.
.Oh, so you mean that a District map was actually drawn the way FLORIDA LAW said it had to be with actual Districts that aren't RACIALLY GERRYMANDERED!!!! Sucks that you know only what your PROPAGANDISTS tell you to think, huh, ButtSee??B.See » 25 Apr 2022, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ @Buffalo @omh **** you trolls. As usual nothing worth a response. NADA. lame-asses
IN RECENT NEWS:
"Black votes are under attack": Experts say Ron DeSantis' new congressional map is "deeply racist" | Salon.com
They're racially gerrymandered if they deliberately dilute Black voting strength. Most every analyst knows it except you fascist shills supporters defenders and apologists.Beekeeper » 02 May 2022, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, so you mean that a District map was actually drawn the way FLORIDA LAW said it had to be with actual Districts that aren't RACIALLY GERRYMANDERED!!!! Sucks that you know only what your PROPAGANDISTS tell you to think, huh, ButtSee??
You are so unimportant and 100% of your crap is nothing but the same worn out "talking points" that have been DEBUNKED a thousand times!!!
And those claims that "Blacks can't vote on Sunday". Neither can WHITE PEOPLE, MORON, if there is no Sunday voting in that county/State. But you seem to think that that is "Racist" in some manner.
So, let's see here. If they create Districts that give BLACKS "voting strength" with RACIAL GERRYMANDERED DISTRICT LINES and DILUTE WHITE VOTING STRENGTH, you APPROVE!!! But ones that follow geographical boundaries WITHOUT regard to skin color are "racist".B.See » 02 May 2022, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ They're racially gerrymandered if they deliberately dilute Black voting strength. Most every analyst knows it except you fascist shills supporters defenders and apologists.
And who said Black people can't vote on Sunday. I've never written it, never said it. DON'T PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH, CHUMP.
Beekeeper » 02 May 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ So, let's see here. If they create Districts that give BLACKS "voting strength" with RACIAL GERRYMANDERED DISTRICT LINES and DILUTE WHITE VOTING STRENGTH, you APPROVE!!! But ones that follow geographical boundaries WITHOUT regard to skin color are "racist".
Hmmmm. Sounds like YOU are another Democrat RACIST after all!!
1. They were RACIAL gerrymanders. And there were 4 Districts and 2 of them were PURE RACIALLY GERRYMANDERED!! Never followed any geographical boundary AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW to follow, but drawn to include only "black people" within the lines. DeSantis CURED that problem with lines that represent the GEOPOLITICAL WILL of the people within that District. Blacks can vote for whomever they want. If they want to elect someone, go work to get them elected, instead of whining about how mistreated they are. Because BLACKS have 100% exactly the same opportunities as do ANY OTHER RACE. When you base ANYTHING on the color of someone's SKIN, you are a RACIST!!B.See » 02 May 2022, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑
- Why would DeSantis remove the only two existing Black voting districts they had?
- Why have judge after judge, in many states, even GOP judges, sent back GOP gerrymandered districts CALLING them racists?
- Why is it Republicans DON'T mind an Electoral College system that gives disproportionate power to (mostly rural and white) states, but pitch a bitch over one or two black majority voting districts??
why are you demanding segregation?B.See » 02 May 2022, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑WHY HAVE THEY GIVEN THEMSELVES THE POWER TO OVERTURN ELECTION OUTCOMES THEY DON'T LIKE??????????????
- Why would DeSantis remove the only two existing Black voting districts they had?
- Why have judge after judge, in many states, even GOP judges, sent back GOP gerrymandered districts CALLING them racists?
- Why is it Republicans DON'T mind an Electoral College system that gives disproportionate power to (mostly rural and white) states, but pitch a bitch over one or two black majority voting districts??
- Why have Republicans closed polling places in majority Black voting precincts?
- Why have they cut hours at locales they didn't close?
- Why do they pass laws that disproportionately affect the elderly, the poor, the disabled?
- Why have they shut down, moved, or eliminated drop boxes?
Say what you will, the GOP wins FAR MORE OFTEN THAN NOT via gerrymandered districts and the electoral college. As cited in some of numerous posts in THIS THREAD that people like YOU try to bury behind ****:Beekeeper » 02 May 2022, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ 1. They were RACIAL gerrymanders. And there were 4 Districts and 2 of them were PURE RACIALLY GERRYMANDERED!! Never followed any geographical boundary AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW to follow, but drawn to include only "black people" within the lines. DeSantis CURED that problem with lines that represent the GEOPOLITICAL WILL of the people within that District. Blacks can vote for whomever they want. If they want to elect someone, go work to get them elected, instead of whining about how mistreated they are. Because BLACKS have 100% exactly the same opportunities as do ANY OTHER RACE. When you base ANYTHING on the color of someone's SKIN, you are a RACIST!!
2. Its been DEMOCRATS that have had their District lines shot down in the Courts, MORON. Try NY State, Maryland and a few others. Nice try, but you lose.Yeah, a couple of Republican maps are being reworked but NOT for the reasons you think they are!! LoSeR again!!!
