Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm

You're gonna need to take a shot at the questions now...

1. Show where I said that I didn't know who Potus 2008 was.

Alzheimers » 03 Nov 2021, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 8:42 pm

     
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm

1) What can we conclude, with certainty, about the threat posed to the State of Alabama by Hurricane Dorian with the aid of nothing more than this photograph?
(please keep answers focused and to the point.)



2) Read the following verbatim quote.

"But we started with a reduction of 25 percent in force structure," Mr. Cheney continued.

Who decimated the military?

am I supposed to give a ****?

Did you conspire with omh to concoct this spew? "let's see now, if I create and pose an unanswerable question which I myself know is not an answerable question, then feign complexity by tossing word confetti into the air in hopes that people believe I have intellect, maybe, just maybe...they will believe it!"

Stooping low there bubba. In the famous words of the great President Donald Trump, "You are a low-IQ individual".    
Do still takes baths with mom?

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 5:58 pm

Question was who..

But I am obliged to offer a polite golf clap and a forced smile for the effort.

You, playing golf?

That’s a civilised game.   

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 5:41 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm

1) What can we conclude, with certainty, about the threat posed to the State of Alabama by Hurricane Dorian with the aid of nothing more than this photograph?
(please keep answers focused and to the point.)



2) Read the following verbatim quote.

"But we started with a reduction of 25 percent in force structure," Mr. Cheney continued.

Who decimated the military?

@Huey  should be nailing this...

 

I note you are still afraid to discuss this on the threads where the conversation originated.  Lmao!

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 7:00 am

You'd think by now, @Huey  would have figured this out..

How hard can it be?

​​​​​​  I kicked your **** loinfo info undereducated *** and you will not live this down. I am smarter than you, wittier than you, and I am better at this than you. Kiss my **** ***, silver spoon. Next time to search for a new forum home remember this *** kicking....yap! ...

Yesterday must have been really tough for you yesterday.  The *** whoopins you received were epic.  So of course I expected a tribute thread.  I thank you for it.  Proves how butthurt you are. 

Both of the threads in question are available on the forum.  We were on one yesterday and another recently.  The answer to both questions are on those threads.  If you are unable to discuss the answers just say so.  

When you start a "dedicated" thread on a topic that has already has it's own thread it is a sign you are lying and running. 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 7:29 am

If @Huey  has already answered the questions, he could just cut & paste it..

Unless he lied about having answered the questions.


 

 

Umm, I just bumped both threads.  Already answered.  You want to discuss those topics go ahead on the threads where the answers are.  And you can explain exactly what issue you have with the answers given on those thread.  In one case the answer to your question was posted long before you entered that thread. 

Alzheimers » 03 Nov 2021, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 5:25 pm

ATTENTION ALL READERS... DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS SICK HUMAN
LITTERTALLY PULL THE STAGE OUT FROM UNDER HIS FEET.
THIIS SADISTIC PIG IS OFF HIS MEDICATIION

FOR THE LOVE OF THE COMMINITY IGNORE BV

 

BV is in what we call epic meltdown mode.  When he creates a tribute thread or another thread on a dedicated topic it means he got an epic *** stomping the day before.  When he can't control a thread and reframe answers he also does this.  I have posted the the links to the original threads where he lost the original argument and the answers to his questions are posted. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm

I don't think I can make these any easier, people!

easier to do what? Ignore the biological self evident way life works exponentially by the numbers present in ever changing form..

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 8:50 am

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 8:42 am

He doesn't realize I have him (no ****) right were I wanted him.

This stays...

In this format you are OBLIGED to answer the questions asked, and any insistence that you have done so will be readily dismissed.

This CHALLENGE has been up for more than 17 hrs and I've received ONE half correct answer. From someone apparently far manlier than you..

(Take a curtsy @Cannonpointer  )

You might call this a Narratives Killing Floor...






 

 

I am not obligated to do anything, Nancy Boy.  I have posted to this thread links to where the answers to your questions are answered.  

And only a coward, a ******, starts a tribute thread where the target can not answer lies.  

Next. 17 hours ago I was not online. You knew I was not.  So again, in ****** fashion, you start it when I am not here.  There is no challenge because 1 I no longer enter challenges with you. You have always lost and never honor them.  Next, those questions have already been answered as I showed this morning.

You can PG this all you like.  It will show you are a coward and it will be right back.  You can't ban me because you claim you are looking for an answer. 
 

BV is in what we call epic meltdown mode.  When he creates a tribute thread or another thread on a dedicated topic it means he got an epic *** stomping the day before.  When he can't control a thread and reframe answers he also does this.  I have posted the the links to the original threads where he lost the original argument and the answers to his questions are posted. 

Yesterday must have been really tough for you yesterday.  The *** whoopins you received were epic.  So of course I expected a tribute thread.  I thank you for it.  Proves how butthurt you are. 

