Liberal Forum

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:23 am

Do those that got the jab to mitigate a 3 in 10,000 risk of dying for those under 70 years old - including fat diabetics with cancer and heart disease - even realize that they volunteered to be phase 3 test subjects (guinea pigs) in vaccine "trials", of which the Moderna  won't be concluded until October 27, 2022 and Pfizer not until January 31, 2023?
What else weren't they told?

Pfizer vaccine is fully approved 

FOS » 01 Dec 2021, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:59 am

explain to me what a conspiracy theory is?
 

That's how democrats describe truth.
 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:23 am

Do those that got the jab to mitigate a 3 in 10,000 risk of dying for those under 70 years old - including fat diabetics with cancer and heart disease - even realize that they volunteered to be phase 3 test subjects (guinea pigs) in vaccine "trials", of which the Moderna  won't be concluded until October 27, 2022 and Pfizer not until January 31, 2023?
What else weren't they told?

Many account of lies and sloppy Pfizer testing.  

Why ask to GUBT to protect you from law suits for 100 years??


hahaha

Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:31 am

Many account of lies and sloppy Pfizer testing.  

Why ask to GUBT to protect you from law suits for 100 years??

hahaha

Jibber jabber 

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:21 am

Flabber jabber....

Great Biden impression..!!

duhh, flibby, cmon man, guuurrrr
 

Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:32 am

Great Biden impression..!!

duhh, flibby, cmon man, guuurrrr

Scooby doooooooo
 

Pfizer..."we have to start jabbing people and then we can know all the adverse reactions"

uhhhhh, hmm.

Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:34 am

Pfizer..."we have to start jabbing people and then we can know all the adverse reactions"

uhhhhh, hmm.

Its fully approved idiot.  Lol

End of Empire

is a very scary thing for Old Sleepy

Trump is a poopyhead

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:35 am

Its fully approved idiot.  Lol

Nahhh, rushed and bullied into implementation for OLD SLEEPY.

America is a wreck.  Trails ongoing through 2024 you cucky mccuck
 

A 2021 paper which Thornley co-authored which linked mRNA vaccines, such as the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, to significantly higher rates of miscarriage was publicly criticized by the academic community throughout New Zealand, including the Head and other senior members of the university’s School of Population Health, for ignoring evidence that had already been published in a high-impact peer-reviewed research journal, and for a less-than-rigorous analysis of the data provided by the Center for Disease Control in the USA.  The paper, which was published in a small journal edited by an American anti-vaccination advocate, was retracted in November 2021, with Thornley saying that he and his co-author had made a major mathematical error.

Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:37 am

Nahhh, rushed and bullied into implementation for OLD SLEEPY.

America is a wreck.  Trails ongoing through 2024 you cucky mccuck

Fake news!!!!!!!!!

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:50 am

Do you believe that every ob/gyn in America is seeing an 80% miscarriage rate among their vaxxed patients and just turning up the CNN?

I know that because of mass psychosis vaccine adverse events are ignored and massively under reported in large part because they don't fit the narrative as well as because few people will spend the half hour to suffer the intimidation of filing one.
VAERS - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System - less than 1% are reported

The ob/gyn office my daughter goes to has a big sign on the wall telling pregnant women to get vaxxed, even though pregnant women were specifically excluded from the vaccine trials. But are they going to turn around and go against the narrative, no matter what they observe, particularly if they work for a group that collectively conform to the "standard of care"? No. They don't want to loose their Ferraris to lawsuits. So the carnage will continue.
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals
 

Biden shamble ridden Afghan pullout

is foreshadowing of Bidens wreckage of America

Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:27 am

Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:40 am

Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:32 am

August 11, 2021
."It's true that in January 2021, health authorities warned that because of the lack of testing in pregnant populations, the use of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women was not recommended unless they were at risk of high exposure, such as healthcare workers. However, in August, due in part to new data on the safety of the vaccines and in part to a surge in infections caused by the delta variant, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged all pregnant women to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Although the data is still incomplete, according to the CDC it suggests that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine outweigh any known or potential risks of vaccination during pregnancy."

..

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am

 

 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:45 am

I know that because of mass psychosis vaccine adverse events are ignored and massively under reported in large part because they don't fit the narrative as well as because few people will spend the half hour to suffer the intimidation of filing one.
VAERS - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System - less than 1% are reported

The ob/gyn office my daughter goes to has a big sign on the wall telling pregnant women to get vaxxed, even though pregnant women were specifically excluded from the vaccine trials. But are they going to turn around and go against the narrative, no matter what they observe, particularly if they work for a group that collectively conform to the "standard of care"? No. They don't want to loose their Ferraris to lawsuits. So the carnage will continue.
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals

Dude you posted fake news


Dismissed 

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:27 am

Pfizer vaccine is fully approved

So what should it communicate to you if the FDA approved the Pfizer non-vaxx a year before the vaccine trials were even scheduled to conclude?
Particularly in light of its performance against the first variant to offer it a challenge.
Pfizer-BioNTech effectiveness down to 42% Moderna down to 76%
 

Covid-19: A paper on vaccination in pregnancy co-authored by Simon Thornley has been panned by experts around the world

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health ... -the-world

Thornley and Brock said papers published since the original CDC paper were “immaterial” to their analysis. They did not respond when asked to justify their recommendation to withdraw vaccines to large numbers of people without reference to other data.

It was published seven weeks before Thornley and Brock’s paper, but is not referenced.

"We have 11 studies, from 5 countries, done on more than 75,000 people vaccinated in pregnancy, and published either by reputable peer-reviewed journals or directly by health authorities, all of which find no link between Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy and miscarriage or any other pregnancy complication,” said Dr Victoria Male, an immunologist who studies vaccines and pregnancy at Imperial College London
 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 11:53 am

So what should it communicate to you if the FDA approved the Pfizer non-vaxx a year before the vaccine trials were even scheduled to conclude?

That they already had sufficient evidence that it was safe and effective 


What does it communicate to you that you got caught posting fake news?