Liberal Forum

B.See » 11 Apr 2022, 11:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2022, 11:55 pm

Ginni Thomas demanded Trump's White House hire people who failed background checks: report - Raw Story 

MEANWHILE:

Rep. Jim Clyburn says Hillary Clinton would've won in 2016 if Obama had nominated a Black woman to the Supreme Court

And on this I'd have to agree. My one complaint about Obama is that he was TOO nice to the mfkrs who met in secrecy and conspired to obstruct and undermine him before he even set foot in office.  

For that matter, so is Biden. Call 'em out for what the **** THEY ARE.
 

Oh like that jan. 05, 2017 meeting in the oval office setting up the process of starting impeachment 20 minutes after Trump was inaugurated. Gee, FBI VP speaker of the house. and a host of others. Most all part of the same machine that ushered in Bill Clinton in 1992. Oh those hanging chads that made GWB the invalid president for 8 years until Obama beat Hillary, or did he?

Obama has been other people's pawn since birth thanks to the political ambitions of his mom and dad. "Dreams of my father.".

omh » 12 Apr 2022, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 5:58 am

Oh like that jan. 05, 2017 meeting in the oval office setting up the process of starting impeachment 20 minutes after Trump was inaugurated. Gee, FBI VP speaker of the house. and a host of others. Most all part of the same machine that ushered in Bill Clinton in 1992. Oh those hanging chads that made GWB the invalid president for 8 years until Obama beat Hillary, or did he?

Obama has been other people's pawn since birth thanks to the political ambitions of his mom and dad. "Dreams of my father.".

references??

B.See » 09 Dec 2021, 3:36 am » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2021, 3:36 am

As some may recall, several months ago, certain conservative members of the Supreme Court suddenly became "concerned" about the public's perception of their (quite apparent) right winged partiality, as if the EVIDENCE of the fact might've somehow escaped the attention of anyone half paying attention.   

After all, they only undermined landmark legislation like Affirmative Action and the Voting Rights Act.  "Nothing to see here" eh? 

And the GOP only bitched and moaned when, shortly after later conservative shenanigans on the part of Trump's SCOTUS, a few Democrats WHISPERED about adding more justices to the bench... JUST a whisper, mind you, because Democrats are mostly best at bringing knives to gunfights. 

Never mind that McConnell and company blocked Obama's pick (Merrick Garland), though given Garlands rather milksop approach to prosecuting Trump, prolly just as well, and they fairly CHORTLED at the notion of NEVER affirming a ninth justice if Hillary had won the presidency. 

Because unlike Democrats, they make up ways to do whatever **** they WANT to do... on the fly. 

SO, given the above, it didn't exactly take a rocket scientist to figure out WHY their sudden compulsion to go public about  the public's perception of their obvious political BIAS.  Obviously  SOMETHING was in the wind or down that old proverbial "pike." Nor did it take long for things to become a little CLEARER (for those who hadn't  yet figured it OUT) exactly WHAT:

There is no doubt any more: the US supreme court is run by partisan hacks | Robert Reich | The Guardian

SCOTUS will gaslight us until the end.

GO BACK TO CHINA YOU POS COMMIE BASTARD

B.See » 12 Apr 2022, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 6:02 am

references??

history. was in the news.

omh » 12 Apr 2022, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 6:41 am

history. was in the news.

REFERENCES??
 
 

B.See » 12 Apr 2022, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 6:43 am

REFERENCES??
 
 

Self evident living a sole existence since conceived to replace the last 4 generations of people combined 93.75% anyone's DNA as uniquely present.

biology leaves each great great grandchild 100% the last generation added with parents being compounding interest of 2 parents 50%, 4 grandparents 25%,
8 great grandparents 12.5%, 16 great great grandparents 6.25%.

that is a universal constant. DNA reflects that making each addition to the population never a duplicate of anyone being part of that combined result.

Your one track mantra won't apply rule of 72 compounding interest formula to genetic timing of ever changing population present. My instinctive brain did.

