Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Study Shows 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester
Study Shows 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester
By freeman
1 Dec 2021 7:07 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 Dec 2021 9:53 am
And there's an excellent example of COVID Derangement Syndrome.Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Because if a deadly virus was to be addressed, it would be by a group of hardy ingenious backwoods types working with moss and a still.
COVID Derangement Syndrome - an irrational and deadly fear of information
Being propagandized into being terrified of a virus that is so "deadly" it kills about 3 in 10,000 that are under 70 years old, including fat diabetics with cancer and heart disease.
Vaccine "hesitant" (pragmatic) VS vaccine blind obedient
And those 3 in 10,000 were too lazy or stupid to prepare their systems and medicine cabinets in advance of infection, with 99+% effective $20 early treatment protocols. Which render even the elderly and high risk individual's odds of dying essentially zero.
https://youtu.be/5vLuEook3VM
1 Dec 2021 9:56 am
I know its crazy!!
These jabs forced on us with so few STUDIES done on the adverse reactions.
Quickly thrown together vaccines - what could go wrong? Not enough STUDIES done
I agree with you its insanity.
1 Dec 2021 9:59 am
I know. It was a massive amount of studiesOmicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ I know its crazy!!
These jabs forced on us with so few STUDIES done on the adverse reactions.
Quickly thrown together vaccines - what could go wrong? Not enough STUDIES done
I agree with you its insanity.
I agree
1 Dec 2021 9:59 am
OdeToJoy » 01 Dec 2021, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ This is a Qanon conspiracy website
Behind the Scenes of an “Unbiased” Women’s Magazine
Dangerous conspiracy theories, disinformation, and aggressive political bias
https://medium.com/bigger-picture/behin ... aa7c6b3af5
Through its aggressive marketing as an "unbiased source of truth," Evie Magazine tricks people into thinking that it is a factual news site. A quick glance at the magazine’s homepage and a quick read through some of the articles (written at a middle school reading level) show that the authors are clearly pandering to right-wing talking points. From articles spreading disinformation about election fraud to articles cozying up to the Qanon conspiracy theory, Evie Magazine intentionally spreads disinformation to its young, easily impressionable audience. The “health” section has several articles casting doubt on birth control, Covid lockdowns, and mask wearing.
Claim: QAnon is an innocent movement to “save the children!”
Through my investigation of Evie, one article stood out to me: an article that sympathized with QAnon. The author of the article claims that QAnon, a conspiracy theory that claims Democratic politicians and Hollywood stars are running an undercover sex-trafficking ring and that President Trump will save us all from them, has basis in reality. To her, QAnon is factually accurate because she believes that its sole purpose is to raise awareness for sex-trafficking. She then proceeds to argue that social media bans of pro-QAnon content are unfair since it goes against the doctrine of free speech.
"a conspiracy theory that claims Democratic politicians and Hollywood stars are running an undercover sex-trafficking ring"
https://apnews.com/article/ghislaine-ma ... 7bc413bfe0
explain to me what a conspiracy theory is? something that is simply true?
SO ok...GOP were also implicated and of course Israel. And trump isnt saving us. But everything else about this 'conspiracy theory' has been proven true...so what exactly about it should discredit a site?
1 Dec 2021 10:03 am
That study is specifically where the data analysis in the OP comes from.
You cannot refute the conclusion that 8 out of 10 1st and 2nd trimester pregnancies end in miscarriage, according to the data in the study.
1 Dec 2021 10:04 am
uh huh, 1 year.....
Vegas the cuck cuck cuckaaarrrooooooooooooooooo!
1 Dec 2021 10:06 am
You're dumber than ****.freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ And there's an excellent example of COVID Derangement Syndrome.
COVID Derangement Syndrome - an irrational and deadly fear of information
Being propagandized into being terrified of a virus that is so "deadly" it kills about 3 in 10,000 that are under 70 years old, including fat diabetics with cancer and heart disease.
Vaccine "hesitant" (pragmatic) VS vaccine blind obedient
And those 3 in 10,000 were too lazy or stupid to prepare their systems and medicine cabinets in advance of infection, with 99+% effective $20 early treatment protocols. Which render even the elderly and high risk individual's odds of dying essentially zero.
https://youtu.be/5vLuEook3VM
1 Dec 2021 10:06 am
Withdrawn.freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ That study is specifically where the data analysis in the OP comes from.
