Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Conservative Supreme Court
The Conservative Supreme Court
By B.See
9 Dec 2021 2:36 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
21 Jan 2022 8:27 pm
Nobody here is watching that.
21 Jan 2022 8:27 pm
So you can't even explain your own question.Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑ If I now assert that you're a moron, it's my bad, right?
21 Jan 2022 8:30 pm
Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑ What are the odds that Yahoo administrations would nominate SIX CONSECUTIVE anti abortion jurists?
Exactly, BV. The fact is, Republicans under the auspices of the Heritage Foundation and their associates in the Federalist Society have been influencing judgeships for quite some time.According to whom was SCOTUS "liberal" and when?
Not all if us are hip to The Gospel of Slizzy, Slizzy..
They even provide Republicans a list of recommended nominees, those committed to a conservative (and often FAR RIGHT) IDEOLOGY. And like I said, this conservative led SCOTUS has been largely catering to Trump's maladministration and Republicans for some time in their shadow documents, at times deciding in their favor with little or no deliberation.
Opinions | The Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ helped Trump 28 times. Biden is 0 for 1.
Only of late, shortly after news of their actions saw light of day, did justices Barrett, Breyer (a liberal), and Thomas speak of concerns about their public perception, though the last, Thomas (the most biased among them naturally), took a defensive posture in which he attempted to deny that partiality.
Justice Barrett Concerned About Public Perception of Supreme Court | RealClearPolitics
Stephen Breyer worries about Supreme Court's public standing in current political era - CNNPolitics
Clarence Thomas warns against 'destroying our institutions,' defends the Supreme Court | TheHill
21 Jan 2022 8:32 pm
What needs explaining?
Yahoo administrations have nominated six consecutive anti choice Catholics
.
Do you understand how to calculate probabilities?
21 Jan 2022 8:33 pm
Yahoo doesn't nominate.Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ What needs explaining?
Yahoo administrations have nominated six consecutive anti choice Catholics
.
Do you understand how to calculate probabilities?
21 Jan 2022 8:33 pm
They've been "cramming" the court with antiabortion hacks to pander to their dwindling toothless constituency.B.See » 21 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑
Exactly, BV. The fact is, Republicans under the auspices of the Heritage Foundation and their associates in the Federalist Society has been influencing judgeships for quite some time. They even provide Republicans a list of recommended nominees, those committed to a conservative (and often FAR RIGHT) IDEOLOGY. And like I said, this conservative led SCOTUS has been largely catering to Trump's maladministration and Republicans for some time in their shadow documents, at times deciding in their favor with little or no deliberation.
Only of late, shortly after news of their actions saw light of day, did justices Barrett, Breyer (a liberal), and Thomas speak of concerns about their public perception, though the last, Thomas, took a defensive posture in which he attempted to deny that partiality.
Justice Barrett Concerned About Public Perception of Supreme Court | RealClearPolitics
Stephen Breyer worries about Supreme Court's public standing in current political era - CNNPolitics
Clarence Thomas warns against 'destroying our institutions,' defends the Supreme Court | TheHill
21 Jan 2022 8:36 pm
You can't do the math, can you..
21 Jan 2022 8:37 pm
You should..
That is one stupid **** clan
21 Jan 2022 8:37 pm
Yahoo doesn't nominate.
21 Jan 2022 8:38 pm
21 Jan 2022 8:42 pm
Because it is a tribute to Affirmative Action..
Now stop asking questions and start cipherin
21 Jan 2022 8:43 pm
Explain Thomas, and Barrett...
21 Jan 2022 8:45 pm
"Affirmative action" isn't capitalized.Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Because it is a tribute to Affirmative Action..
Now stop asking questions and start cipherin
21 Jan 2022 8:47 pm
Affirmative Action
Primary tabs Definition
A set of procedures designed to eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/affirmative_action
Now I want to see some math, or an admission..
21 Jan 2022 8:48 pm
Like I said--it's not capitalized. Your own source shows that.Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Affirmative Action
Primary tabs Definition
A set of procedures designed to eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/affirmative_action
Now I want to see some math, or an admission..
21 Jan 2022 8:49 pm
Exactly. While their TROLLS (paid and otherwise) flood liberal forums to bury FACTS behind spam, lies, denials, and personal attacks.Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ They've been "cramming" the court with antiabortion hacks to pander to their dwindling toothless constituency.
AGAIN:
Republicans under the auspices of the Heritage Foundation and their associates in the Federalist Society have been influencing judgeships for quite some time.
They even provide Republicans a list of recommended nominees, those committed to a conservative (and often FAR RIGHT) IDEOLOGY. And like I said, this conservative led SCOTUS has been largely catering to Trump's maladministration and Republicans for some time in their shadow documents, at times deciding in their favor with little or no deliberation.
Opinions | The Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ helped Trump 28 times. Biden is 0 for 1.
Only of late, shortly after news of their actions saw light of day, did justices Barrett, Breyer (a liberal), and Thomas speak of concerns about their public perception, though the last, Thomas (the most biased among them naturally), took a defensive posture in which he attempted to deny that partiality.
Justice Barrett Concerned About Public Perception of Supreme Court | RealClearPolitics
Stephen Breyer worries about Supreme Court's public standing in current political era - CNNPolitics
Clarence Thomas warns against 'destroying our institutions,' defends the Supreme Court | TheHill
21 Jan 2022 8:50 pm
It clearly doesn't.StrictlyCashNCarry » 21 Jan 2022, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Like I said--it's not capitalized. Your own source shows that.
Now get to calculating or admitting.
21 Jan 2022 8:55 pm
The term "affirmative action" appears 17 times in your own document without being capitalized.
21 Jan 2022 8:58 pm
Get with your calculating.StrictlyCashNCarry » 21 Jan 2022, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑ The term "affirmative action" appears 17 times in your own document without being capitalized.
Now.
21 Jan 2022 8:58 pm
I did. 17 times.
Who is online
In total there are 2748 users online :: 13 registered, 13 bots, and 2722 guests
Registered users: *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Squatchman, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: proximic, coccocbot, facebookexternalhit, Mojeek, YandexBot, Googlebot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Baiduspider, Applebot