Cannon is talking about real doctors, like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and Dr. Brian Tyson. Cannon cured himself at home through their advice and protocols. He reported it in this forum day by day.Liberalsarescum » 03 Jan 2022, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ O so the pin head who gave me shat about taking my doctors advise now agrees with me .
No next booster pin head I have had 3 shots. What is a cock vault ? Im not gay so Im not familiar with *** terms like you are.
yes if your pin head lies about beating covid in 48 to 60 hours sounds real believable especially when you dont actually seem to know how long it took.
Your about as believable as joe biden claiming he will cure cancer and unite the nation.
Really you got your advice from a doctor . How interesting .What did he tell you to do?And what's his name ?
Did he have feathers in his hair and a skirt made of palms and a bone in his nose ?
Or did he have a magic wand ?
https://www.thecentersquare.com/indiana ... 25e2c.htmlfreeman » 03 Jan 2022, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Cannon is talking about real doctors, like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and Dr. Brian Tyson. Cannon cured himself at home through their advice and protocols. He reported it in this forum day by day.
He didn't want to be a victim of the reprobate allopathic doctor groups in Big Pharma's Illness Industry, that are responsible for the completely unnecessary deaths of 750,000 Americans through their medical malpractice by way of Doctor Death Fauci's NIH's "standard of care".
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals
Here's an example of a real doctor that treated 7,000 elderly and high-risk patients with 0 deaths or hospitalizations of those that showed up within 7 days of symptoms, and overall only a few deaths and hospitalizations.
https://youtu.be/5vLuEook3VM
Yes, right after I posted to you, a friend phoned me with that information!freeman » 03 Jan 2022, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Hi Cannon, I posted that article within the last hour!
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=63475
TLDR, lab rat. Go get your next jab, dumb ***. I decline your offer of oral gratification.Liberalsarescum » 03 Jan 2022, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ My my you know a lot about gay sex acts with black men. Is it a subject close to your heart and soul ? Or perhaps your in the early planing stages for your first corn hole match. Good luck with which ever your up to .
So you can smell your self again. That must be one foul obnoxious odor. Hey not being able to smell could of been great for your sex life. That way when your licking you know what not being able to smell could be a good thing.
Sorry I have to disagree with you about you not having any symptoms.
Its obvious your full of shat and are a human bull shat machine.
Plus add in dick head and butt hole and you have normal symptoms and probably will forever .
You could be a Biden advisor for covid.
Or a foot servant for Obama and his wife.
Never heard of it but I bookmarked it to peruse some time.Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2022, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, right after I posted to you, a friend phoned me with that information!
You frequenting nonewnormal.win?
Huey » 31 Dec 2021, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ And you spent no time with her today. Is she aware, stalker, of you perv on girls her age?
maybe, but @Blackvegetable ’s post show he also perves on young girls.
WE'VE KNOWN THE ELDERLY AND THOSE WITH COMMORBIDITIES ARE MOST AT RISK.Cannonpointer » 31 Dec 2021, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ This is PG thread and I'll not brook trolling - but I'm leaving it wide open in case those with other views wish to weight in PERTINENTLY.
This is MY math - I stand ready to be corrected if anyone finds an error.
1. 20% of all medicines approved by the FDA are subsequently withdrawn from the market - the majority, for safety concerns. Many of these end up in late night television commercials, soliciting clients for class action law suits: "Did you, or someone you love, take XYZ medication and have your butt hole prolapse or your liver sprout warts or your throat fall out? Call Dewey, Cheatum and Howe - you may be entitle to relief..."
2. The odds of a medication being withdrawn for health and safety reasons go up, when regulatory hurdles are waived to facilitate hasty deployment.
3. My odds of dying from Covid are placed at 3 in 10 thousand, just for being an American. If you get more granular, my odds go up a bit for being over 45, but down a bit for having an extremely good immune system. Not being chronically D-deficient lowers my odds significantly, as, IMO, does my command of the Ivermectin Protocol.
So I was faced with rolling the dice on a 20% chance of an adverse outcome from the jab - and that number is conservative, since the jab was passed in haste through the waiver of ordinary hurdles. Or I could buck the tiger's odds on a disease that had a 3 in 10k chance of ending me.
