He sure as **** won't take a stand, the ******.
well, he is the forum's "**** ******"...
You are remarkably full of ****.Cannonpointer » 19 May 2025, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ The reason you were banned for a month was because you broke your cowardly pattern, took a stand, and lost a bet.
The whole reason you took the bet was that you got embarrassed at being called out for never having the balls to take a stand.
Here's a suggestion: If you want to be known as other than the coward you're universally considered to be, instead of making stupid bets, just start manning the **** up. Here's a chance - take a stand: IF GENDER IS NOT SEX, WHY SHOULD GENDER DETERMINE WHAT SEX YOU SHOWER WITH?
He didn't.
And yet you prove it true by ducking the question - *******.Blackvegetable » 20 May 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ You are remarkably full of ****.
Not a single element of that spew is true.
So, your knock on me is that I respect the dictionary, and you do not?Blackvegetable » 20 May 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ He didn't.
Years ago.
@Cannonpointer did.....to his Funk&Wagnalls. His "science" exposed as nothing but philological flatus, he has spent years since trying to restore his edifice of rhetorical ****.
The knock is that you wield a dictionary as a science text.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ So, your knock on me is that I respect the dictionary, and you do not?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You are a special brand of stupid, pookie.
You answered two different guys claiming you lacked the balls to answer a simple question pertinent to your established position. And in neither "answer" did you have the balls to address the question both of those guys agreed you would skirt-hike away from.
You literally skirt-hiked while shrieking that you're not a skirt-hiker.
What a weak ***, boy. You are truly THIS stupid.![]()
Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ And yet you prove it true by ducking the question - *******.![]()
![]()
The "knock" is that you run like a bitch and try to distract when challenged with a direct challenge.Blackvegetable » 20 May 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ The knock is that you wield a dictionary as a science text.
Acknowledge that you understand this.
Using integers, two.
Oh, no...Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Using integers, two.
Thanks, pook.![]()
Now - let us end the distractions. No more squirrels.
IF GENDER IS NOT SEX, WHY SHOULD A GENDER CLAIM CHANGE WHAT SEX YOU SHOWER WITH AND COMPETE IN SPORTS AGAINST?
Did you answer all of my questions about your OP after being asked the first time?Blackvegetable » 20 May 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, no...
It begins with your confession that you're a lying piece of ****.
Are these your words?Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ The "knock" is that you run like a bitch and try to distract when challenged with a direct challenge.
Acknowledge that you are skirt hiking.
If gender is not sex, why do they need gender affirming care?Cannonpointer » 19 May 2025, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ IF GENDER IS NOT SEX, WHY SHOULD GENDER DETERMINE WHAT SEX YOU SHOWER WITH?
Blackvegetable » 20 May 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, no...
It begins with your confession that you're a lying piece of ****.