Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
Liberals Only Political Chat Room
‹
On Being Civil to Incivility
On Being Civil to Incivility
By B.See
14 Jan 2022 6:29 am in Liberals Only Political Chat Room
25 Aug 2022 5:49 am
LMFAOTulum » 25 Aug 2022, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ I TOLD YOU ONCE AND I WILL TELL YOU AGAIN.
YOU PUT YOUR DICK WITHIN 10 FEET OF ME AND I PUT YOU TO SLEEP FOREVER
JUST LIKE A RABID ANIMAL
DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
YOU ARE A MAGGOT!
Sucking up after my threads, trolling, following me around like a little btch, even CREATED a thread in which you FANTASIZE about "you vs. me"... as IF......
YOU WANT IT BAAAAAAD.
25 Aug 2022 5:58 am
YOU KEEP ASKING FOR IT, SO I'M DELIVERING, BTCH.
25 Aug 2022 6:18 am
Dream on, pathetic little btch. And no, you can't suck my dick, no matter HOW MUCH ATTENTION your sorry *** craves.
25 Aug 2022 1:18 pm
You sure like to talk about sucking dog dick.
25 Aug 2022 4:50 pm
Tulum » 25 Aug 2022, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ GO SUCK SOME MORE DOG PENIS YOU MONKEY POX AIDS INFESTED ***!
I bet the neighborhood dogs line up outside your front door puppy molester!
26 Aug 2022 12:50 am
26 Aug 2022 8:57 am
Truly one sick puppy! Perversion is all you talk about.
26 Aug 2022 10:09 am
I have absolutely no idea who he is, Cyndi ... first I've heard of him was his appearing in this thread... have NO idea why.
However I've revamped this thread in NHB, the reasons why are stated in the o.p. along with these rules of engagement (as for all my p.g. threads):
"PG THREAD RULES: applies to this thread as all my PG enabled threads: rational discussions, points counter points, rebuttals and responses are welcome, but NOT personal insults, name calling, fabricating 'direct' quotes, hate speech, drive by **** posting, trolling, and senseless content. Those who've habitually engaged in such have already been uninvited, while some have NOT been uninvited...yet."
But some revelations in the comments of one or two who were banned prompts me to ask you a question about how those threads work. I ask you seeing as how YOU were the first to tell me of peanut gallery, and I trust you'll give me a truthful response.
Are people banned from those threads unable to see ANYTHING in them? I've always believed they could read the threads but not POST in them.
26 Aug 2022 10:26 am
LOL Murdock is a filthy piggy from another forum. I'm trolling him too.B.See » 26 Aug 2022, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ I have absolutely no idea who he is, Cyndi ... first I've heard of him was his appearing in this thread... have NO idea why.
However I've revamped this thread in NHB, the reasons why are stated in the o.p. along with these rules of engagement (as for all my p.g. threads):
"PG THREAD RULES: applies to this thread as all my PG enabled threads: rational discussions, points counter points, rebuttals and responses are welcome, but NOT personal insults, name calling, fabricating 'direct' quotes, hate speech, drive by **** posting, trolling, and senseless content. Those who've habitually engaged in such have already been uninvited, while some have NOT been uninvited...yet."
But some revelations in the comments of one or two who were banned prompts me to ask you a question about how those threads work. I ask you seeing as how YOU were the first to tell me of peanut gallery, and I trust you'll give me a truthful response.
Are people banned from those threads unable to see ANYTHING in them? I've always believed they could read the threads but not POST in them.
i live in murdocks head. 9 tribute threads on me... and dozens of stoopid photoshops. 
26 Aug 2022 10:28 am
Piggy piggy piggy... You are!
26 Aug 2022 10:30 am
Oh... okay... LOL. As if we don't have ENOUGH trolls of our OWN.sootedupCyndi » 26 Aug 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ LOL Murdock is a filthy piggy from another forum. I'm trolling him too.
Back to that question I asked. When people get banned from pg threads, are they no longer able to read of see them??
I guess that would explain why some seem not to know what they did, because I usually say why in the thread.
26 Aug 2022 10:33 am
Actually they can. All a person has to do is use a different browser and not sign in.B.See » 26 Aug 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Oh... okay... LOL. As if we don't have ENOUGH trolls of our OWN.
Back to that question I asked. When people get banned from pg threads, are they no longer able to read of see them??
I guess that would explain why some seem not to know what they did, because I usually say why in the thread.
And they can read the thread. Other then that a big Ronjul face pops up and it says YOUR banned.
26 Aug 2022 10:37 am
Okay. I see.sootedupCyndi » 26 Aug 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ Actually they can. All a person has to do is use a different browser and not sign in.
