to calculate the Barnacle Ratio requires quantifying both numerator and denoninator....to do so I must access the relevant information from a site page.Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I knew that if 'thoughts of your own' was part of the deal, then you would fold.
We both know....you couldn't sublimate your guilt, so you began leaking photos from the same trip.
I told you there never was a beach. The second pic I posted is the one I posted to this forum.Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ We both know....you couldn't sublimate your guilt, so you began leaking photos from the same trip.
But, of course, you cherry picked them
There ya go…
@BlackvegetableBlackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑Specifically?
Tiny,Huey » 06 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I told you there never was a beach. The second pic I posted is the one I posted to this forum.
But, that’s not the point. Earlier you asked for proof I crushed your years long talking points about me.
This is an example of a couple of them, CL.
Post your point.....so I only have to shoot once.
Nope. You were very specific, CL. And I was very specific in the challenge. This why people don’t make such deals with you.Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
To someone looking at the picture we both know about, you could very well be standing on or near a beach.
Otherwise you would already have posted it.
So. You make a claim knowing that you can't prove it...then demand that I disprove a claim that you cannot prove in the first place.Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ to calculate the Barnacle Ratio requires quantifying both numerator and denoninator....to do so I must access the relevant information from a site page.
You will call this "having the internet think" for me, because you are an idiot and a coward.
Go ahead and try to deny it.
No...I say I CAN prove it.Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ So. You make a claim knowing that you can't prove it...then demand that I disprove a claim that you cannot prove in the first place.
You truly are, without a doubt, the dumbest piece of **** on this forum.
That makes a lot of sense Rico.
Tinyweasel,Huey » 06 Feb 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. You were very specific, CL. And I was very specific in the challenge. This why people don’t make such deals with you.
Doesn’t matter though. I have crushed 5 years of your descriptions of me in a spectacular, and very embarrassing manner for you, in one night.
Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I say I CAN prove it.
I also say that I won't do so subject to your interpretation.
Tell everyone why...
Don't make an *** of yourself again before asking him.
No...**** your excuses and demands.Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Then prove it.
And **** your excuses. You're not fooling anyone.
And **** your demands. God man. **** narcissists. You guys never stop.
Do we have a deal?Vegas » 06 Feb 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable I am 100% certain, that your coward *** will find a way to turn it around on me, though it's your claim.
**** your cowardice.
Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No...**** your excuses and demands.
Do we have a deal?