Liberal Forum

Vegas » 02 Aug 2021, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:02 am

Pretending again. You were already exposed in this. Try again.

No..

Just post it.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:03 am

No..

Just post it.

Yes. 

Already have. 

This is a great new video that applies to you perfectly. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot3IwBtL51U

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:03 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:00 am

You don't read real well.  And you don't know **** about real estate paralegals.  In small law firms they do most of the work for the closing.

This is about whether a paralegal in the early 90s made enough to cover the bills for 3..

The answer is no.
 

 

I didn't meet her in the early 90s.  And yes, she was able to pay the bills for 3.  I am guessing you did not live in Hampton Roads at anytime in the 90s nor are you a real estate paralegal.  She owned her own townhouse.  You should really stop with your lies.  

Another of your talking points bites the dust. 

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am

I didn't meet her in the early 90s.  And yes, she was able to pay the bills for 3.  I am guessing you did not live in Hampton Roads at anytime in the 90s nor are you a real estate paralegal.  She owned her own townhouse.  You should really stop with your lies.  

Another of your talking points bites the dust.

Veghead making up **** again?

Vegas » 02 Aug 2021, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:08 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am

I didn't meet her in the early 90s.  And yes, she was able to pay the bills for 3.  I am guessing you did not live in Hampton Roads at anytime in the 90s nor are you a real estate paralegal.  She owned her own townhouse.  You should really stop with your lies.  

Another of your talking points bites the dust.

Veghead making up **** again?

 

Of course.  He is trying to form an argument that the only reason my wife married me was for the money.  ****, when we met I did not make that much money.  

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:09 am

Of course.  He is trying to form an argument that the only reason my wife married me was for the money.  ****, when we met I did not make that much money.

Desperate. He is so **** desperate.

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am

I didn't meet her in the early 90s.  And yes, she was able to pay the bills for 3.  I am guessing you did not live in Hampton Roads at anytime in the 90s nor are you a real estate paralegal.  She owned her own townhouse.  You should really stop with your lies.  

Another of your talking points bites the dust.

It's not a function of Narrative...It's math.


You lose.
 

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:09 am

Of course.  He is trying to form an argument that the only reason my wife married me was for the money.  ****, when we met I did not make that much money.

No...not "for the money"....you don't have any..

It was for the "security", guaranteed by American Taxpayers..


CA-CHING!


 

Vegas » 02 Aug 2021, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:04 am

Yes. 

Already have. 

This is a great new video that applies to you perfectly. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot3IwBtL51U

You watch a lot of those.....while frittering away your childrens' futures...

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:17 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:07 am

I didn't meet her in the early 90s.  And yes, she was able to pay the bills for 3.  I am guessing you did not live in Hampton Roads at anytime in the 90s nor are you a real estate paralegal.  She owned her own townhouse.  You should really stop with your lies.  

Another of your talking points bites the dust.

It's not a function of Narrative...It's math.


You lose.
 

 

You haven't provided any.  You have provided nothing but unsubstantiated narrattive.  Also, if she wanted me because of money or benefits we wouldn't have waited 7 years to get married. 

You are not doing well with this argument either.  

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:19 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:09 am

Of course.  He is trying to form an argument that the only reason my wife married me was for the money.  ****, when we met I did not make that much money.

No...not "for the money"....you don't have any..

It was for the "security", guaranteed by American Taxpayers..


CA-CHING!


 

 

Nope.  Another epic fail.  See my last post. You have been crashing and burning so much you should use this as your avatar:

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:20 am

You haven't provided any.  You have provided nothing but unsubstantiated narrattive.  Also, if she wanted me because of money or benefits we wouldn't have waited 7 years to get married. 

You are not doing well with this argument either.

She held out til she knew you were vested...


It was either the Gold Brick in the Black Tunic, or one of those teenagers you insist she excites....
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:20 am

You watch a lot of those.....while frittering away your childrens' futures...

Nah. I just look at he title. It suits you. 

You will get this video every time you 'pretend' you don't know the rule, just like you get the repeating vid every time **** needs to be repeated to you. 

Have fun with it.

 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:22 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:20 am

You haven't provided any.  You have provided nothing but unsubstantiated narrattive.  Also, if she wanted me because of money or benefits we wouldn't have waited 7 years to get married. 

You are not doing well with this argument either.

She held out til she knew you were vested...


It was either the Gold Brick in the Black Tunic, or one of those teenagers you insist she excites....
 

 

Speaking of Black Tunic, I don't see a pic yet..........

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:22 am

Nope.  Another epic fail.  See my last post. You have been crashing and burning so much you should use this as your avatar:

Dwarf,

My right to license is no less than yours.

The only difference is that I don't need to spend days trying to leverage them into evidence of Stupid..

You do.....and consistently fail.
 

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:23 am

Speaking of Black Tunic, I don't see a pic yet..........

Were you expecting to?

Vegas » 02 Aug 2021, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:23 am

Nah. I just look at he title. It suits you. 

You will get this video every time you 'pretend' you don't know the rule, just like you get the repeating vid every time **** needs to be repeated to you. 

Have fun with it.

How do you know it's "great"?


You're dumber than ****, Vag.


Unemployable...
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:26 am

How do you know it's "great"?

You're dumber than ****, Vag.

Unemployable...

Rule, idiot. 

Absolute **** moron. Pure moron.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:24 am

Dwarf,

My right to license is no less than yours.

The only difference is that I don't need to spend days trying to leverage them into evidence of Stupid..

You do.....and consistently fail.

Your beach pic.  Epic Fail.

Number of kids she has.  Your next epic fail.

Your attempt to argue stand your ground, Epic Fail.

The salary she made, Epic Fail.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2021, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:25 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2021, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2021, 11:23 am

Speaking of Black Tunic, I don't see a pic yet..........

Were you expecting to?

 

Nope.  It doesn't exist.  After the big deal you made of it I expect you to say Blackvegetable was wrong.