Liberal Forum

Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:27 am

Okay, for the sake of argument, let's say that the fetus was lost in order to save the woman, the "mother".

Do you have a problem with that as I don't, she can have other babies after the pandemic.

Side note, I am only here (it would not have been my choice) because the fetus before me didn't make it.  Real life works like that...

Regardless of your opinion, if it does terminate 8 in 10 early term pregnancies, shouldn't the expectant mother be given the information so they can make an informed choice? I would have to see a larger sample size before demanding pregnant women be warned of the danger.
 
 

Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:49 am

It's not a "feeling", it's reality.

Trade Adolf Hitler for Jonas Salk?  No problem.  One has value, one doesn't.

There are likely billions of people that I would trade you for, and it would make the world a better place.

Don't Post Dogma...

Free country little one. 

Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:06 am

Only in a manner of speaking, *******...

1st Amendment 

FJB » 01 Dec 2021, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:46 am

Everyone is entitled to his or hers opinion. That is the big problem with the left, you can't handle someone's opinion.

Tell Liz Cheney...


**** idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:11 am

Tell Liz Cheney...

**** idiot.

LOL, she made a decision... she has to deal with that.

FJB » 01 Dec 2021, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:16 am

LOL, she made a decision... she has to deal with that.

That "decision" being?

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:19 am

That "decision" being?

are you really that slow?
She has to deal with the way she voted on impeachment.

FJB » 01 Dec 2021, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:20 am

are you really that slow?
She has to deal with the way she voted on impeachment.

You really are that vague...

Try again.

 

Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:12 am

Certainly.  

But there is no rational choice between the fetus and the woman.

Demanding all choices of a citizen be rational is a pretty un-American notion. We have the freedom of irrationality. 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:22 am

You really are that vague...

Try again.

you are really helpless. 

FJB » 01 Dec 2021, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:24 am

you are really helpless.

No...You're a coward.

It's the Indelible Stain of your Death Cult.
 

Neo » 01 Dec 2021, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:24 am

Demanding all choices of a citizen be rational is a pretty un-American notion. We have the freedom of irrationality.

Certainly....but keep it to yourselves.

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:25 am

No...You're a coward.

It's the Indelible Stain of your Death Cult.

I gave you the answer, you couldn't accept it. 

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:22 am

No.  You are making **** up.  I quoted the official conclusion of the study

You are wrong

What happens when you consider the data from first and second trimesters, separately from the third?
 
 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:27 am

What happens when you consider the first and second trimesters, separately from the third, as the author of this paper and the corroborating study did?

You come to the same conclusion as the original study did.

If they want to refute the conclusions let them form their own study

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:24 am

This is crap.

Please explain the basis from which you drew your conclusion.

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:29 am

Please explain the basis from which you drew your conclusion.

By reading the actual conclusions of the study
 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:29 am

Please explain the basis from which you drew your conclusion.

Consider the venue.


Read its "about" statement.

It's ****.
 

Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:24 am

Gee.....another mag for bimbos.
Yeah....that's what we need.

Attacking the messenger is the fallback of weak-minded people that are unable to refute truth.

Pengwin » 01 Dec 2021, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:33 am

The question here is, why would it be a problem even if it was 10 out of 10, 100%?

Who is more valuable, the fetus or the woman who can make many of them?

That is the coldest and most reprobate thing I have read in this forum.
Though I would agree that if the fetus was jammed full of spike proteins from the jab - as women's ovaries are - it could be better off lost than born.