.

From the l.a. times, **** face:

The federation mentioned doctors’ responsibility to share information that is “factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven,” and added: “Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”

Until there is a CONSENSUS, suggesting the vax can cause myocarditis will risk the loss of licensure in the State of California.
Until the subject can be broached, there can never arise a consensus. 

This ^ ends science, stupe. It outlaws inquiry and dialogue - the very staples of the scientific method. 

That you need this explained tells us everything, retard. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:09 pm

Then you failed to comprehend it, rube.

From the l.a. times, **** face:

The federation mentioned doctors’ responsibility to share information that is “factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven,” and added: “Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”

Until there is a CONSENSUS, suggesting the vax can cause myocarditis will risk the loss of licensure in the State of California.
Until the subject can be broached, there can never arise a consensus. 

This ^ ends science, stupe. It outlaws inquiry and dialogue - the very staples of the scientific method. 

That you need this explained tells us everything, retard.

**** that, Tenpenny.

https://youtu.be/jWHZgzWg-1U
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:12 pm

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:09 pm

Then you failed to comprehend it, rube.

From the l.a. times, **** face:

The federation mentioned doctors’ responsibility to share information that is “factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven,” and added: “Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”

Until there is a CONSENSUS, suggesting the vax can cause myocarditis will risk the loss of licensure in the State of California.
Until the subject can be broached, there can never arise a consensus. 

This ^ ends science, stupe. It outlaws inquiry and dialogue - the very staples of the scientific method. 

That you need this explained tells us everything, retard.

**** that, Tenpenny.

Nice panty dance. Try again - this time, address my post:

From the l.a. times, **** face:

The federation mentioned doctors’ responsibility to share information that is “factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven,” and added: “Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”

Until there is a CONSENSUS, suggesting the vax can cause myocarditis will risk the loss of licensure in the State of California.
Until the subject can be broached, there can never arise a consensus. 

This ^ ends science, stupe. It outlaws inquiry and dialogue - the very staples of the scientific method. 

That you need this explained tells us everything, retard.

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:14 pm

Nice panty dance. Try again - this time, address my post:

From the l.a. times, **** face:

The federation mentioned doctors’ responsibility to share information that is “factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven,” and added: “Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”

Until there is a CONSENSUS, suggesting the vax can cause myocarditis will risk the loss of licensure in the State of California.
Until the subject can be broached, there can never arise a consensus. 

This ^ ends science, stupe. It outlaws inquiry and dialogue - the very staples of the scientific method. 

That you need this explained tells us everything, retard.

Until there is a CONSENSUS, suggesting the vax can cause myocarditis will risk

It is a recognized and quantified risk, you **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:16 pm

It is a recognized and quantified risk, you **** idiot.

No, you ***, it is not quantified in the least. I have posted proofs this very day in this very thread that the issue is under investigation. 

By definition, you fapping fraud, that means there is no CONSENSUS.

Speaking outside of CONSENSUS, you fapping fraud, can cost you your LICENSE.

Losing your license if a form of persecution - which you denied existed before you confirmed and defended it. 

Focus on biology until you get the fundamentals, rube.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Nov 2022, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:23 pm

No, you ***, it is not quantified in the least. I have poste proofs this very day in this very thread that the issue is under investigation. 

By definition, you fapping fraud, that means there is no CONCENSUS.

Speaking outside of CONSENSUS, you fapping fraud, can cost you your LICENSE.

Losing your license if a form of persecution - which you denied existed before you confirmed and defended it. 

Focus on biology until you get the fundamentals, rube.

Please stop.

Large-scale COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA technology revealed a small but real risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis (VAM). Presenting at rates of less than 4 per 100,000 in the general population, the incidence of VAM was too small to be detected in the vaccine safety and efficacy trials.

https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiolog ... in-context


No chance in hell you're gonna shut the **** up now, is there....

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:55 pm

Tell me how many examples I must post before you acknowledge that you're a lying moron, and kill yourself.

Please. You post your **** examples after being asked 500 times first. 

So **** off.

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:29 pm

Please stop.

Large-scale COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA technology revealed a small but real risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis (VAM). Presenting at rates of less than 4 per 100,000 in the general population, the incidence of VAM was too small to be detected in the vaccine safety and efficacy trials.

https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiolog ... in-context

No chance in hell you're gonna shut the **** up now, is there....

It was so easy for [[[THE GLOBALISTS]]] to sell such paralyzing  no stop  fear to effeminately raised *** like you.  
https://youtu.be/Y4a-0gDg1GI

Check out this "SUPER SPREADER EVENT" after the [[[ELITE]]] convince effeminate queers like BV  that catching CV19 is a DEATH SENTENCE THAT VERY FEW EVER SURVIVE....  


 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:29 pm

Please stop.

Large-scale COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA technology revealed a small but real risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis (VAM). Presenting at rates of less than 4 per 100,000 in the general population, the incidence of VAM was too small to be detected in the vaccine safety and efficacy trials.

https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiolog ... in-context

No chance in hell you're gonna shut the **** up now, is there....

Fruity, the actual relationship between the covid vaccine and myocarditis will not be known for years. You are a test subject in a long term study which is ONGOING. Grow up and learn some science, you fruitcake. 

I TWICE gave you the link to prove that pfizer an moderna just launched a study of that relationship. 

Here's a question, fruit: If the science is settled, WHY IS IT BEING STUDIED?
 
 

No evidence could more fully prove that science has been politicized than the fact of official suppression of speech.

One wonders, why would there be any NEED to censor speech, except to suppress knowledge? To suppress the free flow of any information which threatens the financial interests to which big pharma's political vassals are indebted for their jobs?

These leftist goons have gone from screeching to get the money out of politics, to DEFENDING the monied interests who control their politics. They've gone from OCCUPYING wall street to chanting its mantras, at the speed of retard. They remind one of the neocons of the early years of this century - those bad old days of retard george w.