REFERENCES?????????

As Donald Trump tried to hold onto the White House, Clarence THOMas' wife picked up her phone for the 'king of kings' - ABC News

In the chaotic days following the 2020 US election, Donald Trump's chief of staff received a flurry of text messages from one of the [his] most ardent and well-connected supporters. 

"Help this 'resident stand firm!" Ginni Thomas texted Mark Meadows. "You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America's constitutional governance at the precipice."

Like Mr Trump, Mrs Thomas was pushing the White House to make an aggressive and unprecedented effort to overturn Joe Biden's electoral victory.  

"The majority knows Biden and the left [are] attempting the greatest heist of our history," she texted Mr Meadows.  

He replied, according to copies of the messages obtained by The Washington Post and CBS News.

"This is a fight of good versus evil," he texted. "Evil always looks like the victor until the king of kings triumphs."
 

B.See » 19 Apr 2022, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2022, 6:33 am

REFERENCES?????????

As Donald Trump tried to hold onto the White House, Clarence THOMas' wife picked up her phone for the 'king of kings' - ABC News

In the chaotic days following the 2020 US election, Donald Trump's chief of staff received a flurry of text messages from one of the [his] most ardent and well-connected supporters. 

"Help this 'resident stand firm!" Ginni Thomas texted Mark Meadows. "You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America's constitutional governance at the precipice."

Like Mr Trump, Mrs Thomas was pushing the White House to make an aggressive and unprecedented effort to overturn Joe Biden's electoral victory.  

"The majority knows Biden and the left [are] attempting the greatest heist of our history," she texted Mr Meadows.  

He replied, according to copies of the messages obtained by The Washington Post and CBS News.

"This is a fight of good versus evil," he texted. "Evil always looks like the victor until the king of kings triumphs."
 

Social behavior as a community isn't actual evolving as ancestrally positioned. One exists within the other but your mentality has the other being more than what is actually sustaining time being alive here one at a time.

Your whole mentality rides on contingencies of mind over matter, context controls content, symbolism over substance, Royal we is central governance of outcomes arriving tomorrow by statistical logistical timeline scenarios playing off universal constant event horizons shared since conceived by each ancestor of the 5 generations occupying space now.

Your reality has been historically built by suggestions real is beyond intellectual comprehension, yet each fertilize cell evolved into an individual's brain by birth navigates living as eternally separated now.

so which belongs to which?

planned obsolescence and plausible deniability works reverse psychology and inverted logic to the philosophy of thinking outside a box subliminally demands fellowships think beyond their time mutually evolving now.

the corruption to power of suggestion has absolutely corrupted every reality defending humanities.

B.See » 19 Apr 2022, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2022, 6:33 am

REFERENCES?????????

As Donald Trump tried to hold onto the White House, Clarence THOMas' wife picked up her phone for the 'king of kings' - ABC News


"The majority knows Biden and the left [are] attempting the greatest heist of our history," she texted Mr Meadows.  

He replied, according to copies of the messages obtained by The Washington Post and CBS News.

"This is a fight of good versus evil," he texted. "Evil always looks like the victor until the king of kings triumphs."
 

MEANWHILE:

Lawrence O’Donnell slams Clarence Thomas for acting like a ‘politician’ rather than a Supreme Court justice - Alternet.org

Clarence Thomas proves once again that the Supreme Court has to be expanded to be saved

Clarence Thomas is the only Supreme Court justice to take a photo with a political candidate in history: MSNBC host

The Supreme Court’s ‘credibility’ is suffering as John Roberts’ influence collapses: law professor - Alternet.org
 

Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2022, 7:30 am

The Court has lived beyond its usefulness.

Time to drop it back to the very minor, almost nonexistent function, of the Founders.

You do not seem to be aware of the actual history of the Supreme Court.
I agree that the present Court is less than it could be and less than it could be.
But I do  not see any possibility that it will become without influence.
This has never occurred in its past.