You cannot refute the conclusion that 8 out of 10 1st and 2nd trimester pregnancies end in miscarriage, according to the data in the study.
Do you understand what that means?
1 Dec 2021 10:08 am
Flippitty bippittyOmicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ uh huh, 1 year.....
Vegas the cuck cuck cuckaaarrrooooooooooooooooo!
1 Dec 2021 10:14 am
Not at all. Separating 1st and 2nd trimester from the 3rd trimester, to determine the rate of miscarriage, is far more reasonable than lumping them all together to arrive at a Big Pharma friendly and fetus deadly outcome.Blackvegetable » 01 Dec 2021, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Again.
The argument is circular, and defies reason
The FACTS are the FACTS which you haven't refuted yet.
8 out of 10 fetuses whose moms were jabbed during the 1st and 2nd trimester, ended in miscarriage.
According to that study and even worse by "New Zealand researcher Dr. Aleisha Brock and Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, calculated the incidence of miscarriage in women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation was actually 82-91%."
1 Dec 2021 10:17 am
The fact is you have no study that agrees with your positionfreeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Not at all. Separating 1st and 2nd trimester from the 3rd trimester, to determine the rate of miscarriage, is far more reasonable than lumping them all together to arrive at a Big Pharma friendly and fetus deadly outcome.
The FACTS are the FACTS which you haven't refuted yet.
8 out of 10 fetuses whose moms were jabbed during the 1st and 2nd trimester, ended in miscarriage.
According to that study and even worse by "New Zealand researcher Dr. Aleisha Brock and Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, calculated the incidence of miscarriage in women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation was actually 82-91%."
Its fake news
1 Dec 2021 10:17 am
ewww, is that when your boyfriend FLIPS you over ....and BIPPS your *** ***?
you weird libs. Did Rosenbaum and his little boys join you - you sick ****?
1 Dec 2021 10:17 am
Attacking the messenger is the fallback of weak-minded people that are unable to refute message.OdeToJoy » 01 Dec 2021, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ This is a Qanon conspiracy website
Behind the Scenes of an “Unbiased” Women’s Magazine
Dangerous conspiracy theories, disinformation, and aggressive political bias
https://medium.com/bigger-picture/behin ... aa7c6b3af5
Through its aggressive marketing as an "unbiased source of truth," Evie Magazine tricks people into thinking that it is a factual news site. A quick glance at the magazine’s homepage and a quick read through some of the articles (written at a middle school reading level) show that the authors are clearly pandering to right-wing talking points. From articles spreading disinformation about election fraud to articles cozying up to the Qanon conspiracy theory, Evie Magazine intentionally spreads disinformation to its young, easily impressionable audience. The “health” section has several articles casting doubt on birth control, Covid lockdowns, and mask wearing.
Claim: QAnon is an innocent movement to “save the children!”
Through my investigation of Evie, one article stood out to me: an article that sympathized with QAnon. The author of the article claims that QAnon, a conspiracy theory that claims Democratic politicians and Hollywood stars are running an undercover sex-trafficking ring and that President Trump will save us all from them, has basis in reality. To her, QAnon is factually accurate because she believes that its sole purpose is to raise awareness for sex-trafficking. She then proceeds to argue that social media bans of pro-QAnon content are unfair since it goes against the doctrine of free speech.
1 Dec 2021 10:20 am
Based on the CDC data, it recalculated a miscarriage rate for those who were vaccinated in their first and second trimesters: A shockingly high range of 82 per cent to 91 per cent.
Doing such a calculation, however, is mathematically meaningless. The only way for someone in their first – or early in their second – trimester to complete a pregnancy in three months is to have a miscarriage.
Thornley and Brock told Stuff they calculated and included that figure to highlight what they believed was an error in the original study – that it was wrong to make any miscarriage rate calculation based only on those who had completed their pregnancies in three months
Their figure was nevertheless plucked from the paper and shared widely as fact among anti-vaccination groups and associated media outlets.
