keep running. You have my stance concerning Jan 6th.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Answer the question.
2 moves to closure.
#readhissig
I don't give a **** about what you claim to be your "stance"..
No, this is about your comment you have not backed up yet.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ I don't give a **** about what you claim to be your "stance"..
This is about what you've actually posted.
Now stop running like a little bitch, little bitch.
Nope you did not need answers when you made your statement.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Answer the question.
2 moves to closure.
#readhissig
No...it's now about your words, which have been posted for days.
you will have to start your own thread.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ No...it's now about your words, which have been posted for days.
That's right.
Now make your case. This is great!Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ That's right.
But you're the one in doubt, demanding that I show you what a toady you are.
Now identify the "elected official" without further ******.
@BlackvegetableHuey » 18 Dec 2021, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Ps. If it would have taken you two moves you would have done it w days ago. You are now reframing. Another of your tactics. Here is my stance since you have already lost.
1. On the day of the riot I posted that they should have been shot as they were scaling the walls because the majority of leadership was in that building. Both houses of Congress, all their leaders, the sitting Vice President and the incoming vice President,
2. I have posted that anyone involved should be convicted of their charged crimes and suffer the appropriate punishment for that crime.
3. There was no insurrection. To this point no one has even been charged with that. Oh, that is another of your lost challenges.
Now, that is my stance in re: Jan 6th.
Your statement:
The facts are humiliating your Proud Jan. 6th toadying
It is now up to you to explain how that is Jan 6th toadying. Whatever the **** that means.
Get to it, boy.
Answer the question, and make a liar of me, ******.
Acknowledge the identity of the "elected official"...there were several.
if you are not aware and participate in that discussion you are a moron.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Acknowledge the identity of the "elected official"...there were several.
The answer is in the OP I quoted in the post. It is your thread.Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Answer the question, and make a liar of me, ******.
Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2021, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑I don't give a **** about what you claim to be your "stance"..
This is about what you've actually posted.
Now stop running like a little bitch, little bitch.
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2021, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ (CNN)A federal judge suggested Friday that former President Donald Trump had some responsibility for the January 6 attack on the Capitol and that rioters were pawns provoked into action.
Speaking at sentencing hearing for rioter John Lolos, the judge said rallygoers like him were "called to Washington, DC, by an elected official, prompted to walk to the Capitol by an elected official."
Judge Amit Mehta called individuals who stormed the building "a pawn in the game played by people who know better."
Ya think?
Just to clear @Blackvegetable you do not know who the “elected official” is in your own OP and you have to ask me?Huey » 20 Nov 2021, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑And yet the riot started BFEORE an elected official said they were going to walk patriotically and peaceably to the capitol.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2021, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ (CNN)A federal judge suggested Friday that former President Donald Trump had some responsibility for the January 6 attack on the Capitol and that rioters were pawns provoked into action.
Speaking at sentencing hearing for rioter John Lolos, the judge said rallygoers like him were "called to Washington, DC, by an elected official, prompted to walk to the Capitol by an elected official."
Judge Amit Mehta called individuals who stormed the building "a pawn in the game played by people who know better."
Ya think?
I note your article does not say insurrection-its but calls him a RIOTER.
I know.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑
Just to clear @Blackvegetable you do not know who the “elected official” is in your own OP and you have to ask me?
LMAO! Told ylu the answer was on that thread.
I posted you Op that has the answer and the context of my comments. Now that you have the answer, and you question quota is used up, a,e that case in two moves based on my Jan 6th
This isn't a **** Easter Egg Hunt, ******.Huey » 18 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I posted you Op that has the answer and the context of my comments. Now that you have the answer, and you question quota is used up, a,e that case in two moves based on my Jan 6th
position.