Liberal Forum

ScottMon » 10 Jan 2022, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2022, 4:02 pm

Covid is unique in the sense that It will keep latching on to hosts because the hosts don't retain the anti-bodies for more than 3-6 months.

Sounds like only a retard would take multiple experimental vaccines that don't work - CAN'T work, according to you.

Are you retarded?

Buffalo » 11 Jan 2022, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 8:59 am

IVERMECTIN can prevent one from getting the communist chinese bioweapon and is also an effective treatment for the **** when given early.

A tad sick Tuesday, truck-wrecked and tested positive and started the ivermectin regime on wednesday, worked out on friday. 
 

Crazytrain » 11 Jan 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 9:05 am

No I work around people that are infected everyday. I wear a mask and social distance and wash my hands and I have never gotten the virus and I'm vaxxed. Something is working.

You will get the virus, *******. Everyone will. 
 

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 10:17 am

Its clear that you want the vaccines to fail.  You need the vaccines to be dangerous.  You Will go out of your way to feed your personal cognitive bias.

Just keep getting your jabs and studying your dog eared copy of free market for dummies, pook. 
 

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 10:48 am

I know responding to you is a mistake.  Pandemics are a numbers game.  You try to save as many as you can.  I know for a fact that scientists and technicians worked long hours and skipped time with family to work on these vaccines.  

So did the front line doctors who developed TREATMENTS that didn't make pig pharma billions, pookie. 
 

dillydang » 11 Jan 2022, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 1:35 pm

No.

At nearly 70% vaccinated, that's about 200 million people. Any medical treatment, including drugs, radiation, and even vaccines, carries a non-zero risk. So does driving, biking and being a pedestrian. We all have to make the risk calculations for ourselves. I chose vaccination and boosting because the risk of serious disease or hospitalization greatly outweighed the risk of an adverse reaction to the vaccine. Bad reactions are tragic for those affected. So are injuries and death from auto collisions. We should not minimize the emotional trauma involved. In the end, we all make our choices and live with the consequences.

Just be sure to keep getting your boosters. Your nation is relying on your good judgment - especially those with investments in pig pharma. 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 2:13 pm

A tad sick Tuesday, truck-wrecked and tested positive and started the ivermectin regime on wednesday, worked out on friday.

Take it twice a month as a prophylaxis.  

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 10:17 am

Its clear that you want the vaccines to fail.  You need the vaccines to be dangerous.  You Will go out of your way to feed your personal cognitive bias.

I see. So you don't count a vaxx sinking from 88% to 3% effective as being a fail.
Or such poor performance against the first variant that came along to challenge them.
Pfizer-BioNTech effectiveness down to 42% Moderna down to 76%

Let alone the abysmal 30-40% effectiveness against omicron.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/how ... st-omicron

You see my friend, nobody has to wish for vaccine failure when it has been evident for months. Particularly when we consider the lies we are fed by government and the vaccine stakeholders - like the media and politicians.

S please enlighten us, at what point should that vaccinee consider his "protection" is worthless since a chart of vaccine waning would look like a half-life chart (but at the rate of about 40% per month according to an Israeli study).
Or is your measure success the likely hundreds of thousands of non-"vaccine" deaths and the millions of adverse reactions including permanent permanent disability?

Since you were entered into the Pharmaco-Vigilance Tracking System operated by Google and Oracle, how many times have you been contacted by the government or the vaccine maker, to see how you are doing? At 3 months? At 6 months?
Gee, I think we likely already know the answer. Why do you suppose that is, particularly in light of Pfizer making a request to hide trial data for the next 55 years?
Could Pfizer's vaccine's effectiveness be as low as 19% to 29%?
 
 

Crazytrain » 11 Jan 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 9:05 am

No I work around people that are infected everyday. I wear a mask and social distance and wash my hands and I have never gotten the virus and I'm vaxxed. Something is working.

If you were sick between 2002 and 2004 you may have picked up antibody resistance with T-cell memory from SARS-CoV1.
 

freeman » 11 Jan 2022, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 2:51 pm

I see. So you don't count a vaxx sinking from 88% to 3% effective as being a fail.
Or such poor performance against the first variant that came along to challenge them.
Pfizer-BioNTech effectiveness down to 42% Moderna down to 76%

 

According to your own link, Its actually 42%New Study: Pfizer Vaccine 42% Effective Against COVID-19, Rise in Delta Variant
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2022, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 2:19 pm

So did the front line doctors who developed TREATMENTS that didn't make pig pharma billions, pookie.

Not sure what your point is here. 

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 3:31 pm

Not sure what your point is here. 

excellerating mutating viruses always changes the strains exponentially faster only killing 50% at a time. What is the half life ratio of current population?

16 people become great great grandparents 3 generations after adding the children that became 8 great grandparents. *great grandparents parenting 4 grandparents, that grew up reproducing the original 16's great great grandchildren.

cycles done in plain sight leave total population of ever changing people added forward until great great grandchild are never added again.. biology's kinetic judgement day.

