His feelings are entirely irrelevant, as are your excuses for the insult of Jan 6thNeo » 21 Oct 2021, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ He doesn't recognize the committee as operating within legitimate parameters. It's a political fishing expedition. I would object to his refusal to talk with law enforcement, which the house committee certainly is not. These political stunts shouldn't be permitted. Benghazi, blow jobs, Jan 6th, all a waste of taxpayers money and nothing to do with the function of the legislative branch.


Huey » 21 Oct 2021, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I never touched that question Troll. If he is subpoenaed and refuses to testify he will have to suffer the consequences.
Thanks for asking, Troll.
Troll, perhaps you can explain why it is necessary when according to YOUR ARTICLE they have the evidence they need?
@Misty
I never touched that question Troll. If he is subpoenaed and refuses to testify he will have to suffer the consequences.
spare me your interpretations.Troll, perhaps you can explain why it is necessary when according to YOUR ARTICLE they have the evidence they need?
prove that you are worth my time.Vegas » 21 Oct 2021, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ GW/AI will mod. I almost got BV to make a deal with me...almost. Give him some encouragement. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room **** your upcoming excuses and your cowardly hiding.

His feelings are justified. Let them compel his "I don't recall" testimony using as much unwarranted force they deem needed. Just makes his reaction to the subpoena more valid.Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2021, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ His feelings are entirely irrelevant, as are your excuses for the insult of Jan 6th
Let idiots get away with **** like this
and you get
No interpretation, Trolly. I posted the paragraph straight from your article.
As for Bannon's involvement, the committee chair, Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, said he believed he had significant knowledge of the attack.Huey » 21 Oct 2021, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ No interpretation, Trolly. I posted the paragraph straight from your article.
At least I am man enough to offer a point when I cut and paste.
The valid reaction to a subpoena is to appear and tell the truth.Neo » 21 Oct 2021, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ His feelings are justified. Let them compel his "I don't recall" testimony using as much unwarranted force they deem needed. Just makes his reaction to the subpoena more valid.
Issued by law enforcement? Sure. Issued by a congressional lynching committee? Resistance is warranted if not demanded regardless of circumstance.Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2021, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ The valid reaction to a subpoena is to appear and tell the truth.
Neo » 21 Oct 2021, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Issued by law enforcement? Sure. Issued by a congressional lynching committee? Resistance is warranted if not demanded regardless of circumstance.
GW/AI will mod. I almost got BV to make a deal with me...almost. Give him some encouragement. - Liberal Forum Political Chat RoomBlackvegetable » 21 Oct 2021, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ prove that you are worth my time.
No more hissies, no demands.
Only evidence that you are capable.
Nice cherry picking from the paragraph I have posted once already. The next sentence you lying **** is What you left outBlackvegetable » 21 Oct 2021, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑ As for Bannon's involvement, the committee chair, Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, said he believed he had significant knowledge of the attack.
This?
It's ****, no different than Adam schiffs proof Trump colluded with Russia that never materialized. Evidence that Cheney has indeed caught some kind of disease from the company she has been keeping. Seems progressives penchant for lying is as contagious as covid19 delra.Huey » 21 Oct 2021, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice cherry picking from the paragraph I have posted once already. The next sentence you lying **** is What you left out
Cheney said the committee's investigation has found he had "substantial advanced knowledge of the plans for January 6th, and likely had an important role in formulating those plans."
That is a definitive statement. That is not an “I believe” statement. It is not a “We think” statement.
Dude, your lies are so easy to prove false. Ylu are not a smart man.
Resist away. There is a remedy for thatNeo » 21 Oct 2021, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Issued by law enforcement? Sure. Issued by a congressional lynching committee? Resistance is warranted if not demanded regardless of circumstance.
They will eventually compel a "I don't recall" response. That will be a huge win for the committee, likely the biggest one they will get. Might as well make them earn it.
That's a whole lot of **** in defense of Idiocy...Huey » 21 Oct 2021, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice cherry picking from the paragraph I have posted once already. The next sentence you lying **** is What you left out
Cheney said the committee's investigation has found he had "substantial advanced knowledge of the plans for January 6th, and likely had an important role in formulating those plans."
That is a definitive statement. That is not an “I believe” statement. It is not a “We think” statement.
Dude, your lies are so easy to prove false. Ylu are not a smart man.
Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2021, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ That's a whole lot of **** in defense of Idiocy...
Can you reduce the gibberish to a point?
QaNeon,Neo » 21 Oct 2021, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ They will eventually compel a "I don't recall" response. That will be a huge win for the committee, likely the biggest one they will get. Might as well make them earn it.
Perfectly fine. I want trump on the stand for 11 hours and he may say whatever he wantsNeo » 21 Oct 2021, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ They will eventually compel a "I don't recall" response. That will be a huge win for the committee, likely the biggest one they will get. Might as well make them earn it.