Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Conservative Supreme Court
The Conservative Supreme Court
By B.See
9 Dec 2021 2:36 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
21 Jan 2022 9:01 pm
Another coward.
@Huey
@Vegas
@neue regel
@Zeets2
@Deezer Shoove
21 Jan 2022 9:01 pm
Not capitalized.Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Another coward.
@Huey
@Vegas
@neue regel
@Zeets2
@Deezer Shoove
21 Jan 2022 9:31 pm
As always, I can only answer in kind:Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2022, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑ According to whom was SCOTUS "liberal" and when?
Not all if us are hip to The Gospel of Slizzy, Slizzy..
**** you, stupid.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
21 Jan 2022 9:36 pm
B.See » 09 Dec 2021, 3:36 am » wrote: ↑ As some may recall, several months ago, certain conservative members of the Supreme Court suddenly became "concerned" about the public's perception of their (quite apparent) right winged partiality, as if the EVIDENCE of the fact might've somehow escaped the attention of anyone half paying attention.
After all, they only undermined landmark legislation like Affirmative Action and the Voting Rights Act. "Nothing to see here" eh?
And the GOP only bitched and moaned when, shortly after later conservative shenanigans on the part of Trump's SCOTUS, a few Democrats WHISPERED about adding more justices to the bench... JUST a whisper, mind you, because Democrats are mostly best at bringing knives to gunfights.
Never mind that McConnell and company blocked Obama's pick (Merrick Garland), though given Garlands rather milksop approach to prosecuting Trump, prolly just as well, and they fairly CHORTLED at the notion of NEVER affirming a ninth justice if Hillary had won the presidency.
Because unlike Democrats, they make up ways to do whatever **** they WANT to do... on the fly.
SO, given the above, it didn't exactly take a rocket scientist to figure out WHY their sudden compulsion to go public about the public's perception of their obvious political BIAS. Obviously SOMETHING was in the wind or down that old proverbial "pike." Nor did it take long for things to become a little CLEARER (for those who hadn't yet figured it OUT) exactly WHAT:
There is no doubt any more: the US supreme court is run by partisan hacks | Robert Reich | The Guardian
SCOTUS will gaslight us until the end.
More leftist spew ****.
21 Jan 2022 9:41 pm
Libs take whatever I say so **** seriously.B.See » 21 Jan 2022, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't know if I'd call it "honesty." More like concern that the public is catching wind of what they're UP TO. Long before this "honesty" the court (shadow docket) has reportedly been catering to Trump & Co's beck and call. Now the cat's out of the bag, as it were so... c.y.a. time.
Truly laughable and ineffectual attempts at a "gotcha!".
How about SCOTUS may be a trifle less dishonest?
****...
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
21 Jan 2022 11:32 pm
Stay in your lane, Coozie.DeezerShoove » 21 Jan 2022, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ As always, I can only answer in kind:
**** you, stupid.
Rush was NOT a font of wisdom.
21 Jan 2022 11:33 pm
Oh, Cooze....you got this, dog...DeezerShoove » 21 Jan 2022, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Libs take whatever I say so **** seriously.
Truly laughable and ineffectual attempts at a "gotcha!".
How about SCOTUS may be a trifle less dishonest?
****...
21 Jan 2022 11:37 pm
@Jantje_Smit
22 Jan 2022 1:44 am
Perhaps you care to explain what's untrue about it?
22 Jan 2022 1:45 am
Has nothing to do with taking you seriously or not taking you seriously. You made an observation and I made one of my own. That IS allowed isn't it?DeezerShoove » 21 Jan 2022, 10:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Libs take whatever I say so **** seriously.
Truly laughable and ineffectual attempts at a "gotcha!".
How about SCOTUS may be a trifle less dishonest?
****...
22 Jan 2022 4:27 am
I don't do counting... you should take that up with @Isabel ... she can count to dozens...
In memory of Pumpkins
22 Jan 2022 7:19 am
Yes, absolutely.B.See » 22 Jan 2022, 2:45 am » wrote: ↑ Has nothing to do with taking you seriously or not taking you seriously. You made an observation and I made one of my own. That IS allowed isn't it?
Wasn't trying to challenge you specifically.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
22 Jan 2022 7:29 am
No problem here. My clarity about life in general is fine.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2022, 12:32 am » wrote: ↑ Stay in your lane, Coozie.
Rush was NOT a font of wisdom.
