What's Up with Merrick Garland

User avatar
By B.See
30 Nov 2021 3:27 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4
User avatar
Jantje_Smit
26 Jun 2022 6:01 am
User avatar
      
6,471 posts
B.See » 26 Jun 2022, 5:49 am » wrote: and these trolls wonder why their asses are banned outright from my newer threads.. 
Not really.... you're not just a spamming troll... you're also a sensitive troll... your feelings get hurt when people point out that no one gives a **** about your spam... that's good to know...

:die:  

Image
 
 
In memory of Pumpkins

Image
User avatar
Neo
9 Jul 2022 8:34 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: The concerns about Garland are justified..... though there is still so much on the table under investigation. I want Trump and Trump people to experience a ton of prosecutions and find out who has been funding the big lies and funding the heavy duty military style weapons that were seen on Jan 6th plus the military style dress  and who funded the hotel accommodations .
 
Heavy duty military weapons? Zip ties and flag poles? The military style dress can be purchased at any surplus shop, not a yuge mystery there either. Only one person was shot that day, an unarmed female veteran killed by a DC cop with a long record of incompetence. Hundreds of law enforcement there, only one felt lethal force was justified. 
 
User avatar
NEILCAR
9 Jul 2022 9:05 am
User avatar
   
800 posts
slideman » 30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: Hillary and Hunter did not attempt to overthrow the government of the United States to the best of my knowledge.
Trump did

If you have proof, I would be happy to look at it ....

There are no charges against Trump for insurrection because they cannot prove it ... 
User avatar
Neo
9 Jul 2022 9:19 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: The evidence is mounting with the republicans on the committee pushing for prosecution ............ but they are not stupid thus will act accordingly no matter how long it takes.
There are no Republicans on the committee. Cheney was stripped of her membership. The other clown isn't running again and wouldn't get the gop endorsement if he did. 
 
User avatar
Zeets2
9 Jul 2022 9:25 am
User avatar
      
7,227 posts
razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: The concerns about Garland are justified..... though there is still so much on the table under investigation. I want Trump and Trump people to experience a ton of prosecutions and find out who has been funding the big lies and funding the heavy duty military style weapons that were seen on Jan 6th plus the military style dress  and who funded the hotel accommodations .

It would be best to bust and prosecute Trump/Trump officials on whatever to prevent any of them running for office.
Then continue the investigation for as long as it takes and no matter the cost to stop this crap.

This crap must stop STAT: ANTI AMERICAN ALEC RINO GOP Party which has declared a 24/7 :--- War On Good Wages aka Right To Work Legislation 
--- War against AFFORDABLE Medical Insurance and Single Payer 
--- War On Medicare 
--- War On Medicaid 
--- War on public education and Higher Education 
--- War On Social Security Insurance 
--- War on the economy through Supply Side Wreckanomics 
--- War against women--- War on the VA and Veterans Benefits --- War on Voters Rights = VOTER SUPPRESSION 
--- War on strict gun regulations 
--- War On National Monuments/Parks 
--- War on the press 
--- War on the USA Postal Service 
--- War On Environmental Cleanliness 
--- War On USA Jobs through Free Trade Agreements and Leveraged Buyout Scams 
--- War for Oil Control Worldwide 
--- War on truth about global warming/climate change 
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2010/0 ... l-machine/ Arrest all who are engaged in voter suppression / trying to squash the right to vote.
So what's stopping them, dickhead?  You've got FULL CONTROL of Congress and a completely biased kangaroo court "investigation" that PURPOSELY avoiding ANY real exposure OF THE FACTS!  

WHERE IS THE TESTIMONY OF PELOSI AND BOWSER EXPLAINING WHY THEY REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE 10,000 ADDITIONAL SECURITY THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD THEM THEY WOULD NEED?  Trump did everything in his power to keep the demonstration peaceful DESPITE the infiltration of left-wing insurgents like Antifa and FBI informants that were planted in the group WHO ENCOURAGED AND INCITED THE RIOT!

