Liberal Forum

Merrick Garland Has More Than Enough to Investigate Trump

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... story.html

Garland doesn't want to be prosecuted when the adults take control back from the dims

slideman » 30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am

Hillary and Hunter did not attempt to overthrow the government of the United States to the best of my knowledge.
Trump did

He did?  When where provide evidence 
 

slideman » 30 Mar 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2022, 11:48 am

Merrick Garland Has More Than Enough to Investigate Trump

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... story.html

Do it!  Isn’t that what the January 6 committee is doing?

B.See » 29 Mar 2022, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Mar 2022, 10:16 pm

'Do your job!' Jan. 6 Committee member gives Merrick Garland a 'blunt' message - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism

While voting in favor of holding Trump allies Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino in criminal contempt of Congress, she urged Garland to act to follow through on the committee's recommendation of criminal charges.

"The Department of Justice must act swiftly," she said. "I will echo what my colleagues have already said, but more bluntly: Attorney General Garland, do your job so that we can do ours."

Ex-Prosecutor suspects DOJ isn’t working with Congress because they are 'compromised' - Raw Story

Trump could be arrested or indicted based on evidence in judge’s ruling: Former federal prosecutor - Raw Story

COULD be but WON'T.  The spineless will be EQUALLY culpable when democracy dies.

I see what's happening here! garland obviously is getting DEATH THREATS from the Trump Criminal cartel. He's FROZEN IN FEAR!  
 

B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am

Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6.  Here are some of the headlines I've collected:

Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org

"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists

Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters

Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'

Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?

Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump

LMAO@YOU.
Your list is a bunch of **** MSM propaganda trying desperately to con American voter's before the midterms .....Luckily an overwhelming 80% of Americans no longer Trust the Dems/MSM and have overwhelmingly pivoted towards alternative media sources.
And I have to thank the Dem party for the majority of Americans who are now no longer fooled by this unholy marriage between the Dem party and the MSM.
 

The latest:

'Duh': Harvard Law School professor explains why prosecuting Trump is an absolute no-brainer - Raw Story

Jan. 6 committee ratchets up pressure on Merrick Garland to charge former Trump aides with contempt - Raw Story

Merrick Garland is ignoring the DOJ's original mission: Battling seditionists like Donald Trump | Salon.com

DEPT. OF TALK IS CHEAP

Biden’s DOJ is finally expanding criminal investigation into Jan. 6 insurrection: report  (or so they say)

DOJ Calls Every Reporter In DC To Pinky Swear That It Isn't Blowing Jan. 6 Investigation - Wonkette

'What's taking so long?' Reporter asks Merrick Garland why Mark Meadows hasn't been indicted yet - Raw Story

Jan. 6 panel puts Garland in 'precarious' spot, ups pressure | AP News

‘Very damning’ evidence against Trump puts pressure on DOJ to take action: Michael Steele - Raw Story

Watch: Reporter asks Merrick Garland ‘What’s taking so long’ with Mark Meadows contempt of Congress referral? - Alternet.org

Garland is making republicans look innocent. I hear right wing nuts everyday sing his praises.

Merrick Garland has been handed a roadmap to indict Trump: former impeachment counsel - Raw Story

Jan. 6 committee member laments criminal referrals to the Justice Department have 'dropped into a void' - Raw Story

B the loser in life chink whore

He’s got the chyna virus so does Nancy coincidence?

...beginning to think we need a new a.g.

How much more evidence does Merrick Garland need to indict Trump? - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism

‘This sucks’: ex-RNC chairman goes on angry rant about DOJ's 15-month investigation of Trump's coup - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism

House panel: Justice Dept. 'obstructing' Trump records probe

House committee wants to know why Justice Department is blocking its investigation of Trump records

Merrick Garland 'Failing the People' Over Donald Trump, Joaquin Castro Says

DOJ appears ready to launch a probe into Trump for bringing classified documents to Mar-a-Lago: report - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism   RIIIIIIGHT.

MEANWHILE:

Manhattan DA drops a bombshell: Trump criminal investigation is still ongoing - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism    RIIIIIIIIGHT.

B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am

Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6.  Here are some of the headlines I've collected:

Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org

"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists

Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters

Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'

Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?

Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump

@Blackvegetable  

Thats your boy.
 