Xavier_Onassis » 19 Apr 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2022, 9:13 am

You do not seem to be aware of the actual history of the Supreme Court.
I agree that the present Court is less than it could be and less than it could be.
But I do  not see any possibility that it will become without influence.
This has never occurred in its past.

Here I thought that three branches of government would balance out 2 party political system. The courts were to protect the people living within the Constitution were all human reproductions were created equal.

Living in perpetual balance there is no such thing as fairness of outcomes as each ancestor of ancestry changing population forward shows in real time of biological results living as eternally separated now.

but you demand everyone adopt a social role player of who's who within race, creed, color, national origin, gender, generation, political leaning, spiritual conviction, economic status, leadership or fellowship sustaining franchise reality governing ancestral positions here as history recorded their arrival into mutually evolving space time has always been relatively now every day on any calendar suggesting humans exceed limited to evolving here one at a time in series parallel ancestral positions.

REVEALED: Ginni Thomas texted friend whose boss tried to get Trump election challenges to Supreme Court - Raw Story

New report identifies another strand in Ginni Thomas' web of efforts to overturn the 2020 election

Lawless: Clarence Thomas and his wife's texts expose Supreme Court's missing ethics rules | Salon.com

Clarence Thomas’ attack on equal protection illustrates his chaotic jurisprudence.

LIBERAL ****^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

FJB » 28 Apr 2022, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 7:57 am

LIBERAL ****^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

STILL think it's "liberal ****"??

Supreme Court Leak Shows Justices Preparing To Overturn Roe, Politico Reports

Report: A Leaked Supreme Court Opinion Signals the Justices Are About to Overturn Roe v. Wade – Mother Jones

MEANWHILE:

SCOTUS Rules 6-3 Against Deaf and Blind Woman Seeking Damages for Disability Discrimination; Dissenting Breyer Says Ruling Leaves Victims ‘No Remedy at All’

AND:

House to hold hearing on Ginni Thomas' text messages to Mark Meadows ahead of 1/6 | Salon.com

Ethics of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, other justices questioned at hearing

Who here believes the Supreme Court won't be expanded now?

Squatchman » 03 May 2022, 4:56 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 4:56 am

Who here believes the Supreme Court won't be expanded now?

me. I understand why it is considered to be expanded. Not necessary in real time.

B.See » 03 May 2022, 4:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 4:37 am

STILL think it's "liberal ****"??

Supreme Court Leak Shows Justices Preparing To Overturn Roe, Politico Reports

Report: A Leaked Supreme Court Opinion Signals the Justices Are About to Overturn Roe v. Wade – Mother Jones

MEANWHILE:

SCOTUS Rules 6-3 Against Deaf and Blind Woman Seeking Damages for Disability Discrimination; Dissenting Breyer Says Ruling Leaves Victims ‘No Remedy at All’

AND:

House to hold hearing on Ginni Thomas' text messages to Mark Meadows ahead of 1/6 | Salon.com

Ethics of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, other justices questioned at hearing

**** liberal leaked this

FJB » 03 May 2022, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 9:10 am

**** liberal leaked this

Freedom of speech.
​​​​It's America after all.
Time to expand the court.
 

Squatchman » 03 May 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 9:22 am

Freedom of speech.
​​​​It's America after all.
Time to expand the court.
 

Won't change the corruption established so far. Just make it harder to correct from now on. that you fool is planned obsolescence in action teamed with plausible deniability that comes from facts of life derived from science fiction and spiritual fantasies of a contextual soul is greater than a physical sole reproduction present.

keep it simple psychological class warfare, stupid.

Squatchman » 03 May 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 9:22 am

Freedom of speech.
​​​​It's America after all.
Time to expand the court.

I find it funny that democrats can't grasp the meaning of this "maybe" decision. It is NOT going ban abortion, it is going to leave it up to the States. As far as packing the court... democrats don't have the votes!