Liberal Forum

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:29 am

You come to the same conclusion as the original study did.

If they want to refute the conclusions let them form their own study

What an irrelevant reply. You only come to that conclusion if you don't separate out the trimesters.
There's no need to do another study when an honest look at the study in question shows that 8 out of 10 fetuses are killed when the mother is vaxxed in the 1st and 2nd trimester.
Yet you post as though 8 out of 10 1st and 2nd trimester babies being killed is perfectly reasonable to you. Like every expectant mom should find that an acceptable risk.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:10 am

Taking another Epoch Times plug, BucketMouth?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Believed Putin ran Wash DC for 4 years...

CUUCCCCKKKKOOO the CUCKY!!   Ate Richard Maddows man *** for 4 years

         
 

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 9:30 am

By reading the actual conclusions of the study

But those conclusions can only be made by combining 3rd trimester (well established larger babies), with 1st and 2nd trimester babies.
But when we separate out the data for 1st and 2nd trimester babies, we find that 8 out of 10 of them are miscarried.
 

Herpes » 01 Dec 2021, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:21 am

THE VACCINE EATS THE OVARIES

Certainly can't help them: Japanese study – vax spike protein in spleen, liver, adrenals, ovaries
Which highlights another Big Pharma lie, that the spike proteins would remain around the injection site and nearby lymph nodes.
 
 

Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:23 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Believed Putin ran Wash DC for 4 years...

CUUCCCCKKKKOOO the CUCKY!!   Ate Richard Maddows man *** for 4 years

       

I guess we can consider your narrative as we behold the unambiguous evidence of your eager credulity.

Herpes » 01 Dec 2021, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:21 am

You are arguing with the member voted the lowest IQ

But since it is unimaginable that anyone can be as stupid as some of those commenting in this thread - that is, as dumb as a box of rocks - it wouldn't surprise me if Big Pharma devotes a few million of the hundreds of billions of dollars they make, to hire kids to sit in their mom's basements and go online to tell stupid lies and post irrational nonsense in forums while avoiding actually honestly addressing the content.
 
 
 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:23 am

But those conclusions can only be made by combining 3rd trimester (well established larger babies), with 1st and 2nd trimester babies.
But when we separate out the data for 1st and 2nd trimester babies, we find that 8 out of 10 of them are miscarried.

No...it's tautological..

 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:23 am

But those conclusions can only be made by combining 3rd trimester (well established larger babies), with 1st and 2nd trimester babies.
But when we separate out the data for 1st and 2nd trimester babies, we find that 8 out of 10 of them are miscarried.

The authors do not agree with your conclusions

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:34 am

But since it is unimaginable that anyone can be as stupid as some of those commenting in this thread - that is, as dumb as a box of rocks - it wouldn't surprise me if Big Pharma devotes a few million of the hundreds of billions of dollars they make, to hire kids to sit in their mom's basements and tell stupid lies and post irrational nonsense in forums without ever actually honestly addressing the content.

Big Pharma

Because if a deadly virus was to be addressed, it would be by a group of hardy ingenious backwoods types working with moss and a still.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:33 am

I guess we can consider your narrative as we behold the unambiguous evidence of your eager credulity.

yer real gay, huh?
 

Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:39 am

yer real gay, huh?

You ain't all that bright, are you.

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:34 am

No...it's tautological..

But separating is far from being repetitive, but rather bringing clarity specifically to the subject of miscarriages, which are only considered as such through the 2nd trimester.

 

Vegasgiants » 01 Dec 2021, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:36 am

The authors do not agree with your conclusions

That's because the study authors did not address miscarriages separately from 3rd trimester babies.
 

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:45 am

That's because the study authors did not address miscarriages separately from 3rd trimester babies.

Then you have no study that agrees with you

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:42 am

But separating is far from being repetitive, but rather bringing clarity specifically to the subject of miscarriages, which are only considered as such through the 2nd trimester.

Again.

The argument is circular, and defies reason 

Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:41 am

You ain't all that bright, are you

 

Lol @ all the 'liberals' here determined to deny reality

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:45 am

That's because the study authors did not address miscarriages separately from 3rd trimester babies.

Do you believe that every ob/gyn in America is seeing an 80% miscarriage rate among their vaxxed patients and just turning up the CNN?

FOS » 01 Dec 2021, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 10:50 am

Lol @ all the 'liberals' here determined to deny reality

CCErasmus in the Hizzy!

freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2021, 8:07 am

I thought this deserved its own thread for young women to note, and particularly defenders of Big Pharma and the government agencies they "own", through regulatory capture.
Excerpts:
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study ... id-vaccine

"Study Shows That Up To 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester"

This is a Qanon conspiracy website

Behind the Scenes of an “Unbiased” Women’s Magazine

Dangerous conspiracy theories, disinformation, and aggressive political bias
​​​​
https://medium.com/bigger-picture/behin ... aa7c6b3af5

Through its aggressive marketing as an "unbiased source of truth," Evie Magazine tricks people into thinking that it is a factual news site. A quick glance at the magazine’s homepage and a quick read through some of the articles (written at a middle school reading level) show that the authors are clearly pandering to right-wing talking points. From articles spreading disinformation about election fraud to articles cozying up to the Qanon conspiracy theory, Evie Magazine intentionally spreads disinformation to its young, easily impressionable audience. The “health” section has several articles casting doubt on birth control, Covid lockdowns, and mask wearing. 

Claim: QAnon is an innocent movement to “save the children!”

Through my investigation of Evie, one article stood out to me: an article that sympathized with QAnon. The author of the article claims that QAnon, a conspiracy theory that claims Democratic politicians and Hollywood stars are running an undercover sex-trafficking ring and that President Trump will save us all from them, has basis in reality. To her, QAnon is factually accurate because she believes that its sole purpose is to raise awareness for sex-trafficking. She then proceeds to argue that social media bans of pro-QAnon content are unfair since it goes against the doctrine of free speech.