The identities of those birds is still the object of a Great Bird Hunt for BlaVe.omh » 22 Jan 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Programmed mind is so predictable to stay on a linear grammatic timeline directing history repeating itself every generation maintaining social identities..
Look at you mimicking BlackVegetable social personality.Deezer Shoove » 22 Jan 2022, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ The identities of those birds is still the object of a Great Bird Hunt for BlaVe.
I don't think he hates ALL birds . . . Just Herons.
He merely fears turkeys.
A Tufted Titmouse causes him little concern.
Even I think he could fare quite well in that battle.
I am mocking. Mimic/mock... It's all good.
Nah, you posted that before the data dump.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ And?
What rolling couch do you ride?
BTW, are you mods keeping an archive for yourselves?
Good for What? Passive aggressive control of other people's emotions and socially trained mind since birth conscience(Tribal mentality).
I control nothing.omh » 22 Jan 2022, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ Good for What? Passive aggressive control of other people's emotions and socially trained since birth conscience.
Not even yourself adapting to space mutually evolving here now.
Amen, brother.omh » 22 Jan 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Not even yourself adapting to space mutually evolving here now.
Translation: You've GOT NOTHING. But then again, neither does THIS guy. But that hasn't stopped him from TROLLING MY THREADS either.Gobsmack » 22 Jan 2022, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I could but leftists just keep denying it like all of them. Now you'll spew more **** like "So you got nothing", like all **** sucking commies do.
B.See » 23 Jan 2022, 5:26 am » wrote: ↑
Translation: You've GOT NOTHING. But then again, neither does THIS guy. But that hasn't stopped him from TROLLING MY THREADS either.

nefarious101 » 23 Jan 2022, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Toughen up.....pinch a baby and it cries....you ask to be pinched because you want to and like to cry
Facts nullify life in plain sight by missing links arriving through statistical averaged logistics comparing total sum past against arriving great great grandchildren forward.B.See » 24 Jan 2022, 11:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Only an ASSHOLE would think personal attacks nullify FACTS. But then again, such is the mind of a FASCIST.
You obviously didn't read the SCOTUS ruling. The courts aren't nearly as biased as you are apparently.B.See » 09 Dec 2021, 3:36 am » wrote: ↑ As some may recall, several months ago, certain conservative members of the Supreme Court suddenly became "concerned" about the public's perception of their (quite apparent) right winged partiality, as if the EVIDENCE of the fact might've somehow escaped the attention of anyone half paying attention.
After all, they only undermined landmark legislation like Affirmative Action and the Voting Rights Act. "Nothing to see here" eh?
And the GOP only bitched and moaned when, shortly after later conservative shenanigans on the part of Trump's SCOTUS, a few Democrats WHISPERED about adding more justices to the bench... JUST a whisper, mind you, because Democrats are mostly best at bringing knives to gunfights.
Never mind that McConnell and company blocked Obama's pick (Merrick Garland), though given Garlands rather milksop approach to prosecuting Trump, prolly just as well, and they fairly CHORTLED at the notion of NEVER affirming a ninth justice if Hillary had won the presidency.
Because unlike Democrats, they make up ways to do whatever **** they WANT to do... on the fly.
SO, given the above, it didn't exactly take a rocket scientist to figure out WHY their sudden compulsion to go public about the public's perception of their obvious political BIAS. Obviously SOMETHING was in the wind or down that old proverbial "pike." Nor did it take long for things to become a little CLEARER (for those who hadn't yet figured it OUT) exactly WHAT:
There is no doubt any more: the US supreme court is run by partisan hacks | Robert Reich | The Guardian
SCOTUS will gaslight us until the end.
Well here ya go, ****. I'm happy to help a cretin like you develop a simple understanding of your own **** up cohort.
Gorsuch is a **** headcase partisan who has it out for Democrats because he believes the stress of a contempt of Congress charge against his mother, who was the EPA Director in 1983, and her subsequent resignation, gave her the cancer that killed her. In fact, his mother was a **** political extortionist, just like Donald Trump with the Ukraine, who got caught using her office politically.anitamaria » 26 Jan 2022, 3:45 am » wrote: ↑ We have learned , over the last week that a supreme court justice, without his recusal was the sole dissenter. His wife receives hundreds of thousands of pounds from a far right organisation, you need to disclose conflicts of interest. If the highest court in our land is corrupted then there should be an immediate investigation into corruption at the supreme court level.!! Its so wrong!!!
It's the Gorsuch gene pool of **** malfeasance.The stand off ended in late February 1983, when Richard Hauser, the White House deputy counsel, confirmed one or more Reagan Administration officials had in fact reported to the White House that they had heard the E.P.A. administrator say at an Aug. 4 1982 luncheon that she was holding back more than $6 million in Federal funds to clean up the Stringfellow Acid Pits toxic waste site near Los Angeles to avoid helping the Senate campaign of former Gov. Jerry Brown of California, a Democrat.
The White House then abandoned its court claim that the documents related to this incident could not be subpoenaed by Congress because they were covered by executive privilege and the EPA turned the documents over to Congress. Gorsuch immediately resigned her post effective March 3, 1983, citing pressures caused by the media and the congressional investigation.
After all, things are made clear right there in the Declaration of Independence!B.See » 09 Dec 2021, 4:02 am » wrote: ↑ They will do what they figure they can get away with doing. And they APPARENTLY figure they can get away with just about ANYTHING.
We Always Knew Conservative Justices Would Tear Roe Down. The Latest SCOTUS Fight Proves It. – Mother Jones
Roe v. Wade In Serious Peril After Dramatic Supreme Court Arguments | HuffPost Latest News
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Kavanaugh and Barrett showed their cards.
Justice Sotomayor Expertly Exposed the **** of Mississippi’s Attack on Abortion Rights – Mother Jones
Justice Sotomayor makes the case for expanding the Supreme Court
you obviously don't live mutually adapting to space occupying time as one of a kind.LibDave » 26 Jan 2022, 1:53 am » wrote: ↑ You obviously didn't read the SCOTUS ruling. The courts aren't nearly as biased as you are apparently.