Liberal Forum

nefarious101 » 30 Mar 2022, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑

30 Mar 2022, 6:16 am

"orange man bad" again....save us from reality and "mean tweets".....why won't someone do what fake news says needs to be done?...because it's fake?...yep!

just like the fake news progressive idiocracy links you continue to use

Why does B.See keep leaving out the evidence part?   For some reason he thinks a zillion links are evidence.


B.See suffers from severe TDS.

roadkill » 18 Sep 2022, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2022, 5:44 am

Why does B.See keep leaving out the evidence part?   For some reason he thinks a zillion links are evidence.

B.See suffers from severe TDS.

B.See hates Trump so bad he'll post a ton of links that have no evidence and then convince himself that it's evidence cause he wants it to be that way.

If it's negative about Trump B.See will automatically believe it without questioning the lack of facts.   aka:   TDS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R28hqYM_MA
 
 

LOLZ!      

MORE **** deflections and personal attacks. PROOF POSITIVE why these moronic TROLLS aren't allowed to post in my pg threads.

In latest news:

DoJ Rips Trump-Appointed Judge's Ruling in Mar-a-Lago Probe

Justice Department asks appeals court to block Trump judge's Mar-a-Lago ruling

DOJ may be looking past J6 and are on to something much bigger — Trump's attempt to overthrow American democracy: Adam Schiff 

Jantje_Smit » 16 Sep 2022, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2022, 6:40 am

lol... and you wonder why people call you a dumb TROLL...

 

I know right...B.See and the dems are exactly everything they accuses others of. He can't let go of his projection threads.   lol
 

B.See » 19 Sep 2022, 1:35 am » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2022, 1:35 am

LOLZ!      

MORE **** deflections and personal attacks. PROOF POSITIVE why these moronic TROLLS aren't allowed to post in my pg threads. 

I didn't deflect, I actually took the trouble of answering your questions... you're the one deflecting by not answering mine... coward... proof positive why you need a safe space...

In latest spam:

No one gives a ****... TROLL...

 


 

 

B.See » 19 Sep 2022, 1:35 am » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2022, 1:35 am

LOLZ!      

MORE **** deflections and personal attacks. PROOF POSITIVE why these moronic TROLLS aren't allowed to post in my pg threads.

In latest news:

DoJ Rips Trump-Appointed Judge's Ruling in Mar-a-Lago Probe

Justice Department asks appeals court to block Trump judge's Mar-a-Lago ruling

DOJ may be looking past J6 and are on to something much bigger — Trump's attempt to overthrow American democracy: Adam Schiff 

Hey B.Hidin'...when will you post evidence that you claim you have on Trump?   If you don't all yer fake threads will be failed.

roadkill » 19 Sep 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2022, 9:39 am

Hey B.Hidin'...when will you post evidence that you claim you have on Trump?   If you don't all yer fake threads will be failed.

the **** **** has nothing

FJB » 19 Sep 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2022, 9:58 am

the **** **** has nothing

Of course he doesn't...that's why he won't respond.  We both know if B.Hidin' had evidence on Trump he would be screaming it from the mtn top.


lol

THE SPINELESS MEDIOCRITY OF MERRICK GARLAND:

Let's face it. If ANY Democrat had pulled an attempted armed insurrection against the nation's capitol - against Democracy itself, or pulled not even half the **** Trump and his crony co-conspirators have pulled, Republicans would've locked them ALL up... LONG ago.

Yet, in spite of crimes committed, known of, and even more being REVEALED as we speak, chicken-**** Merrick Garland sits on his hands doing essentially NOTHING.

And I've become convinced he'll DO nothing.

Fkng PATHETIC:

"The weakness is off the charts": Ex-prosecutors sound alarm on team Garland assigned to Trump case - Salon

Time for the DOJ to stop playing Trump's reindeer games; and indict him: former federal prosecutor - Raw Story

Merrick Garland urged to act after Trump's defiant response to congressional subpoena - Raw

Mary Trump warned of ‘much worse things’ to happen if Trump indictment decision wasn't made before 2024 announcement - The Independent

Former Trump attorney: Ignore partisan games and indict Trump - Raw Story

Legal experts say DOJ will lose credibility if it doesn't indict Trump: You have to bring a case - Raw Story

DOJ case against Trump “gets stronger and stronger” after latest filing - Salon
 

B.See » 17 Nov 2022, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 10:02 pm

THE SPINELESS MEDIOCRITY OF MERRICK GARLAND:

Let's face it. If ANY Democrat had pulled an attempted armed insurrection against the nation's capitol - against Democracy itself, or pulled not even half the **** Trump and his crony co-conspirators have pulled, Republicans would've locked them ALL up... LONG ago.

