Liberal Forum

Huey » 14 Dec 2021, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:42 pm

You are not following your rule.

I posted about 10 links of stories
showing RGate was a hoax.

He deleted all of them - lol
 

Huey » 14 Dec 2021, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:43 pm

Whenever you see a PG thread with his name on it when you post facts that refute him it will be deleted.  He can’t control the discussion when that happens

hahahaaaaa

Poor lil guy.  LIB impotency.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2021, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:46 pm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... story.html

An exhaustive investigation led by members of President Trump’s own political party portrays his 2016 campaign as posing counterintelligence risks through its myriad contacts with Russia, eager to exploit assistance from the Kremlin and seemingly determined to conceal the full extent of its conduct from a multiyear Senate probe.

The long-awaited report from the Senate Intelligence Committee contains dozens of new findings that appear to show more direct links between Trump associates and Russian intelligence, and it pierces the president’s long-standing attempts to dismiss the Kremlin’s intervention on his behalf as a hoax.

Like the Mueller report before it, the nearly 1,000-page Senate document does not explicitly accuse the Trump campaign of direct collusion with Russian intelligence. But the Senate report carries particular weight because it is the first major investigation of Russian interference in 2016 to be conducted by a Republican-controlled committee and endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... y-new-book

The ex-major recalled: “For the KGB, it was a charm offensive. They had collected a lot of information on his personality so they knew who he was personally. The feeling was that he was extremely vulnerable intellectually, and psychologically, and he was prone to flattery.

fraud, lies, hoax
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2021, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:47 pm

What part of the findings of the Senate or US Intelligence hinges on that issue?

Sorry, follow your rules.  Post your citations.  My work here is done, Controlly.

MUELLER-

""we found no evidence of coordination with the Russian Federation""

Remember that day/night. Richard Maddow literally cried on her show.

Michael Moore tweeted that Mueller was a failure.

Huey » 14 Dec 2021, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:48 pm

Sorry, follow your rules.  Post your citations.  My work here is done, Controlly.

Another epic talking point fail.

Huey » 14 Dec 2021, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:53 pm

This trumps your senate report:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/04/durham- ... ested.html

Note the date.

GAME.  SET.  MATCH.

OUCH - you just kicked Lil Veggie in his pea pods  

 

Omicron420 » 14 Dec 2021, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:54 pm

OUCH - you just kicked Lil Veggie in his pea pods

He never admits he lost.  Now sit back and enjoy watching him flail around the forum spinning and claiming he won.

Huey » 14 Dec 2021, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 3:56 pm

He never admits he lost.  Now sit back and enjoy watching him flail around the forum spinning and claiming he won.

he is as big a troll and Slideman at .org
 

MUELLER-

""we found no evidence of coordination with the Russian Federation""
 

The ultimate result:

DEAD GUTTED Hillary ****

Material is: The ****

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2021, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 2:25 pm

No narratives..

All assertions must be supported by citations.

lol burden of proof is on you bro. There is no way to demonstrate that something didn't happen for which there is no evidence lol.

You can't even articulate what exactly your Russia Russia means. Who did what exactly?
 

MUELLER-


""we found no evidence of coordination with the Russian Federation""

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2021, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 4:03 pm

Not because you yap so.

Make a case.

YOU SAID no assertions or narrative.  You have citations.  You lose.  Chalk this up as yet another challenge you lost, beach boy Stroky.

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2021, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 4:04 pm

Entirely incidental

My last word on the topic.

Carter Paige was the impetus for the initial FISA warrant.  Incidental my **** ***.  Run a.one, you lost.

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm

The FBI did not use the Steele dossier to open Russia probehttps://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/0 ... ays-079030

Logic dictates that if Clinton paid for the FAKE DOSSIER

Then the entire apple is rotten      

You can't prove a negative or in this case something that never happened.

Indictments and charges for Trump Russian collusion? ZERO

Indictments for lying about Russian collusion? 2? 3? How many have been indicted for lying about Trump Russian collusion so far?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... rveillance

FISA court bans officials involved in Carter Page wiretaps from seeking surveillance
by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter | | March 04, 2020 10:42 PM



Justice Department and FBI officials under review for their role in the flawed wiretaps of former Trump campaign associate Carter Page are banned from having any involvement in the pursuit of electronic monitoring through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Judge James Boasberg issued a 19-page opinion on Wednesday, ordering that “no DOJ or FBI personnel under disciplinary or criminal review relating to their work on FISA applications shall participate in drafting, verifying, reviewing, or submitting such applications to the Court.”
 

Democrats Admit Trump-Russia Collusion Is Fake (Finally)

Throughout much of the presidential campaign of Donald Trump — or at least during the latter stages, as revelation after revelation about the Democrats was dumped by WikiLeaks — there was a steady drumbeat from the media, from the team working for Hillary Clinton and others that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia.

That is, that Russian hackers were responsible for the leaks ravaging the Democratic Party and Clinton, and WikiLeaks was merely the conduit the Russians were using to publish the information. There was even talk that the Russians were going to hack the election itself and affect the outcome.

In the end, ex-President Obama ended up denying there was any tampering with the election results by Russians, and now, finally, it appears the Democrats have all but conceded that media hype about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign isn’t backed up by even an ounce of truth.

An article on political website The Intercept by award-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald was quoted widely in the media recently wherein Greenwald stated that “key Democratic officials are clearly worried about the expectations [regarding Trump-Russia collusion] that have been purposely stoked and are now trying to tamp them down. Many of them tried to signal that the beliefs the base has been led to adopt have no basis in reason or evidence.”

Greenwald went on to call the Trump-Russia story a “fact-free conspiracy” and quoted at length globalist cheerleader Michael Morell, former acting head of the CIA for President Obama and one of the most prominent public officials to endorse Hillary Clinton for president in 2016. (Political watchers may remember Morell loudly calling for the death of aides to Vladimir Putin in an interview last August with PBS’ Charlie Rose.)