Ask Naffy if he ever neutralized a larger assailant, while blinded...
Ask him yourself.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Ask Naffy if he ever neutralized a larger assailant, while blinded...
Still no argument. But keep bragging.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Ask Naffy if he ever neutralized a larger assailant, while blinded...
Dwarf,
Still no argument. Go read the thread you got it from.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
Gird your loins.
Identify the "elected official", and take your beatdown.
Or don't, and stay under the porch.
@BlackvegetableHuey » 16 Dec 2021, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ A call out thread for BV to back up these comments:
@Blackvegetable these are your words:
Stalky, please.
You're on a years long losing tear.
The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying....everything I told you about it is being revealed. Again.
Sidney Powell and Mike Flynn have exposed themselves as the grifting clowns they are..
John Solomon is a fading memory..
This is the point of contention:
The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying....everything I told you about it is being revealed. Again.
viewtopic.php?p=1889930#p1889930
Make your cases showing all of this toadying about Jan 6th. Man up. PG is enabled for any attempts to reframe or hijack the thread. Stay on topic.
Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
You made a statement. Now YOU ask for clarification. You probably should have asked a few months ago. You lose.
Dwarf,Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
You made a statement. Now YOU ask for clarification. You probably should have asked a few months ago. You lose.
If you don’t know you can’t make that statement. You participated in the original discussion, did not have any confusion over who was being discussed, and when you get you pr *** kicked this week suddenly you are confused.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
I'm telling you to name the "elected official " to whom you refer.
Do you know?
I did.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ If you don’t know you can’t make that statement. You participated in the original discussion, did not have any confusion over who was being discussed, and when you get you pr *** kicked this week suddenly you are confused.
you know the rules of thread. Now make ylur Case. THEN you May ask ONE QUESTION.
You have not told me how that post supports your statement. Tick tock. After you do that THEN ylu May get the answer.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑I did.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ If you don’t know you can’t make that statement. You participated in the original discussion, did not have any confusion over who was being discussed, and when you get you pr *** kicked this week suddenly you are confused.
you know the rules of thread. Now make ylur Case. THEN you May ask ONE QUESTION.
Now confirm it..
You know how you hate ambiguity..
The minute you take a stand, this is over in 2 moves.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ You have not told me how that post supports your statement. Tick tock. After you do that THEN ylu May get the answer.
I don’t need to take a stand. You made a false statement and refuse to back it up. Let me know when you do, tough guy,Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ The minute you take a stand, this is over in 2 moves.
No...you do..Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t need to take a stand. You made a false statement and refuse to back it up. Let me know when you do, tough guy,
Ps. If it would have taken you two moves you would have done it w days ago. You are now reframing. Another of your tactics. Here is my stance since you have already lost.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑The minute you take a stand, this is over in 2 moves.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ You have not told me how that post supports your statement. Tick tock. After you do that THEN ylu May get the answer.
Look at all that ****..Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Ps. If it would have taken you two moves you would have done it w days ago. You are now reframing. Another of your tactics. Here is my stance since you have already lost.
1. On the day of the riot I posted that they should have been shot as they were scaling the walls because the majority of leadership was in that building. Both houses of Congress, all their leaders, the sitting Vice President and the incoming vice President,
2. I have posted that anyone involved should be convicted of their charged crimes and suffer the appropriate punishment for that crime.
3. There was no insurrection. To this point no one has even been charged with that. Oh, that is another of your lost challenges.
Now, that is my stance in re: Jan 6th.
Your statement:
The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying
It is now up to you to explain how that is Jan 6th toadying. Whatever the **** that means.
Get to it, boy.
That is my stance on Jan 6th. Stop reframing. Come on down and I’ll show you how to man up and teach you how to subdue a larger opponent without getting pepper sprayed.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Look at all that ****..
Still running.
Man up, Sheilagh.
You have been shown your words.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ That is my stance on Jan 6th. Stop reframing. Come on down and I’ll show you how to man up and teach you how to subdue a larger opponent without getting pepper sprayed.
So? You have not told us how those words make me a toady for Jan 6thBlackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ You have been shown your words.
You may now make the case that you aren't a toady of the "elected official".
Answer the question.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ So? You have not told us how those words make me a toady for Jan 6th
your words:
The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying