Yes we need to start calling them what they are.B.See » 12 Apr 2022, 12:27 am » wrote: ↑ NOTE: For those wanting to see the definition of "fascism" here's a suggestion: LOOK IT THE **** UP!
Moving right along:
Wisconsin communities see startling uptick in white supremacist activity - Raw Story
Far-right conspiracy theorists triumphant at Colorado Republican state assembly - Raw Story
GOP Official Refuses to Resign After Calling for 'Lynching' of ‘Vile’ Democrats
AND NOW, THIS:
OANN whines John Oliver calling them a ‘ragtag band of fascists’ breached its AT&T contract
To which John Oliver in last Sunday's "Last Week Tonight" more or less said, "**** you."
He's nothing but a TROLL, whose sole purpose (like some others here) is to bury facts under **** drive-by **** posting. Any MORON can do that.
Thanks for the link, Slide. MUCH appreciated. I've several threads in the LIberal's forum that also delve into who and WHAT Trump and his fascist MAGAS really are.slideman » 25 Apr 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Yes we need to start calling them what they are.
"How Fascism Works' Author On Trump's Attempts To Overturn Election Results
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/21/93763817 ... on-results
Stfu *** nazi
I've been busy dealing with other annoying pests so maybe I missed it... has anyone told you lately that no one gives a ****?B.See » 27 Apr 2022, 5:01 am » wrote: ↑
IN MORE FASCIST NEWS, THEIR FOILED PLOT TO OVERTHROW DEMOCRACY..

Here's a newsflash for ya,Jantje_Smit » 27 Apr 2022, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I've been busy dealing with other annoying pests so maybe I missed it... has anyone told you lately that no one gives a ****?
I keep track of how many views these posts get..............k??And now you have one more view to keep track off... no one gives a **** about that either...B.See » 27 Apr 2022, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Here's a newsflash for ya,I keep track of how many views these posts get..............k??

Yours and 192 others in approx. 48 hours. SOMEBODY'S reading them, CHUMP.Jantje_Smit » 27 Apr 2022, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ And now you have one more view to keep track off... no one gives a **** about that either...
B.See » 27 Apr 2022, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Yours and 192 others in approx. 48 hours. SOMEBODY'S reading them, CHUMP.

didn't edit the way I wanted it too.B.See » 27 Apr 2022, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Yours and 192 others in approx. 48 hours. SOMEBODY'S reading them, CHUMP.
Quality over quantity. Figures lie and liars figure creating reasons to never accept how genetics control numbers present all the time people never get reproduced twice, ever.B.See » 27 Apr 2022, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Yours and 192 others in approx. 48 hours. SOMEBODY'S reading them, CHUMP.
I have no sympathy for those refusing to accept life in plain sight, individually or group think, family tree or national or global mentality believing anything is possible rather than accepting what isn't.
NWORomh » 28 Apr 2022, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ Quality over quantity. Figures lie and liars figure creating reasons to never accept how genetics control numbers present all the time people never get reproduced twice, ever.
meh... as if anyone would've EVER noticed.
the few in command of the many demanding human rights to ignore how living happens spontaneously alive since conceived simultaneously here as one of a kind minding supplied facts defining life socially, theologically, theoretically, philosophically, psychologically making context to communicate the means of governing tomorrow's outcomes currently.