Liberal Forum

lmfa
 FOS
Funny...bv is half Jewish and thinks there are half as many genders as the jews think

LMAO

Huey » 08 Dec 2021, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 7:47 am

It appears that one liner is your new diversionary talking point.

dwarf,

you're an idiot.


answer the question.
 

rippy3838 » 08 Dec 2021, 5:11 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:11 am

Thank you for your opinion.

better informed than yours..

Jinn Martini » 07 Dec 2021, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2021, 9:10 pm

Plenty  . . .  and they all have more money than I have.

They're also younger (not much) and full of dreams for their future.

Future  . . .  something they think they have  . . .  

Something I know I don't have !

RAOTFFLMFAO
 

wow! you really given away all you ever were before you became a who speculating life beyond limited to mutually evolving here. that is on you and every other character promoting social narratives life is but a dream state of mind regardless their generation adapting in space of timed apart now.

Neo » 08 Dec 2021, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 11:03 am

There are two biological sexes and 57 sexual delusions. 
 

heinz and 57 varieties unable to catch up to understanding biology only reproduced two able to keep the two reappearing forward or not at all. Each replacement is equal to a half life next generation each generated next lifetime added.

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 11:28 am

 Gender systems are used in approximately one quarter of the world's languages.[citation needed] According to one definition: "Genders are classes of nouns reflected in the behaviour of associated words."[2][3][4]


But I was wrong...English recognizes 4.

 

mom and dad, each son or daughter.

Huey » 08 Dec 2021, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 3:15 pm

I can't see you but I know definitively that you are a big ******.

Can you see what is happening here?


 
Describe it.

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm

Huey » 08 Dec 2021, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 3:15 pm

I can't see you but I know definitively that you are a big ******.

Can you see what is happening here?


 
Describe it.

 

There is a thread where that is already discussed.  Have at it!  

Huey » 08 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm

There is a thread where that is already discussed.  Have at it!

This is clearly a Rule of Convenience, Sheilagh 

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm

Can you see what is happening here?


 
Describe it.

President mocking those making fun of him and those making fun of him spend careers teaching people to mind wha tthey believe and never seek more understanding than society gave so far.

Cannonpointer » 08 Dec 2021, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:15 pm

And context being such a difficult thing to grasp, the panty dance takes a new turn...

Spare me, **** simpleton.

Neo » 08 Dec 2021, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:22 pm

Not too hard to express, progressives could overcomplicate a blow job. 

Doubt long since left town, Slack Jaw

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:23 pm

Doubt long since left town, Slack Jaw

Agree, biological sex has long been established. Pointless to try to convince society that various kinks, delusions, and rare medical anomalies amount to a non binary biological sex. Gender expression is driven by culture, sex is binary. 
 
 

Neo » 08 Dec 2021, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:27 pm

Agree, biological sex has long been established. Pointless to try to convince society that various kinks, delusions, and rare medical anomalies amount to a non binary biological sex. Gender expression is driven by culture, sex is binary.

Stop asserting ****, Neo.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/worl ... vanja.html
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:33 pm

Stop asserting ****, Neo.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/worl ... vanja.html

A German court? Lord knows they have always made the right decisions, just ask a Jew over 75.

Neo » 08 Dec 2021, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:36 pm

A German court? Lord knows they have always made the right decisions, just ask a Jew over 75.

You cast 2 votes for worse than Buchanan..

You can sit your dumb *** down now.
 

Vegas » 08 Dec 2021, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:43 pm

You didn't even read your own **** article. It said third category...ok? Yeah, that is real **** precise. 

Moron.

How did the German courts categorize the 3rd option?

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:44 pm

How did the German courts categorize the 3rd option?

Stop **** asking stupid questions. God man. If you can't even hold an intelligent conversation without having to ask stupid questions (asking questions that you know the answer) , then shut the **** up. 

It was vague. Now shut up. 

1. another stupid question
2. no intelligent commentary about his own article

Three possible cases: 

 1.       You are so **** stupid and dense that you genuinely think that there is a connection between knowing that Ovomit was Potus in 2009 implies  not knowing who was Potus in 2008. 

2.       You are a lying sack of ****.

 3.       All of the above.

 Which is it, coward?

Vegas » 08 Dec 2021, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:48 pm

Stop **** asking stupid questions. God man. If you can't even hold an intelligent conversation without having to ask stupid questions (asking questions that you know the answer) , then shut the **** up. 

It was vague. Now shut up. 

1. another stupid question
2. no intelligent commentary about his own article

Go **** yourself. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2021, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2021, 5:49 pm

Go **** yourself.

I wont stop until you choose an option, coward. 

Three possible cases: 

 1.       You are so **** stupid and dense that you genuinely think that there is a connection between knowing that Ovomit was Potus in 2009 implies  not knowing who was Potus in 2008. 

2.       You are a lying sack of ****.

 3.       All of the above.

 Which is it, coward?