Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Dec 2021, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 8:53 am

It’s already done. You lost.

Sheilagh,

Make your case why the words I posted aren't an example of craven toadying..

 

Jantje_Smit » 19 Dec 2021, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 8:52 am

Iron deficiency much?

It took only one mouse click to dicover that... three pages of deflecting, asking questions and doing anything humanly possible but back up one of your claims takes a lot more effort...

 

But to make that assertion would normally require READING them.

For a European, you're unusually stupid.

Jantje_Smit » 19 Dec 2021, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 8:20 am

Nah, I checked... only 3 of the 7 pages are posts of BV....

 

       
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 8:55 am

Sheilagh,

Make your case why the words I posted aren't an example of craven toadying..

Already did.  The words were fact.  Posting factual words is not toadying, moron.   We are done here.  You lost.  Again.  

Huey » 19 Dec 2021, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 9:04 am

Already did.  The words were fact.  Posting factual words is not toadying, moron.   We are done here.  You lost.  Again.

Debunked.

It is also a "fact" that he said

"Fight like hell."

And that MO Brooks showed up in body armor.


**** brick.

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 8:58 am

But to make that assertion would normally require READING them.

For a European, you're unusually stupid.

Why would I need... or want... to read three pages of your posts to assert that you are a dickead, it's already common knowledge?

But since you don't get the obvious... just the fact that this thread is still going on after 7 pages and you're still here at it is enough information to make that assertion...

That's the rule... now acknowledge that you have been answered..

 


 


 

Jantje_Smit » 19 Dec 2021, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 9:19 am

Why would I need... or want... to read three pages of your posts to assert that you are a dickead, it's already common knowledge?

But since you don't get the obvious... just the fact that this thread is still going on after 7 pages and you're still here at it is enough information to make that assertion...

That's the rule... now acknowledge that you have been answered..

 

You suck at this, Brinker.

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 9:24 am

You suck at this, Brinker.

I don't think so... it seems to be working just fine...

 

 
 
 
 

Jantje_Smit » 19 Dec 2021, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 10:05 am

I don't think so... it seems to be working just fine...

 

 

For whom?


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 10:06 am

For whom?

For those who are calling you out to make an argument and back up your claims of course....

 


 
 

Jantje_Smit » 19 Dec 2021, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 11:19 am

For those who are calling you out to make an argument and back up your claims of course....

 

Name one who isn't lying.

Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2021, 11:36 pm

Nice panty dance..

In what specific context are you using "sexes"?

Your fetish has clearly been limited to the demands of  "civil" taxonomy.

Biology is the "context," fruitcake - as has been made clear repeatedly. 

Keep panty dancing, fruity. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ
 

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2021, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 1:45 pm

Biology is the "context," fruitcake - as has been made clear repeatedly. 

Keep panty dancing, fruity. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

Science?

We've exhausted that....and the dictionary.

Unless you want to argue that Human Anatomy is outside the boundaries of Biology.


Your little semantic tack is a loser.

Give it up already..
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 1:49 pm

Science?
 

Yes, fruity - specifically, the field of biology.

How many human sexes does BIOLOGY (not a Scottish tribunal or a pygmy band) recognize? And... PANTY DANCE!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm

Yes, fruity - specifically, the field of biology.

How many human sexes does BIOLOGY (not a Scottish tribunal or a pygmy band) recognize? And... PANTY DANCE!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

I am guessing he is claiming he already made a case and answered your questions.

Huey » 19 Dec 2021, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 2:21 pm

I am guessing he is claiming he already made a case and answered your questions.

Well of COURSE he is - that's the panty dance. 

He has told me a hundred times that he already told me and won't tell me again.

Claims he even posted a link to prove he was right about the number he didn't provide.       

 
 

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2021, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 2:23 pm

Well of COURSE he is - that's the panty dance. 

He has told me a hundred times that he already told me and won't tell me again.

Even posted a link to prove he was right - he gives me every assurance.     

Typical!    

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm

Yes, fruity - specifically, the field of biology.

How many human sexes does BIOLOGY (not a Scottish tribunal or a pygmy band) recognize? And... PANTY DANCE!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

(not a Scottish tribunal or a pygmy band)

if I'm gonna answer this question for the 115th time, Girlie, you're gonna need to list all the authorities acceptable to you..


Or I'm done wasting time on your panty dance 

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 2:25 pm

if I'm gonna answer this question for the 115th time, Girlie, you're gonna need to list all the authorities acceptable to you..

Or I'm done wasting time on your panty dance

Yes yes - we need to argue over what AUTHORITES to trust for the number you cannot produce. 

Let's START with a number, fruity - and let's argue authorities AFTER you have answered the question. 

HOW MANY HUMAN SEXES ARE THERE, FRUITY?

And... panty dance - do this now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

Huey » 19 Dec 2021, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2021, 2:21 pm

I am guessing he is claiming he already made a case and answered your questions.

Tell me EXACTLY what's wrong with this answer?

viewtopic.php?p=1890543#p1890543