Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Math Behind My Vax Decision
The Math Behind My Vax Decision
By Cannonpointer
31 Dec 2021 3:00 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Jan 2022 3:59 pm
ha ha ha ha great deflection, bet you think that is relevant to what is actually taking place? Everyone blowing smoke from all sides to escalate orchestrated chaos forward.Liberals are scum » 04 Jan 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Odd how you guys don't take in to account that 8 billion doses have been given to people 57 percent of the people in the world have had it and mostly with no ill effects
4 Jan 2022 4:04 pm
Liberalsarescum » 04 Jan 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Odd how you guys don't take in to account that 8 billion doses have been given to people 57 percent of the people in the world have had it and mostly with no ill effects
Who are "you guys?" I am only taking into account Cannon's circumstance.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 4:06 pm
Gee what are facts composed of? Speculation and socially arranged fruition of ideas life is more than genetics being eternally separated ancestries now in plain sight of each ancestor inhabiting space as timed apart here in ancestral order of numbers existing so far.
4 Jan 2022 4:07 pm
Alzheimers » 04 Jan 2022, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Math looks good.
I am sure @Blackvegetable will want more "parameters"...
Veghead will pretend that he knows what I am talking about by asking all sorts of fancy questions that have little to nothing to do with the topic. I don't answer his questions, ever. Why? Because he never answers questions himself, ever.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 4:15 pm
He is called Darth Evader for a reason.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 4:16 pm
That would have to be a stupid one, even by beevee standards.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL. You aren't a lying narcissist like he is. You know how they are. They pretend to know everything. He once told @Huey that he could drive an 18 wheeler because he drove a manual car through the Rockies once.
Some days, he's really on the heavy underwear fumes.
He wears his skidmarked panties as a mask, to virtue signal.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Jan 2022 4:18 pm
Keep whistling past the grave yard, stupid proggie ****. The death toll keeps growing and you keep whistling right past the evidence.Liberalsarescum » 04 Jan 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Odd how you guys don't take in to account that 8 billion doses have been given to people 57 percent of the people in the world have had it and mostly with no ill effects
There's a thread on the front page RIGHT NOW about a 40% spike in the death rates of working aged people in Indiana - and that's WITHOUT 100% compliance.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Jan 2022 4:23 pm
Wherever my *** is, you can look for this cat's tongue,Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Who are "you guys?" I am only taking into account Cannon's circumstance.
He has defended vax naziism, jim crow - anything I stand against, he stands for. He is a stealth democrat.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Jan 2022 4:24 pm
Hot off the resses at CNN and MSNBC, proggie brings "facts."
We have ourselves beevee junior over here.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Jan 2022 4:31 pm
People are stupid sheeple. They want to stay stupid and let Rachael Maddow sell them drugs while insisting on remaining Big Pharma's bitches.Cannonpointer » 31 Dec 2021, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is a study from JAMA about "post market safety events" in the first decade of this century, showing that 32% of new medications, after initially passing muster, were found to present dangers not known to regulators when they were approved: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2625319
Here's an NPR report on the same Yale study referenced above, which reads, "Seventy-one of the 222 drugs approved in the first decade of the millennium were withdrawn, required a "black box" warning on side effects or warranted a safety announcement about new risks, Dr. Joseph Ross, an associate professor of medicine at Yale School of Medicine, and colleagues reported in JAMA on Tuesday. The study included safety actions through Feb. 28."
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... a-approval
They are ready to stand in line to receive Merck's new drug Molnupiravir (at $700) that only reduces COVID mortality by 30%.
Why would Merck try to kill their Nobel Prize winning miracle drug for COVID?
That may wind up causing cancer.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sZp8Y6JJDRMq/
Rather than reduce mortality by 99+% with $20 early treatment protocols that include IVM or HCQ, that are both time-tested safer than aspirin, Tylenol or Benadryl.
Why would Merck try to kill their Nobel Prize winning miracle drug for COVID?
