Liberal Forum

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:47 am

No case. Make it with MY comments in the OP.  

Thanks.  Remember, you are using THAT COMMENT to claim I am toady.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:48 am

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:47 am

No case. Make it with MY comments in the OP.  

Thanks.  Remember, you are using THAT COMMENT to claim I am toady.

Go put some ice on that, Cowardly Toady..



 

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:44 am

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:41 am

Post the OP.  Help you remember.  You made my comments all about Trump.  My comments were not about Trump.  They were about the PROTESTORS.  This would have been cleared up a while back if you were man enough to make a case and drop the wannabe Matlock routine.  

If you had simply stated your case from the get go (you didn't) and have to make all comments about Trump you would not have been embarrassed.

Blah,  blah, blah.


Who is the "elected official"?


First time.
 

 

Huey » 16 Dec 2021, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2021, 8:11 am

Blackvegetable » 16 Dec 2021, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2021, 8:09 am

Huey » 16 Dec 2021, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2021, 8:03 am

I know.  Over the last few weeks I have drastically cut down the amount of attention I pay the Taco Bell dog.  He is not handling it well.

Stalky, please.

You're on a years long losing tear.

The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying....everything I told you about it is being revealed. Again.

Sidney Powell and Mike Flynn have exposed themselves as the grifting clowns they are..

John Solomon is a fading memory..




 


 

Start a thread and list out all of my Jan 6th toadying, Hijacker.  Make your case.  You will be sorely disappointed and will suffer yet another loss, Big L.  

I do notice a trend here.  People are starting to ignore your attempts to hijack and control threads.  The Adam Schiff thread was a great example.  No one cares about your reframes.  

 

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:56 am

I was referring to the PROTESTORS.  Next, you were instructed to start a thread because you were hijacking that one which was about SOCCER PLAYER and covid.  You got your *** kicked on that one also so you do what you do.  Hijack and reframe.

Either post this list and state your case or you keep the ice.  You need it.

I was referring to the PROTESTORS.  

Next, you were instructed to start a thread

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 8:59 am

No...you referred to an "elected official".

Singular.

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:00 am

Post the comment.  And don't forget that list!

 

When you post the list and the comment and state your case we can continue.

PS.  Do you recall 2:38 PM?

PS.  Do you recall 2:38 PM?

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:02 am

Scroll up.

Who is the "elected official", Askholio?

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:04 am

You got that list?

Instead of asking stupid questions make you case, Big L.  Now back to the comments in the OP.  Keep running, lil Bastard.

You should be familiar with these rules hence you can't bitch about them:

No narratives..

All assertions must be supported by citations.

Blackvegetable » 16 Dec 2021, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2021, 6:36 pm

Are these your words?

viewtopic.php?p=1856569#p1856569

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:07 am

Are these your words?

First time.

Huey » 07 Jan 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:18 am

Waiting for that list and case.  That came first.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:23 am

...That was post #20. 

In memory of Pumpkins

Jantje_Smit » 07 Jan 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:40 am

I didn't bother to read to read all of this.... everyone already knows you can't make an argument and you never back up your claims... but it's 16 pages already and your post isn't #20 but #310... learn to count... dickhead...

 
 

Jantje_Smit » 07 Jan 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:40 am

I didn't bother to read to read all of this.... everyone already knows you can't make an argument and you never back up your claims... but it's 16 pages already and your post isn't #20 but #310... learn to count... dickhead...

 
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2022, 9:49 am

You're a moron, Brinker.

In memory of Pumpkins

Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2021, 10:18 am

Ps.  If it would have taken you two moves you would have done it w days ago.  You are now reframing.  Another of your tactics.   Here is my stance since you have already lost.  

1. On the day of the riot I posted that they should have been shot as they were scaling the walls because the majority of leadership was in that building.  Both houses of Congress, all their leaders, the sitting Vice President and the incoming vice President,

2.  I have posted that anyone involved should be convicted of their charged crimes and suffer the appropriate punishment for that crime.

3.  There was no insurrection.  To this point no one has even been charged with that.  Oh, that is another of your lost challenges.

Now, that is my stance in re: Jan 6th.

Your statement:

The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying

It is now up to you to explain how that is Jan 6th toadying.  Whatever the **** that means.  

Get to it, boy.

Blackvegetable » 16 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm

Dwarf,

What I am looking for is the rule under which I am, in any way, obliged to participate. 

Then I want you to post the Rules of Engagement for BOTH parties in these situations,, lest there be any confusion moving forward..

Last I want to see your stipulation that these rules apply to you as well.

Do you understand?

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 3:32 pm

Bump

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 07 Nov 2022, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 2:22 pm

Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2021, 10:18 am

Ps.  If it would have taken you two moves you would have done it w days ago.  You are now reframing.  Another of your tactics.   Here is my stance since you have already lost.  

1. On the day of the riot I posted that they should have been shot as they were scaling the walls because the majority of leadership was in that building.  Both houses of Congress, all their leaders, the sitting Vice President and the incoming vice President,

2.  I have posted that anyone involved should be convicted of their charged crimes and suffer the appropriate punishment for that crime.

3.  There was no insurrection.  To this point no one has even been charged with that.  Oh, that is another of your lost challenges.

Now, that is my stance in re: Jan 6th.

Your statement:

The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying

It is now up to you to explain how that is Jan 6th toadying.  Whatever the **** that means.  

Get to it, boy.

@Blackvegetable  
 

 

Vegas » 07 Nov 2022, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 3:36 pm

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 3:32 pm

Bump

How do you not see how dumb you look when you bring up old threads on a frequent basis? 

Obviously, you are trying to deflect from something. 

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm

You're a **** idiot.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 07 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm

You're a **** idiot.