Yet, in spite of crimes committed, known of, and even more being REVEALED as we speak, chicken-**** Merrick Garland sits on his hands doing essentially NOTHING.

And I've become convinced he'll DO nothing.

Fkng PATHETIC:

"The weakness is off the charts": Ex-prosecutors sound alarm on team Garland assigned to Trump case - Salon

Time for the DOJ to stop playing Trump's reindeer games; and indict him: former federal prosecutor - Raw Story

Merrick Garland urged to act after Trump's defiant response to congressional subpoena - Raw

Mary Trump warned of ‘much worse things’ to happen if Trump indictment decision wasn't made before 2024 announcement - The Independent

Former Trump attorney: Ignore partisan games and indict Trump - Raw Story

Legal experts say DOJ will lose credibility if it doesn't indict Trump: You have to bring a case - Raw Story

DOJ case against Trump “gets stronger and stronger” after latest filing - Salon

A three hour unarmed riot was not a threat to American democracy. It simply wasn't. Blm riots were far more violent, there were 587 of them, federal buildings were occupied and under siege for weeks. I don't think they were a threat to American democracy, certainly Jan 6th wasn't either.
 

LIKE I SAID, ****:

‘Is He Insane?’ Elie Mystal Slams Merrick Garland’s ‘Self-Serving’ Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Trump - Mediaite

This Time DA Alvin Bragg Is REALLY, REALLY, REALLY Going To Charge Donald Trump With Crimes. Or At Least He's Going To THINK Hard About It. Yah! You Bet! - Above the Law

Michael Cohen: There was plenty of evidence for DA Bragg to go after Trump long ago - Raw Story

Lawyers React to Report That Manhattan DA Sees Stormy Daniels Hush Money Payment as a Way to Criminally Charge Trump

Making their own job difficult: CNN analyst rips prosecutors for dragging their feet on Trump probes - Raw Story
 

CLUCK CLUCK, CLUCK CLUCK:

How Garland may have dug a hole for himself: Merrick Garland should have indicted Donald Trump as soon as he had the chance, according to one legal expert - MSN

Watch: Former Justice Department lawyer thinks DOJ was way too slow in going after Trump - Raw Story

Speed matters: Elie Honig fears Merrick Garland is letting Trump wriggle away from slow probes - Raw Story
 

B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am

Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6.  Here are some of the headlines I've collected:

Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org

"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists

Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters

Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'

Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?

Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump

LOL "none too happy" - - who  are you, a half-witted imitator of Mary Sheley?
 

B.See » 30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2021, 4:27 am

Needless to say, some are none too happy with what they've characterized as an unwillingness on the part of A.G. Garland's DOJ to pursue accountability from Trump and his closest co-conspirators for Jan. 6.  Here are some of the headlines I've collected:

Legal group calls on AG Garland to resign — citing failure to prosecute Trump and his cronies - Alternet.org

"Almost Schizophrenic" - Judge blasts DOJ for lenient prosecution of 1/6 insurrectionists

Overnight News Digest: Garland and Wray show no desire to hold accountable January 6 coup plotters

Top Jan. 6 federal judge slams DOJ for treating 'crime of the century' as some 'petty offense'

Where is the Justice Dept and Merrick Garland on these prosecutions of clear contempt?

Claire McCaskill Tells The DOJ To Get Moving And Prosecute Trump

I thought we had a right to a speedy trial?  2 years later snd they are still in jail with no trial wtf?
 

PROFILES IN ****:

Stunning: Reporters who uncovered Matt Gaetz evidence baffled after DOJ dropped sex trafficking case - Salon

DOJ collected evidence of conspiracy involving Nick Fuentes and Baked Alaska, but never charged them - Dailykos

The DOJ Must Not Look Away from LYNCHING of Rasheed Carter - Eurweb (dot com)


MEANWHILE, MAGA'S COMPLICIT SEDITIONISTS:

Fox News host rips House GOP for doing Trump's bidding with move to intimidate Alvin Bragg - Raw Story

Unlawful: DA Alvin Bragg goes off on Jim Jordan and GOP investigators for taking Trump's bait - Salon

McCarthy orders congressional probe of local district attorney investigating Trump - MSN

Hypocritical Republicans shredded by legal scholar for trying to intimidate Manhattan prosecutor - Raw Story

Prosecutor fired by Ron DeSantis hits GOP attacks on the Manhattan DA: Part of the authoritarian playbook - NBC News

Andrew Warren, the former state attorney in Hillsborough County, has seen these attacks before.