Idiots trusting them even after Merck killed a half a million people with their arthritis drug Vioxx.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=vioxx+deaths&t=ffab&ia=web
Merck Manipulated the Science about the Drug Vioxx
4 Jan 2022 4:31 pm
Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2022, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Wherever my *** is, you can look for this cat's tongue,
He has defended vax naziism, jim crow - anything I stand against, he stands for. He is a stealth democrat.
LiberalsAreScum is a stealth Dimocrat?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 4:32 pm
You tell me, buddy:
We ALL know the rule: If it disproportionately affects blacks, it's racist jim crow. UNLESS you are a democrat - then you make excuses. Suddenly, "Everybody" is involved - so it's okay, and **** the ***.Liberalsarescum » 04 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑Well pin head every one in some demo city's have to show vaxed status , no matter what race you are .Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Demonrats understand that blacks are very cautious, after 50 years of democrats testing end-stage syphilis results using blacks as guinea pigs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study
So they are taking advantage to lock blacks out of public eateries, water fountains and such, using the cover of voter identification laws. If you cannot show ID, you need not show up to vote - you will not be allowed to cast your ballot. And stay your dirty black *** out of our restaurants, too.
Vaxports are the new jim crow - same democrat party.
That is the position fruitcake took - the demonrat position. He actually gave my post exposing his demonrat buddies a reddie!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Jan 2022 4:33 pm
Think cp is toying with the excitable lad as she's prone to do.
4 Jan 2022 5:40 pm
Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It looks like you are spot on, but there is a little more math that needs to be done for no other reason than to prove it mathematically. I believe (though I may be wrong) that to find the real probabilities, there are 4 cases:Probabilities:
- vaccine with adverse conditions without infection
- Vaccine with adverse conditions with infection
- vaccine without adverse conditions with infection
- Vaccine without adverse conditions without infection
Case 1) .2 x .9997 = 19.994%
- Vaccine with adverse conditions = .2
- Vaccine without adverse conditions = .8
- Infected = 3/10000 = .03%
- Not infected = 99.97%
Case 2) .2 x .0003 = .006%
Case 3) .8 x .03 = 2.4%
Case 4) .8 x .9997 = 79.98%
Case 4 has the highest probability followed by Case 1. However, these are only the probabilities with the vaccine. I would say that case 2 is the most applicable to your argument. Very small probability, so you are spot on.
Infected = 3/10000 = .03%
Cases -
56.2M
Population US
329 million.
Infected - 0.17
4 Jan 2022 5:43 pm
Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2022, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Cases -
56.2M
Population US
329 million.
Infected - 0.17
I had a feeling that you would post something that is completely unrelated you retard. Read Cannon's OP. The math is directly related to his OP nd his circumstance. Not 350 million people you dumb mother ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 5:49 pm
Your numbers are wrong, braying imbecile.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I had a feeling that you would post something that is completely unrelated you retard. Read Cannon's OP. The math is directly related to his OP nd his circumstance. Not 350 million people you dumb mother ****.
4 Jan 2022 5:52 pm
No *******, they aren't. I don't ever expect you to figure it put. So **** off.
And stop deflecting. If you are going to try and challenge it then read the **** OP so you can figure out what my numbers relate to. They aren't meant for the whole God damn population you stupid asshole.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 5:59 pm
CPs numbers are also ****.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑ No *******, they aren't. I don't ever expect you to figure it put. So **** off.
And stop deflecting. If you are going to try and challenge it then read the **** OP so you can figure out what my numbers relate to. They aren't meant for the whole God damn population you stupid asshole.
You two are morons.
4 Jan 2022 6:00 pm
Oh look. Veghead acting like he knows his ****. Big surprise.
**** off moron.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Jan 2022 6:02 pm
I've been showing you.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh look. Veghead acting like he knows his ****. Big surprise.
**** off moron.
There's another glaring error.
Being a moron, you can't see it.
Who is online
In total there are 5725 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 5708 guests
Bots: Reeder, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, okhttp, Applebot, proximic, Baiduspider, CriteoBot, curl/7, bingbot