Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 17 Oct 2021, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2021, 2:47 pm

https://themadtruther.com/2021/09/23/ni ... hypocrisy/

Why PG?

Is the OP afraid that Nikki Minaj actually doesn't have any balls?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 2:20 pm

Why PG?

Is the OP afraid that Nikki Minaj actually doesn't have any balls?

No questions, dick sucker. 

omh » 18 Oct 2021, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2021, 6:40 am

I did that 55 years of my time adapting to space. Never again. I understand how to correct human error without playing scorched Earth policy wonking like most people do serving a type cast reality be it in servitude of God, country, community theater selling franchises of who's who on the world stage today.

WTF is "adapting to space"?  You cannot exist unless you occupy space.
Have you tried to sell franchises of who's who on the world stage today or ever?  The world stage... whatever it is, occupies space.

Xavier_Onassis » 21 Jun 2022, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 4:20 pm

WTF is "adapting to space"?  You cannot exist unless you occupy space.
Have you tried to sell franchises of who's who on the world stage today or ever?  The world stage... whatever it is, occupies space.

Space time continuum is an old concept, how does it work outside series parallel evolving of compounding combinations of DNA inhabiting space as ancestrally displaced here now?

It never did.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 2:20 pm

Why PG?

Is the OP afraid that Nikki Minaj actually doesn't have any balls?

The facts bitchslap you, retard.

Pubmed:
Background: The development of covid-19 vaccinations represents a notable scientific achievement. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding their possible detrimental impact on male fertility OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of covid-19 BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine on semen parameters among semen donors (SD).

Methods: 37 SD from three sperm banks that provided 220 samples, were included in that retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. BNT162b2 vaccination included two doses, and vaccination completion was scheduled 7 days after the second dose. The study included four phases: T0 - pre-vaccination baseline control, which encompassed 1-2 initial samples per SD; T1, T2 and T3 - short, intermediate, and long terms evaluations, respectively. Each included 1-3 semen samples per donor provided 15-45, 75-120, and over 150 days after vaccination completion, respectively. The primary endpoints were semen parameters. Three statistical analyses were conducted: 1) generalized estimated equation model; 2) first sample and 3) samples' mean of each donor per period were compared to T0.

Results: Repetitive measurements revealed -15.4% sperm concentration decrease on T2 (CI -25.5%-3.9%, p = 0.01) leading to total motile count 22.1% reduction (CI -35% - -6.6%, p = 0.007) compared to T0. Similarly, analysis of first semen sample only and samples' mean per donor resulted in concentration and TMC reductions on T2 compared to T0 - median decline of 12 million/ml and 31 million motile spermatozoa, respectively (p = 0.02 and 0.002 respectively) on first sample evaluation and median decline of 9.5×106 and 27.3 million motile spermatozoa (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively) on samples' mean examination. T3 evaluation demonstrated overall recovery. Semen volume and sperm motility were not impaired.
 

Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 9:15 am

The facts bitchslap you, retard.

Pubmed:
Background: The development of covid-19 vaccinations represents a notable scientific achievement. Nevertheless, concerns have been raised regarding their possible detrimental impact on male fertility OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of covid-19 BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine on semen parameters among semen donors (SD).

Methods: 37 SD from three sperm banks that provided 220 samples, were included in that retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. BNT162b2 vaccination included two doses, and vaccination completion was scheduled 7 days after the second dose. The study included four phases: T0 - pre-vaccination baseline control, which encompassed 1-2 initial samples per SD; T1, T2 and T3 - short, intermediate, and long terms evaluations, respectively. Each included 1-3 semen samples per donor provided 15-45, 75-120, and over 150 days after vaccination completion, respectively. The primary endpoints were semen parameters. Three statistical analyses were conducted: 1) generalized estimated equation model; 2) first sample and 3) samples' mean of each donor per period were compared to T0.

Results: Repetitive measurements revealed -15.4% sperm concentration decrease on T2 (CI -25.5%-3.9%, p = 0.01) leading to total motile count 22.1% reduction (CI -35% - -6.6%, p = 0.007) compared to T0. Similarly, analysis of first semen sample only and samples' mean per donor resulted in concentration and TMC reductions on T2 compared to T0 - median decline of 12 million/ml and 31 million motile spermatozoa, respectively (p = 0.02 and 0.002 respectively) on first sample evaluation and median decline of 9.5×106 and 27.3 million motile spermatozoa (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively) on samples' mean examination. T3 evaluation demonstrated overall recovery. Semen volume and sperm motility were not impaired.

I posted the conclusion, ya stupid ****.

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 9:16 am

I posted the conclusion, ya stupid ****.

Yes yes - it all works out in the end,fruitcake. Just a temporary inconvenience, at this stage of the study.      

Long term studies underway, lab rat.    


Here's a thought: Pretend you were NOT ideologically motivated to defend this experiment. See that?

Yeah, fruit: you see that.