And they can read the thread. Other then that a big Ronjul face pops up and it says YOUR banned.
So for some, it might actually be an incentive, to jump into the thread and deliberately do what they know would get them banned, just to get banned, be rendered unable to see information they'd reject ANYWAY, then cry about being banned.
What a racket, eh?
26 Aug 2022 10:38 am
i Like to get banned. Its funny.B.See » 26 Aug 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Okay. I see.
So for some, it might actually be an incentive, to jump into the thread and deliberately do what they know would get them banned, just to get banned, be rendered unable to see information they'd reject ANYWAY, then cry about being banned.
What a racket, eh?
26 Aug 2022 11:02 am
Maybe so, Cyndi. But truth is you aren't banned from all my pg enabled threads. And that's because, on occasion, you have responded to SOME of my posts by at least acknowledging the points I've made.
and also because, though you support the hate-based, retrogressive agenda of the MAGA right, and even take PART in their malevolent minded banter, I see you too, as a victim of their misogynistic agenda, in particular with regard to abortion rights, equal pay for women, and the like.
Besides, you don't engage in the repetitive trolling, nonsense posts, lies, deceptions, mischaracterizations, and personal attacks.
So, thanks for responding.
21 Sep 2022 12:00 am
21 Sep 2022 10:51 am
sootedupCyndi » 24 Aug 2022, 2:57 am » wrote: ↑ That murdock is that creepy miketx.
I caught him. and his sok. took one day. LOL
Cynderfella lies again.
21 Sep 2022 10:52 am
I see you know cynderfella well!B.See » 26 Aug 2022, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe so, Cyndi. But truth is you aren't banned from all my pg enabled threads. And that's because, on occasion, you have responded to SOME of my posts by at least acknowledging the points I've made.
and also because, though you support the hate-based, retrogressive agenda of the MAGA right, and even take PART in their malevolent minded banter, I see you too, as a victim of their misogynistic agenda, in particular with regard to abortion rights, equal pay for women, and the like.
Besides, you don't engage in the repetitive trolling, nonsense posts, lies, deceptions, mischaracterizations, and personal attacks.
So, thanks for responding.
21 Sep 2022 10:54 am
Lots of people here can see through your bs. Why do you pretend you're a woman?
30 Sep 2022 6:27 am
THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE - THE FASCIST CULT OF THE MAGAS:
Judge goes off on GOP leaders during Jan. 6 trial for being afraid to stand up to Trump - Raw Story
... one of the key judges overseeing the trials of January 6 defendants took aim at Republican leaders who have helped encourage ... Donald Trump's lies about the election, out of political expediency.
"U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson said ...Trump had turned his lies about the election into a litmus test for Republican candidates and that 'high-ranking members of Congress and state officials' are 'so afraid of losing their power' that they won’t contradict him."
"That fealty, she said, comes even as law enforcement and judges involved in cases related to the former president are facing unprecedented threats of violence."
MEANWHILE A CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST WEIGHS IN:
'White grievance and straight-up racism' survey speaks volumes about MAGA attitudes: conservative - Alternet.org
ALSO:
Bonkers study: Millions of MAGAS Would Use Force To Restore Trump To The OCCUPANCY.
Judge goes off on GOP leaders during Jan. 6 trial for being afraid to stand up to Trump - Raw Story
... one of the key judges overseeing the trials of January 6 defendants took aim at Republican leaders who have helped encourage ... Donald Trump's lies about the election, out of political expediency.
"U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson said ...Trump had turned his lies about the election into a litmus test for Republican candidates and that 'high-ranking members of Congress and state officials' are 'so afraid of losing their power' that they won’t contradict him."
"That fealty, she said, comes even as law enforcement and judges involved in cases related to the former president are facing unprecedented threats of violence."
MEANWHILE A CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST WEIGHS IN:
'White grievance and straight-up racism' survey speaks volumes about MAGA attitudes: conservative - Alternet.org
ALSO:
Bonkers study: Millions of MAGAS Would Use Force To Restore Trump To The OCCUPANCY.
Who is online
In total there are 565 users online :: 24 registered, 18 bots, and 523 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Two If By Tea, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, Squatchman, righteous, Buffalo, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, impartialobserver, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, *Beekeeper, jerra b, Skans, murdock, PhiloBeddo, Sumela, Cedar, Deezer Shoove, Harper Lee, nefarious101, *Huey
Bots: YandexBot, Mojeek, YisouSpider, DuckDuckBot, coccocbot, TTD-Content, LCC, Applebot, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, semantic-visions.com, ADmantX, curl/7, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, bingbot