Address THOSE facts, AND SHUT THE **** UP WITH YOUR LIES!  Americans ARE NOT as dumb as you OR as dumb as you wish they were!
 
User avatar
B.See
20 Jul 2022 3:32 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
razoo » 09 Jul 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: Thanks B.See for your deep interest is USA political scandal ........ the swamp by now is so toxic.
No problemo, razoo. Just the facts.

Y'know, there's been a few movies that sort of touched upon what we're seeing irl today. I think Rolling Stone did an article (back near the start of Trump's maladministration) citing about a dozen movies that even grazed the surface. 

But if only SIX years ago, a director had produced a movie in which a sitting 'resident (in Trump's case) and Republican office holders in red states and in Congress, plotted a coup and incited an insurrection against democracy, most viewers would've expected that movie to end in some hard JAIL time for the ringleader and his co-conspirators (if not WORSE). 

Doubtful the plot of ANY such movie would've included a political party and congressional lawmakers DEFENDING the insurrection AFTER the fact, calling it "legitimate political protest" or that most of their constituency would be on BOARD with the act, or that the HEAD PERPETRATOR IN CHIEF would STILL be running free, trying to INCITE MORE OF THE SAME -

While a **** AG hiding from VIEW:

Lawmakers say DOJ 'must bring charges' against Trump amid new Jan. 6 bombshells - Raw Story

Democrats call on Merrick Garland to do something: Lawmakers says DOJ must bring Jan. 6 charges | Salon.com

Legal expert offers roadmap to indict Trump on manslaughter charges - Raw Story

'The gravest circumstances': Political scientist urges Justice Department to prosecute Donald Trump - Alternet.org

Rep. Adam Schiff sounds alarm at Justice Department's 'unprecedented' lack of action on Jan. 6

 
 
 
User avatar
B.See
25 Jul 2022 4:11 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
razoo » 22 Jul 2022, 4:28 am » wrote: Don't know where Garland will take this. An attorney general cannot discuss a case openly with the public.

Is there a chance of a Federal Grand Jury Indictment? As someone who has no legal background I WOULD SAY YES. Some perjury........who knows for sure?

Circumstantial and Hard evidence = I would say some of both.

Jan 6th was well orchestrated, some of the people were trained, people's lives were threatened big time, of course we know some employees died and/or were seriously injured.

Does Trump have the credentials to train......NO. Does one of his advisors who more than once claimed to be an advisor........... yes that would be Erik Prince. Is Prince a person of interest? No clue.
Appreciate your thoughts on the subject, Razoo. There is some thoughts among the left as to whether indictment and prosecutions would be a wise move to make. I'm of the camp that it is IMPERATIVE that Garland does so, win lose or draw.

Because failure to do so would send the message that Trump (and others who'd do likewise) is above the law.

Though frankly, I personally think Garland is just scared ****.

MEANWHILE A CHICKEN IN EVERY PLOT:

Merrick Garland said he’s ‘watching’ Jan 6 hearings amid calls for Trump to face criminal charges

watching...........

Legal experts nudge Merrick Garland: Donald Trump is 'running for office as criminal defense strategy'

Garland Has 'Probable Cause on Steroids' for Indicting Trump: Kirschner

Rep. Adam Schiff sounds alarm at Justice Department's 'unprecedented' lack of action on Jan. 6

Ex-DOJ Officials: Jan. 6 Committee Has Made Case to Prosecute Trump

'Sure as hell hope Merrick Garland has an open criminal investigation into Trump': J6 Committee member

Sharp Contrasts With Other Jan. 6 Inquiries Increase Pressure on Garland


And from the DEPT OF WTF???

Maddow Obtains Memo from Merrick Garland Extending Trump-Era Policy on Investigating Presidential Candidates


DOJ's election threats task force gets grilled after securing just one conviction despite more than 1,000 referrals


 
User avatar
Skans
25 Jul 2022 4:17 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6.  Here are some of the headlines I've collected:

Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org

"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists

Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters

Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'

Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?

Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump
Merrick Garland is a pothead, drug addicted dope.  Tell Brain Dead Biden to FIRE HIM.  Trump would have done it long ago by now.
 
User avatar
Jantje_Smit
16 Sep 2022 6:40 am
User avatar
      
6,471 posts
B.See » 16 Sep 2022, 6:14 am » wrote: I'm so TIRED of articles saying what COULD or SHOULD be done regarding TRUMP'S MANY CRIMES.  
Here are number of them...
lol... and you wonder why people call you a dumb TROLL...

:rofl:  

Image
 
 
 
In memory of Pumpkins

Image
User avatar
B.See
17 Sep 2022 7:52 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
Jantje_Smit » 16 Sep 2022, 6:40 am » wrote: lol... and you wonder why people call you a dumb TROLL...

Image
No, actually when WILLFULLY IGNORANT, alternate reality, election denying jackbooted MAGATS like YOU try to call people "dumb" I laugh my *** off.

I'm posting topics and backing them up with EVIDENCE.  And what the **** are YOU still doing... TROLL?? Image   Image  
 
 
User avatar
B.See
17 Sep 2022 7:55 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
Ex-federal prosecutor urges Merrick Garland to ignore NON-EXISTING '60-day Rule' AND INDICT DONALD TRUMP NOW

Donald Trump is not on the ballot for the November midterm elections, but that has not alleviated the United States Department of Justice's reluctance to indict him for one or more crimes that he is alleged to have committed during and after his White House tenure.

On Thursday, ex-federal prosecutor Shan Wu explained in The Daily Beast why adhering to the so-called "60-day rule" is unjustified and pressed Attorney General Merrick Garland to pursue Trump. 

"To start with, Garland and the DOJ need to tell the American public that no such rule exists. That’s right—the rule doesn’t exist. It’s the DOJ’s equivalent of an urban myth. No actual law or written policy at the DOJ mentions anything about not doing anything within 60 days of anything vis-à-vis criminal charges, involving elections," Wu wrote.

DOJ now investigating every element of Trump's 'sprawling legal machine': report - Raw Story
 
 
User avatar
nuckin futz
17 Sep 2022 8:07 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
Did Garland LOSE HIS BALLS? Like Mueller?
Or has he been bribed to throw the fight?
:omg:   :evil:  
 
User avatar
B.See
17 Sep 2022 8:16 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
nuckinfutz » 17 Sep 2022, 8:07 pm » wrote: Did Garland LOSE HIS BALLS? Like Mueller?
Or has he been bribed to throw the fight?
Imagemg:   Image
Good question NF. In some ways he APPEARS to be going forward with... something... and the next moment one begins to wonder whether it's all smoke and mirrors.

Numerous legal analysts and experts are sounding the alarm, INDICT TRUMP'S *** NOW, there ALREADY ARE sufficient enough CRIMES, to prosecute him, even WITHOUT those stolen top secret documents he (and his side pocket judge) have and ARE CONTINUING to compromise America with, and still America waits.

Maybe he's thinking doing so now would fuel MAGA turnout at the polls come the midterms.
User avatar
Jantje_Smit
18 Sep 2022 5:32 am
User avatar
      
6,471 posts
B.See » 17 Sep 2022, 7:52 pm » wrote: I'm posting topics and backing them up with EVIDENCE.  
Evidence of what... TROLL?
And what the **** are YOU still doing... TROLL?? Image   :rofl:  
I'm still telling you that no one gives a ****...

:die:  

Image
 

 
 
In memory of Pumpkins

Image
1 2 3 4

Who is online

In total there are 6205 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 6188 guests
Registered users: jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer
Bots: DuckDuckBot, okhttp, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Adsbot, proximic, Googlebot, ADmantX, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search