It was even emphasised in the headline of the journal’s press release about the paper. The text of the release claims the paper “estimated that unexpected termination of pregnancies actually occurred at a rate 7-8 times higher in vaccinated pregnant women” than the baseline rate.
This conflicts with Thornley and Brock’s own explanation that the data could not be used to calculate any rate at all.
In remarks quoted in The Epoch Times, Thornley himself said his reanalysis showed vaccination early in pregnancy “indicates a substantially increased risk from background”, without noting that such a calculation is, by his own reasoning, useless.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/health/c ... rnley-says
Doing such a calculation, however, is mathematically meaningless. The only way for someone in their first – or early in their second – trimester to complete a pregnancy in three months is to have a miscarriage.
Thornley and Brock told Stuff they calculated and included that figure to highlight what they believed was an error in the original study – that it was wrong to make any miscarriage rate calculation based only on those who had completed their pregnancies in three months
Their figure was nevertheless plucked from the paper and shared widely as fact among anti-vaccination groups and associated media outlets.
It was even emphasised in the headline of the journal’s press release about the paper. The text of the release claims the paper “estimated that unexpected termination of pregnancies actually occurred at a rate 7-8 times higher in vaccinated pregnant women” than the baseline rate.
This conflicts with Thornley and Brock’s own explanation that the data could not be used to calculate any rate at all.
In remarks quoted in The Epoch Times, Thornley himself said his reanalysis showed vaccination early in pregnancy “indicates a substantially increased risk from background”, without noting that such a calculation is, by his own reasoning, useless.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/health/c ... rnley-says
1 Dec 2021 10:21 am
Flabber jabberOmicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ ewww, is that when your boyfriend FLIPS you over ....and BIPPS your *** ***?
you weird libs. Did Rosenbaum and his little boys join you - you sick ****?
1 Dec 2021 10:21 am
Falling for scams is a pathology of slack jawed morons.freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Attacking the messenger is the fallback of weak-minded people that are unable to refute message.
1 Dec 2021 10:21 am
freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Attacking the messenger is the fallback of weak-minded people that are unable to refute message.
Yes, and you are attacking the messenger. Which means that you are a weak minded person that is unable to refute message.
1 Dec 2021 10:22 am
Yes....very much so.freeman » 01 Dec 2021, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Not at all. Separating 1st and 2nd trimester from the 3rd trimester, to determine the rate of miscarriage, is far more reasonable than lumping them all together to arrive at a Big Pharma friendly and fetus deadly outcome.
The FACTS are the FACTS which you haven't refuted yet.
8 out of 10 fetuses whose moms were jabbed during the 1st and 2nd trimester, ended in miscarriage.
According to that study and even worse by "New Zealand researcher Dr. Aleisha Brock and Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, calculated the incidence of miscarriage in women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation was actually 82-91%."
1 Dec 2021 10:23 am
Do those that got the jab to mitigate a 3 in 10,000 risk of dying for those under 70 years old - including fat diabetics with cancer and heart disease - even realize that they volunteered to be phase 3 test subjects (guinea pigs) in vaccine "trials", of which the Moderna won't be concluded until October 27, 2022 and Pfizer not until January 31, 2023?Omicron420 » 01 Dec 2021, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ I know its crazy!!
These jabs forced on us with so few STUDIES done on the adverse reactions.
Quickly thrown together vaccines - what could go wrong? Not enough STUDIES done
I agree with you its insanity.
What else weren't they told?
1 Dec 2021 10:27 am
Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑..Phoenix68.2.0 » 01 Dec 2021, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑August 11, 2021
."It's true that in January 2021, health authorities warned that because of the lack of testing in pregnant populations, the use of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women was not recommended unless they were at risk of high exposure, such as healthcare workers. However, in August, due in part to new data on the safety of the vaccines and in part to a surge in infections caused by the delta variant, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged all pregnant women to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Although the data is still incomplete, according to the CDC it suggests that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine outweigh any known or potential risks of vaccination during pregnancy."
Who is online
In total there are 7336 users online :: 11 registered, 13 bots, and 7312 guests
Registered users: Zeets2, Buck Naked, ROG62, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Adsbot, MicroMessenger, Bolt, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, Googlebot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, proximic, CriteoBot, curl/7, bingbot