3. The ELECTORAL SYSTEM is more than fair since it prevents 5 cities/ States from RULING OVER OUR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION and gives the "equal voice" to ALL States, regardless of size. You want "disproportionate power" if you "popular vote" as an election means for President, moron. Let's use YOUR justification for "Racially gerrymandered Districts" in that SMALL STATES won't be able to ELECT THE CANDIDATE OF THEIR CHOICE in anything BUT an Electoral College system. Same as you claim that Blacks can't without GERRYMANDERING!!
!!
.
ha ha ha ha REPRESENTATION equals people not allowed to think for themselves while governed by someone else's specific ideas of tomorrrow. yesterday makes today what it is the future is only developing forward now.B.See » 03 May 2022, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑ .
.
REPRESENTATION equates to "segregation" for you, chump?? Go back to your regular psuedo intellectual PABLUM, TROLL. At least it was WORTH a fkng chuckle or two.
omh » 03 May 2022, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑ ha ha ha ha REPRESENTATION equals people not allowed to think for themselves while governed by someone else's specific ideas of tomorrrow. yesterday makes today what it is the future is only developing forward now.
Thermodynamics of the situation with spontaneously alive since conceived mutually ancestrally evolving since inception until extinction event ends reproduction of added great great grandchildren already born as last generation present.
Specificity to kinetics of genetic results in plain sight you educated idiot. All you care to do is pretend life is more than all you were since conceived. Which is it, greed, lust, gluttony, pride, sloth demanding everyone else carry you through adapt or become extinct existence here now because you fooled yourself completely that living isn't self evident.
Person or people doing the same thing, tyranny is tyranny by one or many. Democracy doesn't distribute fairness because perpetual balancing isn't fair. Karma, eternal life through ancestral additions of compounding DNA additions where each addition is total sum of their past ancestors that bred the species forward now.
Simple compounding DNA.
HOW F-ING STUPID ARE YOU??? "Nationwide Senate popular vote" is MEANINGLESS since Senators are elected ONLY WITHIN THE STATE they come from, buttfloss. You can't vote for a Senator in California if you live in Rhode Island, MORON And YOU don't even have a Constitutional right to VOTE FOR PRESIDENT and that "popular vote" is ALSO MEANINGLESS, MORON!!!B.See » 03 May 2022, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑ Say what you will, the GOP wins FAR MORE OFTEN THAN NOT via gerrymandered districts and the electoral college. As cited in some of numerous posts in THIS THREAD that people like YOU try to bury behind ****:
The Republican Attack Upon The Right to Vote - Page 12 - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Last time Republicans won a majority of the Senate popular vote was in 1946
How minority rule plagues Senate: Republicans last won more support than Democrats two decades ago
It most CERTAINLY does not equate to one man one vote. And even when the fascist **** LOSE BY BOTH, they whine like little bitches that the election was "stolen."
"Stolen" by whom?? All those Black votes who fascists think SHOULDN'T COUNT ANYWAY, I'd imagine.
Here's the difference between "justice" for voter fraud between DELIBERATE white Republican CHEATERS LIKE MEADOWS and when Black people make a mistake.
White Woman Gets Probation For Voter Fraud–Black Women Get Prison Time | NewsOne
With North Florida congressional district gone, Black voters wonder: 'What happens to us?'
Instinctive awareness how living evolves in plain sight is usual nonsense to you? Society really did allow you to mind hyperbole to death and extinction comes first than be honest about yourself in public arena of ideas. Even cyberspace.B.See » 03 May 2022, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ There ya go. Right back to your usual nonsense. Whew.... for awhile I was beginning to think you'd taken ill.
Beekeeper » 03 May 2022, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ HOW F-ING STUPID ARE YOU??? "Nationwide Senate popular vote" is MEANINGLESS since Senators are elected ONLY WITHIN THE STATE they come from, buttfloss. You can't vote for a Senator in California if you live in Rhode Island, MORON And YOU don't even have a Constitutional right to VOTE FOR PRESIDENT and that "popular vote" is ALSO MEANINGLESS, MORON!!!
Now, SHOW ME ONE PERSON who is LEGALLY ENTITLED TO VOTE has not been able to cast a ballot. And not some "provisional" CRAP since that is only to VALIDATE their LEGALLITY before counting their ballot!!
!!
Hey MORON, quoting your EXACT WORDS isn't "putting words in your mouth".B.See » 05 May 2022, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you keep trying to put words in my mouth asshole? FUX "News" got you THAT DAFT??? Where did I say Senators were elected nationwide?? In fact I posted THREE articles to the CONTRARY. Oh... I forget. YOU DON'T READ THEM... ASSWIPE.
As for WHO has not been able to cast a ballot. GO BACK AND READ THE FKNG ARTICLES. I'd think you'd have ENOUGH TO CHOOSE FROM.
Beekeeper » 05 May 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Hey MORON, quoting your EXACT WORDS isn't "putting words in your mouth".
How DAFT ARE YOU anyway??? Oh sorry, a rhetorical question.
Beekeeper » 05 May 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Hey MORON, quoting your EXACT WORDS isn't "putting words in your mouth".
How DAFT ARE YOU anyway??? Oh sorry, a rhetorical question.