This is the conclusion reached by that studyfreeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ I thought this deserved its own thread for young women to note, and particularly defenders of Big Pharma and the government agencies they "own", through regulatory capture.
Excerpts:
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study ... id-vaccine
"Study Shows That Up To 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester"
"One particular finding – that related to miscarriages – has been seemingly overlooked (and perhaps even intentionally hidden, as some claim, since corrections were made to the report). But first, it’s important to keep in mind that miscarriages are defined as “the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before the 20th week.” The general rate of miscarriages in the U.S. ranges from as low as 10% to as high as 26%, depending on the medical publication."
"However, this study is focusing specifically on how the Covid vaccine impacts pregnancy, including by trimester. So to more precisely calculate the miscarriage rate, we have to remember that miscarriages, by definition, occur before the 20-week gestation mark. This means that all 700 women who received the vaccine in the third trimester must be excluded from the calculation because they were already past being able to have a technical miscarriage. So really, 104 out of 127 women experienced a miscarriage. This means the miscarriage rate of women who received the vaccine in the first or second trimester is actually 81.9%, or 8 out of 10 women – way, way above the national average."
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ "Other researchers have analyzed the data from this study and have also calculated similar miscarriage rates. New Zealand researcher Dr. Aleisha Brock and Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, calculated the incidence of miscarriage in women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation was actually 82-91% in a paper published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law in November 2021. “We question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand,” the researchers said."
You are reading this in as brain-dead and myopic a fashion as you did the FDA warning regarding vaccine-enhanced disease.Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ This is the conclusion reached by that study
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.
That being said, the study seems to overlook the miscarriage rate and to focus on the positive rates of third-trimester vaccination, concluding that “Early data...do not indicate any obvious safety signals with respect to pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with Covid-19 vaccination in the third trimester of pregnancy.”
No. You are making **** up. I quoted the official conclusion of the studyfreeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ You are reading this in as brain-dead of a fashion as you did the FDA warning regarding vaccine-enhanced disease.
viewtopic.php?p=1870076#p1870076
Follow the math. Go to the link and read the whole paper. It doesn't take long. The study overlooked exactly what the OP and other scientists gleaned from it.
freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ I thought this deserved its own thread for young women to note, and particularly defenders of Big Pharma and the government agencies they "own", through regulatory capture.
Excerpts:
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study ... id-vaccine
This is crap.freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ I thought this deserved its own thread for young women to note, and particularly defenders of Big Pharma and the government agencies they "own", through regulatory capture.
Excerpts:
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study ... id-vaccine
"Study Shows That Up To 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester"
"One particular finding – that related to miscarriages – has been seemingly overlooked (and perhaps even intentionally hidden, as some claim, since corrections were made to the report). But first, it’s important to keep in mind that miscarriages are defined as “the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before the 20th week.” The general rate of miscarriages in the U.S. ranges from as low as 10% to as high as 26%, depending on the medical publication."
"However, this study is focusing specifically on how the Covid vaccine impacts pregnancy, including by trimester. So to more precisely calculate the miscarriage rate, we have to remember that miscarriages, by definition, occur before the 20-week gestation mark. This means that all 700 women who received the vaccine in the third trimester must be excluded from the calculation because they were already past being able to have a technical miscarriage. So really, 104 out of 127 women experienced a miscarriage. This means the miscarriage rate of women who received the vaccine in the first or second trimester is actually 81.9%, or 8 out of 10 women – way, way above the national average."
In 8 out of 10 pregnancies?Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ Okay, for the sake of argument, let's say that the fetus was lost in order to save the woman, the "mother".
Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ The question here is, why would it be a problem even if it was 10 out of 10, 100%?
Who is more valuable, the fetus or the woman who can make many of them?
freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ "Other researchers have analyzed the data from this study and have also calculated similar miscarriage rates. New Zealand researcher Dr. Aleisha Brock and Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, calculated the incidence of miscarriage in women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation was actually 82-91% in a paper published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law in November 2021. “We question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand,” the researchers said."
Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑August 11, 2021
."It's true that in January 2021, health authorities warned that because of the lack of testing in pregnant populations, the use of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women was not recommended unless they were at risk of high exposure, such as healthcare workers. However, in August, due in part to new data on the safety of the vaccines and in part to a surge in infections caused by the delta variant, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged all pregnant women to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Although the data is still incomplete, according to the CDC it suggests that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine outweigh any known or potential risks of vaccination during pregnancy."
Because you are on a thread that is posting fake news about the shot and you are not challenging it
Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Because you are on a thread that is posting fake news about the shot and you are not challenging it
Tell it to the leftFJB » 01 Dec 2021, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Everyone is entitled to his or hers opinion. That is the big problem with the left, you can't handle someone's opinion.