Liberal Forum

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:39 am

Already posted I was wrong to believe they did not make one.  I will say google helped you out.

But you're wrong, or lying about that..


 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 10:34 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 10:30 am

Primitive?  Nope.  I am listening to the words of the guy you voted for. 

You don't need to respond because I have discussed stand your ground with you.  You are many of the millions who swallow the MSM talking point that Stand your Ground gives someone the right to shoot if an altercation for any reason.  That makes you ignorant on the topic.

Primitive?  Nope.  I am listening to the words of the guy you voted for.

Where?

You heard them....not where you will try to find them.

You don't need to respond because I have

post the rule....could save me a lot of time..

You are many of the millions who swallow the MSM talking point that Stand your Ground gives someone the right to shoot if an altercation for any reason.  That makes you ignorant on the topic.

I know I can cruise  my hood, defy police dispatcher instructions, confront kids - and shoot them....asserting that I was "standing my ground"..

Not only will I walk, you'll cut a check for my defense.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:39 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:35 am

Try again, DEMA!

Oh, but I very much am..

If the possible consequence is severe bodily harm, or death, that **** ******* is toast.

Nod.
 

 

If you confront them you are the aggressor.  That is not stand your ground unless you make an attempt to withdraw from the confrontation you created.  And you can only shoot if they are attacking you.

Why don't you go dig out that shotgun you claim to have somewhere in your home and give it a try.  

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 10:59 am

Post the thread title.

Rule, idiot. 

Thread titles aren't arguments you desperate ****. 

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:41 am

You leave out the word "imminent".  You are vaccinated.  

Next, you will lose.  One of the first things the prosecution will do after establishing your did in fact shoot someone is go through your social media posts.  And yes, they will find this place.  And figure out who you are.  It won't be good for you.

You leave out the word "imminent".  You are vaccinated.  

Already debunked..

One of the first things the prosecution will do after establishing your did in fact shoot someone is go through your social media posts.  And yes, they will find this place.  And figure out who you are.  It won't be good for you.

Not only are my legal grounds unassailable, my fealty to conservative principles is unimpeachable.

You lose, and lose.....again


Tough day..

Horrible half decade..

Vegas » 30 Jul 2021, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:45 am

Rule, idiot. 

Thread titles aren't arguments you desperate ****.

I don't indulge cowardice..


 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:43 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:39 am

Already posted I was wrong to believe they did not make one.  I will say google helped you out.

But you're wrong, or lying about that..


 

 

What am I wrong about?  You have two separate comments up there.  I said I was wrong to believe they didn't make one.  And you can not prove one way or the other if your knowledge is from google.  

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:45 am

If you confront them you are the aggressor.  That is not stand your ground unless you make an attempt to withdraw from the confrontation you created.  And you can only shoot if they are attacking you.

Why don't you go dig out that shotgun you claim to have somewhere in your home and give it a try.

I can't risk trusting my eyes...it's happening at a viral level..

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:46 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:41 am

You leave out the word "imminent".  You are vaccinated.  

Next, you will lose.  One of the first things the prosecution will do after establishing your did in fact shoot someone is go through your social media posts.  And yes, they will find this place.  And figure out who you are.  It won't be good for you.

You leave out the word "imminent".  You are vaccinated.  

Already debunked..

One of the first things the prosecution will do after establishing your did in fact shoot someone is go through your social media posts.  And yes, they will find this place.  And figure out who you are.  It won't be good for you.

Not only are my legal grounds unassailable, my fealty to conservative principles is unimpeachable.

You lose, and lose.....again


Tough day..

Horrible half decade..

 

LMAO!  You have no legal grounds for what you describe.  You lose, DEMA.  That is a topic you should stay away from.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:47 am

I don't indulge cowardice..

It's not about one person. You start a thread for the forum, so anyone with half a brain would expect the author of the OP to put some of his own thoughts into his own OP, instead of copying someone else's every **** time. 

Coward.

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:47 am

What am I wrong about?  You have two separate comments up there.  I said I was wrong to believe they didn't make one.  And you can not prove one way or the other if your knowledge is from google.

And you can not prove one way or the other if your knowledge is from google.  

On what basis do you keep insisting it is?


"Duhhhhh....I ain't evah heirt of et!"

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:50 am

On what basis do you keep insisting it is?

"Duhhhhh....I ain't evah heirt of et!"

**** your questions. Answer some for once in your miserable disgusting life.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:48 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:45 am

If you confront them you are the aggressor.  That is not stand your ground unless you make an attempt to withdraw from the confrontation you created.  And you can only shoot if they are attacking you.

Why don't you go dig out that shotgun you claim to have somewhere in your home and give it a try.

I can't risk trusting my eyes...it's happening at a viral level..

 

 

Stand your Ground is a self defense law, or doctrine.  Doesn't mean you can go confront people and shoot people. But, the MSM and your politicians have told you it is so you believe it. 

But, as stupid as your are, you are not that stupid to believe what you are posting. 
 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2021, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:49 am

It's not about one person. You start a thread for the forum, so anyone with half a brain would expect the author of the OP to put some of his own thoughts into his own OP, instead of copying someone else's every **** time. 

Coward.

I do..

I bear no responsibility for your inability to understand it.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:50 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:47 am

What am I wrong about?  You have two separate comments up there.  I said I was wrong to believe they didn't make one.  And you can not prove one way or the other if your knowledge is from google.

And you can not prove one way or the other if your knowledge is from google.  

On what basis do you keep insisting it is?


"Duhhhhh....I ain't evah heirt of et!"

 

What basis do you keep insisting it isn't?     Whether it is or not I immediately admitted I was wrong to believe that they did not make one.  that is how a man does it.    

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am

Stand your Ground is a self defense law, or doctrine.  Doesn't mean you can go confront people and shoot people. But, the MSM and your politicians have told you it is so you believe it. 

But, as stupid as your are, you are not that stupid to believe what you are posting.

As long as the don't come any closer than one and a half klicks, depending on the breeze, neither of us have anything to worry about.
 

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:52 am

What basis do you keep insisting it isn't?     Whether it is or not I immediately admitted I was wrong to believe that they did not make one.  that is how a man does it.  

There isn't a hint of "Man" in that tragic ****.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:53 am

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am

Stand your Ground is a self defense law, or doctrine.  Doesn't mean you can go confront people and shoot people. But, the MSM and your politicians have told you it is so you believe it. 

But, as stupid as your are, you are not that stupid to believe what you are posting.

As long as the don't come any closer than one and a half klicks, depending on the breeze, neither of us have anything to worry about.
 

 

Trying to convince a judge you have a reasonable fear of imminent death or severe bodily harm at more than 25 feet and you will have an issue. 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am

**** your questions. Answer some for once in your miserable disgusting life.

I show you I have, you take 20 years off.

After you kill yourself, of course.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:51 am

I do..

I bear no responsibility for your inability to understand it.

You post level 1. Anyone and their **** dog can do that. 

I bear no responsibility for your inability to not have the intellectual capacity to reach or even  recognize level 2+

 

Huey » 30 Jul 2021, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 11:55 am

Trying to convince a judge you have a reasonable fear of imminent death or severe bodily harm at more than 25 feet and you will have an issue.

Not if he's a Patriot...