Both of the threads in question are available on the forum.  We were on one yesterday and another recently.  The answer to both questions are on those threads.  If you are unable to discuss the answers just say so.  

When you start a "dedicated" thread on a topic that has already has it's own thread it is a sign you are lying and running. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2021, 3:54 pm

1) What can we conclude, with certainty, about the threat posed to the State of Alabama by Hurricane Dorian with the aid of nothing more than this photograph?
(please keep answers focused and to the point.)



2) Read the following verbatim quote.

"But we started with a reduction of 25 percent in force structure," Mr. Cheney continued.

Who decimated the military?
 
 
 

 

And why would you move this to PG when the answers are on the threads I bumped.  Not a real man, are you?


Umm, I just bumped both threads.  Already answered.  You want to discuss those topics go ahead on the threads where the answers are.  And you can explain exactly what issue you have with the answers given on those thread.  In one case the answer to your question was posted long before you entered that thread. 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am

I note you are still afraid to discuss this on the threads where the conversation originated.  Lmao!

Not at all.

You ran from answering the questions there....now you are doing so here...
 

 

I am not answering answers I have given multiple times over the years on this thread.  You started a thread because you are running and not man enough to discuss them on the threads in question.  You can't control the debate nor can you reframe it if you do that.

So when you find your balls you may go back to those threads.  I made sure when the purge came they were still accessible because I knew you would do this.  I am not as dumb as you think I am and YOU are nowhere near as smart as YOU think you are.  

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am

I note you are still afraid to discuss this on the threads where the conversation originated.  Lmao!

Not at all.

You ran from answering the questions there....now you are doing so here...
 

 

Only a ****** asks a question then moves the answer to PG:

I am not answering answers I have given multiple times over the years on this thread.  You started a thread because you are running and not man enough to discuss them on the threads in question.  You can't control the debate nor can you reframe it if you do that.

So when you find your balls you may go back to those threads.  I made sure when the purge came they were still accessible because I knew you would do this.  I am not as dumb as you think I am and YOU are nowhere near as smart as YOU think you are.  

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:17 am

I am not answering answers I have given multiple times over the years on this thread.

This is the worst bluff on the innertubes..


It would take FAR less effort to answer the questions (for the first time) than it does typing extensive exegeses justifying your lying and cowardice.

It is a Flag of Unconditional Surrender..

@Huey  

 

Sorry, a few minutes ago I answered your question and you pussied out and move the answer to PG.  

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am

I note you are still afraid to discuss this on the threads where the conversation originated.  Lmao!

Not at all.

You ran from answering the questions there....now you are doing so here...
 

 

Only a ****** asks a question then moves the answer to PG:

I am not answering answers I have given multiple times over the years on this thread.  You started a thread because you are running and not man enough to discuss them on the threads in question.  You can't control the debate nor can you reframe it if you do that.

So when you find your balls you may go back to those threads.  I made sure when the purge came they were still accessible because I knew you would do this.  I am not as dumb as you think I am and YOU are nowhere near as smart as YOU think you are.  

This is why I am not going to play on this thread any longer.  Any answer you can't control will be moved to PG.  You know where to find your answers.  Some are a couple of year old. 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:17 am

This is the worst bluff on the innertubes..


It would take FAR less effort to answer the questions (for the first time) than it does typing extensive exegeses justifying your lying and cowardice.

It is a Flag of Unconditional Surrender..

Define what makes results self evident for each point of view of each member of the homo sapien population in the atmosphere now? Energy flows path of least resistance between all things universally present in series parallel points of actively displaced regardless inorganic or ancestral.

^^^^^ this is inclusive without exception. ity bit anything to everything universally present in shape or form from subatomic material to DNA matter.

Oh, go ahead and send this to peanut gallery. your ideology is imploding and there isn't anything your we can do to stop it short of bringing extinction to this species.

Your cowardice is validated again. You have nothing real to stand your time mutually evolving as equally displaced by reproductivity of genetic outcomes so far.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:08 am

Huey » 04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2021, 9:05 am

I note you are still afraid to discuss this on the threads where the conversation originated.  Lmao!

Not at all.

You ran from answering the questions there....now you are doing so here...
 

 

Only a ****** asks a question then moves the answer to PG:

I am not answering answers I have given multiple times over the years on this thread.  You started a thread because you are running and not man enough to discuss them on the threads in question.  You can't control the debate nor can you reframe it if you do that.

So when you find your balls you may go back to those threads.  I made sure when the purge came they were still accessible because I knew you would do this.  I am not as dumb as you think I am and YOU are nowhere near as smart as YOU think you are.  

This is why I am not going to play on this thread any longer.  Any answer you can't control will be moved to PG.  You know where to find your answers.  Some are a couple of year old.