Not really.... you're not just a spamming troll... you're also a sensitive troll... your feelings get hurt when people point out that no one gives a **** about your spam... that's good to know...B.See » 26 Jun 2022, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ and these trolls wonder why their asses are banned outright from my newer threads..

You better stick to your peanut threads with your spam.... no one gives a ****.... troll!B.See » 08 Jul 2022, 11:19 pm » wrote: ↑THE CONTINUED **** OF THE DOJ
or "Democrats STILL bringing knives to a gunfight"
.'Very big deal': Former J6 Committee investigator says messages sent to Cassidy Hutchinson should be referred to DOJ - Raw Story
Maddow: There is new urgency for Merrick Garland to take action against Trump's operation - Raw Story
The DOJ is going to make Mark Meadows a suspect or target of an investigation:(???) Ex-Justice Department official - Raw Story
Adam Kinzinger wants Justice Department to work faster
Washington Post: DOJ 'should conduct a criminal investigation' into Donald Trump - Alternet.org
Alberto Gonzales says DOJ must investigate Trump for at least 3 specific crimes - Raw Story -
MEANWHILE:
Merrick Garland says he’s ‘watching’ Jan 6 hearings amid calls for Trump to face criminal charges

Heavy duty military weapons? Zip ties and flag poles? The military style dress can be purchased at any surplus shop, not a yuge mystery there either. Only one person was shot that day, an unarmed female veteran killed by a DC cop with a long record of incompetence. Hundreds of law enforcement there, only one felt lethal force was justified.razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ The concerns about Garland are justified..... though there is still so much on the table under investigation. I want Trump and Trump people to experience a ton of prosecutions and find out who has been funding the big lies and funding the heavy duty military style weapons that were seen on Jan 6th plus the military style dress and who funded the hotel accommodations .
B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑ Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6. Here are some of the headlines I've collected:
Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org
"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists
Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters
Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'
Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?
Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump
slideman » 30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Hillary and Hunter did not attempt to overthrow the government of the United States to the best of my knowledge.
Trump did
There are no Republicans on the committee. Cheney was stripped of her membership. The other clown isn't running again and wouldn't get the gop endorsement if he did.razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ The evidence is mounting with the republicans on the committee pushing for prosecution ............ but they are not stupid thus will act accordingly no matter how long it takes.
So what's stopping them, dickhead? You've got FULL CONTROL of Congress and a completely biased kangaroo court "investigation" that PURPOSELY avoiding ANY real exposure OF THE FACTS!razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ The concerns about Garland are justified..... though there is still so much on the table under investigation. I want Trump and Trump people to experience a ton of prosecutions and find out who has been funding the big lies and funding the heavy duty military style weapons that were seen on Jan 6th plus the military style dress and who funded the hotel accommodations .
It would be best to bust and prosecute Trump/Trump officials on whatever to prevent any of them running for office.
Then continue the investigation for as long as it takes and no matter the cost to stop this crap.
This crap must stop STAT: ANTI AMERICAN ALEC RINO GOP Party which has declared a 24/7 :--- War On Good Wages aka Right To Work Legislation
--- War against AFFORDABLE Medical Insurance and Single Payer
--- War On Medicare
--- War On Medicaid
--- War on public education and Higher Education
--- War On Social Security Insurance
--- War on the economy through Supply Side Wreckanomics
--- War against women--- War on the VA and Veterans Benefits --- War on Voters Rights = VOTER SUPPRESSION
--- War on strict gun regulations
--- War On National Monuments/Parks
--- War on the press
--- War on the USA Postal Service
--- War On Environmental Cleanliness
--- War On USA Jobs through Free Trade Agreements and Leveraged Buyout Scams
--- War for Oil Control Worldwide
--- War on truth about global warming/climate change
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2010/0 ... l-machine/ Arrest all who are engaged in voter suppression / trying to squash the right to vote.
No problemo, razoo. Just the facts.razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks B.See for your deep interest is USA political scandal ........ the swamp by now is so toxic.
Appreciate your thoughts on the subject, Razoo. There is some thoughts among the left as to whether indictment and prosecutions would be a wise move to make. I'm of the camp that it is IMPERATIVE that Garland does so, win lose or draw.razoo » 22 Jul 2022, 4:28 am » wrote: ↑ Don't know where Garland will take this. An attorney general cannot discuss a case openly with the public.
Is there a chance of a Federal Grand Jury Indictment? As someone who has no legal background I WOULD SAY YES. Some perjury........who knows for sure?
Circumstantial and Hard evidence = I would say some of both.
Jan 6th was well orchestrated, some of the people were trained, people's lives were threatened big time, of course we know some employees died and/or were seriously injured.
Does Trump have the credentials to train......NO. Does one of his advisors who more than once claimed to be an advisor........... yes that would be Erik Prince. Is Prince a person of interest? No clue.
Merrick Garland is a pothead, drug addicted dope. Tell Brain Dead Biden to FIRE HIM. Trump would have done it long ago by now.B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑ Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6. Here are some of the headlines I've collected:
Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org
"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists
Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters
Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'
Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?
Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump
B.See » 16 Sep 2022, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ I'm so TIRED of articles saying what COULD or SHOULD be done regarding TRUMP'S MANY CRIMES.
lol... and you wonder why people call you a dumb TROLL...Here are number of them...

No, actually when WILLFULLY IGNORANT, alternate reality, election denying jackbooted MAGATS like YOU try to call people "dumb" I laugh my *** off.Jantje_Smit » 16 Sep 2022, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ lol... and you wonder why people call you a dumb TROLL...
Good question NF. In some ways he APPEARS to be going forward with... something... and the next moment one begins to wonder whether it's all smoke and mirrors.nuckinfutz » 17 Sep 2022, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Did Garland LOSE HIS BALLS? Like Mueller?
Or has he been bribed to throw the fight?mg:
Evidence of what... TROLL?
I'm still telling you that no one gives a ****...And what the **** are YOU still doing... TROLL??![]()
![]()
