You have exhausted my willingness to indulge you.Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You have used up your question quota. To this point you are proving you are unable to support your words, make a case, and offer a narrative to support what you post.
Congenital supremacy? That's kind of a reach don't you think? Blackvegetable.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You have exhausted my willingness to indulge you.
Either identify the "elected official" to whom you refer, or admit my congenital supremacy.
Run from your words, mommies little ******.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑You have exhausted my willingness to indulge you.Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You have used up your question quota. To this point you are proving you are unable to support your words, make a case, and offer a narrative to support what you post.
Either identify the "elected official" to whom you refer, or admit my congenital supremacy.
Have you clarified YOUR words?
Dwarf,
Nope, it is about you backing up your words. Which haven’t done.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
I'm right here..
It's about your words.
Let's get it done.
Mommies lil ****** boy admits he has no case if I need to clarify old posts. You lose.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑Have you clarified YOUR words?
If you don't identify the "elected official", I could do the work and you'd insist you were talking about Mo Brooks.Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Mommies lil ****** boy admits he has no case if I need to clarify old posts. You lose.
With your words...which I'm doing.Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, it is about you backing up your words. Which haven’t done.
I accept your acknowledgement.
Sorry, if you need clarification on a post you are basing your comment on you don’t have a case.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ If you don't identify the "elected official", I could do the work and you'd insist you were talking about Mo Brooks.
Now answer, ******.
No..Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. If you need details, or clarification for that list that means you did not understand it. Which also means you had no basis for the toady comment because you did understand the post you based it on.
2. To see if we agree you must make your case as to how a post you don’t understand ties into your toady comment.
3. When you do that, and I respond, you may then ask me ONE more question.
I am running this PG thread as you run yours.
No preconditions.Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. If you need details, or clarification for that list that means you did not understand it. Which also means you had no basis for the toady comment because you did understand the post you based it on.
2. To see if we agree you must make your case as to how a post you don’t understand ties into your toady comment.
3. When you do that, and I respond, you may then ask me ONE more question.
I am running this PG thread as you run yours.
you have already lost.
You're the one running.
no, I am waiting for your argument. The longer you take the more you prove the point of this whole exercise.
Answer the question about your words, and you're back in your box in 2 moves...Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ no, I am waiting for your argument. The longer you take the more you prove the point of this whole exercise.
no, controlled, ylu know what you have to do. Keep running from your words,Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Answer the question about your words, and you're back in your box in 2 moves...
Yea...Huey » 17 Dec 2021, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ no, controlled, ylu know what you have to do. Keep running from your words,
physical coward.
Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2021, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Yea...
I gotta leave you under the porch.
Two moves.
Answer the question.