I felt lucky. I rolled the dice based on my own optimism and confidence in my ability to fight back against a virus through intelligent supplementation and intelligent course of treatment. In the end, I got my secret, perverse wish, and was blessed with a case of Covid19. It hit harder than I thought it would - I was impressed. But it had no staying power against the Ivermectin regime and my other supplement strategies. I got my first symptoms on Monday, and today, I am well. And - as I shall soon prove, - I have antibodies which will be a blessing to my society, Now that I have these antibodies, I intend to resume giving plasma, so that I can help to spread herd immunity to my countrymen.
Are there any obvious flaws in my math or logic, dear reader?
I am also type O negative. Did not know that was a plus?righteous » 03 Jan 2022, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ WE'VE KNOWN THE ELDERLY AND THOSE WITH COMMORBIDITIES ARE MOST AT RISK.
THE DECISION YOU'VE MADE WAS A WISE ONE. I'VE ALSO ABSTAINED FROM THE POISON DART, AND HAVE NEVER BEEN SICK.
I ALSO BELIEVE HAVING A HEALTHY IMMUNE SYSTEM AND USING THE RIGHT SUPPLEMENTS, HAVING O TYPE BLOOD HELPS,
IS KEY.
MY BROTHER WAS GIVEN MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES, STARTING FEELING BETTER THE NEXT DAY.
THE TWO NEW NON- MRNA VACCINES ARE PROMISING BUT LOOKS AS THOUGH FAUCI IS DOING EVERYTHING TO STOP IT'S APPROVAL.
TLDR, lab rat. Go get another injection.Liberalsarescum » 03 Jan 2022, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Now that's funny. We all know that a coward like you has no penis or balls therefore there could not have been an offer . With nothing but your festering mind decaying from the age of 30 to till now .
A mind that has become warped from years of substance abuse and sexual abuse at your own hands while you were driving you Vespa to your job . Your job where you were the first person to speak the immortal words do you want fries with that for 35 years.
Then fired when you were caught making your version of special sauce while cleaning the head in the mens room looking over the stall.
Poor thing I pity you, the life you have suffered through. I forgive you for your bull shat and ignorance and complete stupidity.
You answered the same post twice - always a giveaway of severe butthurt.Liberalsarescum » 03 Jan 2022, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ what jab pin head ?
Speaking of jabs have you been jabbed you yet ? Wait wait I don't want to know .
Even a butt hole like you needs to keep some self respect to keep his hugely inflated ego up and running.
I can not deny that , even to such a poor representative of the species.
Ii thought so.
It looks like you are spot on, but there is a little more math that needs to be done for no other reason than to prove it mathematically. I believe (though I may be wrong) that to find the real probabilities, there are 4 cases:
So I was faced with rolling the dice on a 20% chance of an adverse outcome from the jab - and that number is conservative, since the jab was passed in haste through the waiver of ordinary hurdles. Or I could buck the tiger's odds on a disease that had a 3 in 10k chance of ending me.
Are there any obvious flaws in my math or logic, dear reader?
Holy crap.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It looks like you are spot on, but there is a little more math that needs to be done for no other reason than to prove it mathematically. I believe (though I may be wrong) that to find the real probabilities, there are 4 cases:Probabilities:
- vaccine with adverse conditions without infection
- Vaccine with adverse conditions with infection
- vaccine without adverse conditions with infection
- Vaccine without adverse conditions without infection
Case 1) .2 x .9997 = 19.994%
- Vaccine with adverse conditions = .2
- Vaccine without adverse conditions = .8
- Infected = 3/10000 = .03%
- Not infected = 99.97%
Case 2) .2 x .0003 = .006%
Case 3) .8 x .03 = 2.4%
Case 4) .8 x .9997 = 79.98%
Case 4 has the highest probability followed by Case 1. However, these are only the probabilities with the vaccine. I would say that case 2 is the most applicable to your argument. Very small probability, so you are spot on.
I didn't.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol. I am waiting for Veghead to chime in to ask 500 questions and make as many demands as possible about it while he pretends to understand any of it.
![]()
yep.. I'll admit when I don't know something.. and look for someone who does.Vegas » 04 Jan 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL. You aren't a lying narcissist like he is. You know how they are. They pretend to know everything. He once told @Huey that he could drive an 18 wheeler because he drove a manual car through the Rockies once.![]()
It's your *** you're living in, rent free.
