Explain "allusion" to @Vegas ...
That's you, Vag...Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you talk...and talk...and talk...and then you repat it all 900k times.
No. I never had a challenge with you. Plus, you’re account is so far in arrears I’ll apply it to your bill.Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ If so, you should make plans for the next 2 weeks.
Then review your posts raving about your beefcakiness....
Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Explain "allusion" to @Vegas ...
Also "sample/population" and "survivorship bias"
Good luck...
But, first....ask him...
Zero integrity...Huey » 06 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No. I never had a challenge with you. Plus, you’re account is so far in arrears I’ll apply it to your bill.
I didn’t. It was a comment made to naffy
No, Vag..Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Projecting ^^^
Your projections are more intense today than usual.
Huey » 06 Feb 2023, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn’t. It was a comment made to naffy
Lets see, you owe me for the beach pic, the stroky challenge you admitted you lost, the Michele challenge, etc.
Consider it even.
Zero integrity...Huey » 06 Feb 2023, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn’t. It was a comment made to naffy
Lets see, you owe me for the beach pic, the stroky challenge you admitted you lost, the Michele challenge, etc.
Consider it even.
Well, many of his talking points have come crumbling down,Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I think Mary may have triggered herself today.
@Blackvegetable
Your combined Barnacle Ratio is near 90%..Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I think Mary may have triggered herself today.
@Blackvegetable
Specifically?
Yes, you are…
I’ll bump one of them although I did a moment ago.
As you incessantly demand : Prove it.
Vag,Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You projected through copying me again.
God you are pathetic. You can't even insult me without plagiarism me.
I'm too busy laughing at your stupid ***... Mr Suave!Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Explain "allusion" to @Vegas ...
Also "sample/population" and "survivorship bias"
Good luck...
But, first....ask him...
You can do your own work