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 3:29 pm

According to your own link, Its actually 42%New Study: Pfizer Vaccine 42% Effective Against COVID-19, Rise in Delta Variant

If you are referring to the 88% to 3% over 6 months that was a study on J&J from back in October.
You see I'm not wanting the non-vaxxes to fail, I've been watching them fail, more every month. I feel sorry for all those that got duped - and particularly those that got forced into getting them to keep their jobs.
You repeated the link percentages but those were against Delta and before the vaxx wanes. Only 30-40% effective against Omicron. Bear in mind that's before the vaxxes begin to wane.

Additionally, either the abysmal lack of effectiveness or the rapid waning, either one alone, would have precluded any of these vaccines from ever being given EUA much less approval as vaccines, according to FDA standards.
I don't understand why EUA hasn't been pulled. But then they were only allowed emergency use authorization based on a giant preposterous lie to begin with.
The BIG LIE that "there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives"

But does any of that strike you as success? Why do you suppose they only selected younger people with no comorbidities for the trials? They knew they were running a con. That's obviously why Pfizer wants to hide data for 55 years.

Vaccine waning is not linear. Below is an example of a half-life chart. An Israeli study concluded vaccines wane at a 40% per month rate. So since the chart below is a 50% rate, the chart would look the same except be slightly more elongated from side to side. Since Pfizer and Moderna start out at 30-40% effective against Omicron, at what point in the reduction in efficacy would you feel the need to get a booster? Since within 2 months it would be way less than 20% effective?
(actually I think it's almost exactly what a J&J chart would look like)
Or better put, at what point would you feel stupid getting a booster, particularly if you had early treatment meds on hand?
Particularly considering your increased odds of heart failure, cancer or autoimmune diseases and other life threatening and taking diseases in the future.



 
 

freeman » 11 Jan 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 3:45 pm

If you are referring to the 88% to 3% over 6 months that was a study on J&J from back in October.
You see I'm not wanting the non-vaxxes to fail, I've been watching them fail, more every month. I feel sorry for all those that got duped - and particularly those that got forced into getting them to keep their jobs.
You repeated the link percentages but those were against Delta and before the vaxx wanes. Only 30-40% effective against Omicron. Bear in mind that's before the vaxxes begin to wane.



 

You want to flummox folks with a wall of text to disguise that you don't know what you're talking about  
 

ScottMon » 10 Jan 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2022, 6:28 pm

Do you know what the average life expectancy was before vaccines came in use?

That's about the stupidest question I've seen asked in this forum. Smallpox and polio vaccines are "sterilizing" or "perfect" vaccines. One jab and one receives immunity for life.
The novel, leaky, unapproved, experimental, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, innate immune response reprogramming, biological agents neither prevent one from becoming infected by or transmitting COVID. Turned vaccinees into asymptomatic Typhoid Mary carriers and spreaders of COVID-19. In other words Granny killers. And the adverse consequences to immune systems resulting in an increase in cancer and the coming heart failures are only just beginning and will be felt for years. Yet they're not even having difficulty selling morons that lack a capacity for critical thought on boosters.
mRNA vaxx - functional reprogramming of innate immune responses- favoring cancer

This generation of leaky, variant-creating, dangerous, non-vaccines have been responsible for keeping the endemic phase of this virus going, right from vaccine rollout on.
https://youtu.be/xSrc_s2Gqfw

 
 

freeman » 11 Jan 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 5:24 pm

That's about the stupidest question I've seen asked in this forum. Smallpox and polio vaccines are "sterilizing" or "perfect" vaccines. One jab and one's got immunity for life.
The novel, leaky, unapproved, experimental, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, innate immune response reprogramming, biological agents neither prevent one from becoming infected by or transmitting COVID. Turned vaccinees into asymptomatic Typhoid Mary carriers and spreaders of COVID-19. In other words Granny killers
This generation of leaky, variant-creating, dangerous, non-vaccines have been responsible for keeping the endemic phase of this virus going, right from vaccine rollout.

 

Its easy to say that but the numbers I see don't match yours.  

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 5:24 pm

You want to flummox folks with a wall of text to disguise that you don't know what you're talking about

I don't doubt my posts are often difficult for the functionally illiterate. But then I don't respond to your posts for your benefit as I know that would be futile. I post in here for onlookers from both inside and outside the forum that may actually be seeking truth.
But then usually empty criticism us usually the way respondents run and hide from the truth or my questions.
So how many phone calls have you received in vaccine followup from the government or vaxx makers?

 
 

freeman » 11 Jan 2022, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 5:32 pm

I don't doubt my posts are often difficult for the functionally illiterate. But then I don't respond to your posts for your benefit as I know that would be futile. I post in here for onlookers from both inside and outside the forum that may actually be seeking truth.
Good luck with that.  Because anyone with a brain can smell your **** a mile away.  

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 3:31 pm

Not sure what your point is here.

Why am I not surprised?
 

ScottMon » 11 Jan 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2022, 5:24 pm

You want to flummox folks with a wall of text to disguise that you don't know what you're talking about

Easily flummoxed. ^