The latest from the Department of Belly Up:

'Copious' evidence of Trump's criminality still may not force Merrick Garland to act: former prosecutor - Raw Story

Why Hasn’t the Justice Department Charged Mark Meadows With Contempt? - Lawfare

'What are they afraid of?' Morning Joe accuses Manhattan DA of letting Trump skate on 'crime after crime' - Raw Story

B.See still eating that nothing burger

Well, unlike you, at least I don' t eat Putin d........ fascist john boy.

Michael Cohen, Manhattan DA’s Star Witness, Says Indict Trump Now or I’m Out

Michael Cohen threatens to stop cooperating with Manhattan DA unless he charges Trump this month | Salon.com

Jan. 6 is looking 'more premeditated' — and 'it makes what Merrick Garland should do a lot clearer': legal expert - Raw Story

FULL SCALE CHICKEN-****:

Meadows Gets Off On Contempt Charges After Being SEEN Burning Documents

DOJ Won't Charge Mark Meadows, Dan Scavino For Contempt Of Congress | HuffPost Latest News

Jan. 6 Committee Rips Garland's Failure Indict Meadows and Scavino: 'Rewards a Continued Attack On the Rule Of Law'

Adam Schiff says it's 'puzzling' and 'deeply troubling' that the DOJ did not prosecute Meadows and Scavino

MEANWHILE:

Former AG Eric Holder Says There is 'Sufficient Factual Information' to Indict Trump RIGHT NOW!

But with GARLAND at the helm it's HIGHLY UNLIKELY, because.... CHICKEN-****.

Expert: Liz Cheney is 'leaving breadcrumbs' for Merrick Garland to start charging Trump's circle with crimes

Merrick Garland is Obviously Scared **** But Jan 6 Revelations May Leave Him Little Choice

Expert: There's a 'whole host of evidence' Trump's team knew they lost and conspired to overturn the election

‘Do your  [fkng] job or resign’: Ex-federal prosecutor urges Merrick Garland to either indict Donald Trump or quit - Alternet.org

Jan. 6 committee makes the case clear for Merrick Garland: FAILURE to prosecute Trump IS political | Salon.com

A angry letter to US Attorney, Audrey Strauss re: trump prosecution

Failure to convict is a betrayal of duty, honor and America

Prosecute Trump a "Tough Decision"? Not At All! No One Has Ever Been More Important to Prosecute!

Trump might have to be prosecuted to save American democracy, an expert on authoritarianism argues

B.See » 02 Apr 2022, 2:47 am » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2022, 2:47 am

The latest:
My gay lover Maurice gave birth this morning to a very healthy, 5 pound, 7 ounce BABY TURD..!!!  . We are both absolutely BURSTING WITH GAY PRIDE as you would expect...!!! 

PLEASE TAKE A BOW..!!! BOTH OF YOU HAVE HAD TO OVERCOME SO MUCH TO GET TO WHERE YOU ARE TODAY...!!!    


 
 

B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am

Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6.  Here are some of the headlines I've collected:

Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org

"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists

Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters

Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'

Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?

Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump

Merrick Garland is a certified bone-smoking squish.  He's YOUR guy - enjoy!
 

and these trolls wonder why their asses are banned outright from my newer threads.

Jim Clyburn fears DOJ isn't moving fast enough on Trump's election schemes - Raw Story

Watergate lawyer: 'There's nothing worse than not proceeding' in Justice Department's case against Trump

Public pressure on Merrick Garland to prosecute Donald Trump may be approaching a breaking point

Harvard Law prof calls upon Merrick Garland to charge Trump under mob racketeering law

MEANWHILE:

Opinion: Donald Trump is almost certainly going to get away with treason. But other consequences may be coming

If US Attorney General Merrick Garland does not bring an indictment against the former president, he will greenlight future White Houses to commit widespread crimes, said Kimberly Wehle, an ABC News legal analyst. There will “literally” be no more checks and no more balances.

She isn’t alone. Others have made the same case. Together, these seekers of justice are getting louder, as they anticipate the possibility of Donald Trump getting away with his serial acts of sedition, mutiny and treason.

Right. As I've said above, I believe Garland is a chicken-****. Even the skeptical authors of the above stories have far more faith in him than I.