I see you as a sufferer of agoraphobia.
Staying in your lane is of paramount importance, Momma's Boy.
Do you have an escape room for when your shared-wall neighbor
finally realizes you may be part of the purge?
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
22 Jan 2022 7:34 am
What does either a liberal or conservative "supreme Court" Conserve.B.See » 09 Dec 2021, 3:36 am » wrote: ↑ As some may recall, several months ago, certain conservative members of the Supreme Court suddenly became "concerned" about the public's perception of their (quite apparent) right winged partiality, as if the EVIDENCE of the fact might've somehow escaped the attention of anyone half paying attention.
After all, they only undermined landmark legislation like Affirmative Action and the Voting Rights Act. "Nothing to see here" eh?
And the GOP only bitched and moaned when, shortly after later conservative shenanigans on the part of Trump's SCOTUS, a few Democrats WHISPERED about adding more justices to the bench... JUST a whisper, mind you, because Democrats are mostly best at bringing knives to gunfights.
Never mind that McConnell and company blocked Obama's pick (Merrick Garland), though given Garlands rather milksop approach to prosecuting Trump, prolly just as well, and they fairly CHORTLED at the notion of NEVER affirming a ninth justice if Hillary had won the presidency.
Because unlike Democrats, they make up ways to do whatever **** they WANT to do... on the fly.
SO, given the above, it didn't exactly take a rocket scientist to figure out WHY their sudden compulsion to go public about the public's perception of their obvious political BIAS. Obviously SOMETHING was in the wind or down that old proverbial "pike." Nor did it take long for things to become a little CLEARER (for those who hadn't yet figured it OUT) exactly WHAT:
There is no doubt any more: the US supreme court is run by partisan hacks | Robert Reich | The Guardian
SCOTUS will gaslight us until the end.
Vernacular tribalism until extinction arrives.
22 Jan 2022 7:35 am
B.See » 09 Dec 2021, 3:36 am » wrote: ↑ As some may recall, several months ago, certain conservative members of the Supreme Court suddenly became "concerned" about the public's perception of their (quite apparent) right winged partiality, as if the EVIDENCE of the fact might've somehow escaped the attention of anyone half paying attention.
After all, they only undermined landmark legislation like Affirmative Action and the Voting Rights Act. "Nothing to see here" eh?
And the GOP only bitched and moaned when, shortly after later conservative shenanigans on the part of Trump's SCOTUS, a few Democrats WHISPERED about adding more justices to the bench... JUST a whisper, mind you, because Democrats are mostly best at bringing knives to gunfights.
Never mind that McConnell and company blocked Obama's pick (Merrick Garland), though given Garlands rather milksop approach to prosecuting Trump, prolly just as well, and they fairly CHORTLED at the notion of NEVER affirming a ninth justice if Hillary had won the presidency.
Because unlike Democrats, they make up ways to do whatever **** they WANT to do... on the fly.
SO, given the above, it didn't exactly take a rocket scientist to figure out WHY their sudden compulsion to go public about the public's perception of their obvious political BIAS. Obviously SOMETHING was in the wind or down that old proverbial "pike." Nor did it take long for things to become a little CLEARER (for those who hadn't yet figured it OUT) exactly WHAT:
There is no doubt any more: the US supreme court is run by partisan hacks | Robert Reich | The Guardian
SCOTUS will gaslight us until the end.
can't hurt
22 Jan 2022 7:39 am
My shame knows no bounds..DeezerShoove » 22 Jan 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ No problem here. My clarity about life in general is fine.
I see you as a sufferer of agoraphobia.
Staying in your lane is of paramount importance, Momma's Boy.
Do you have an escape room for when your shared-wall neighbor
finally realizes you may be part of the purge?
22 Jan 2022 7:41 am
you are bound to serving denial cradle to grave.
22 Jan 2022 7:43 am
You are so easy.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
22 Jan 2022 7:47 am
Programmed mind is so predictable to stay on a linear grammatic timeline directing history repeating itself every generation maintaining social identities..
22 Jan 2022 7:47 am
And?
What rolling couch do you ride?
BTW, are you mods keeping an archive for yourselves?
Who is online
In total there are 3225 users online :: 6 registered, 12 bots, and 3207 guests
Bots: Bolt, proximic, okhttp, CriteoBot, ADmantX, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot, Googlebot, Baiduspider, curl/7