No...FOS » 19 Dec 2021, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Why not?? You made a claim for which there was no evidence and you couldn't provide any.. and you are not retracting your claim.. it is that simple
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No...
I have already, ruthlessly,, eviscerated that twaddle.
Now I'm field dressing the carcass...
Just because you don't understand the matter doesn't make it irrelevant crap.FOS » 19 Dec 2021, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ well I missed it. I just saw you talking about irrelevant crap that was simply a question of fact around a timetable.
perhaps you don't understand what relevance means.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Just because you don't understand the matter doesn't make it irrelevant crap.
No..FOS » 19 Dec 2021, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ perhaps you don't understand what relevance means.
that's the only conclusion I can draw. X said you before z...is neither advocacy nor disavowal...it is just a claim of fact.
it isbtrue or false. That's all. You have claimed nothing either way.
but it means nothing about the subject at hand
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Just because you don't understand the matter doesn't make it irrelevant crap.
This was not a question about facts other than,as the op suggests, 'toadying'.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No..
That's just ****.
This is about facts.
You might as well just keep drinking and move on.
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No..
That's just ****.
This is about facts.
You might as well just keep drinking and move on.
make that argument, ******.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑ If you want to step in for @Huey ...
Do you have any idea of the issue?
There is an established time line of 187 minutes...between the time the riot at the Capitol began, and the time that Grifty made an effort to stop it...
Yes...that is why I used it.FOS » 19 Dec 2021, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ can you please define 'toadying' for the court? Do you understand what the word means?
This isn't even relevant. You are arguing over facts and not opinions. This has nothing to with 'toadying'Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ There is an established time line of 187 minutes...between the time the riot at the Capitol began, and the time that Grifty made an effort to stop it...
What informs your belief that it is otherwise?
Don't.....shhhhhh....FOS » 19 Dec 2021, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ This isn't even relevant. You are arguing over facts and not opinions. This has nothing to with 'toadying'
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes...that is why I used it.
You may look it up, CC.
Have you looked it up?Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2021, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes...that is why I used it.
You may look it up, CC.
No...if you believe it is inapt, explain why.
I didn't need to.
I don't believe you know what the word means. You can't answer my question.
Then pass out.