Liberal Forum

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:17 pm

No  need for a rule.  See what happens.  Use this train wreck of a thread as a template.

Also, you if you want any questions answered concerning this:

You will have to not only

Are these your words?
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm

Tribute thread.

As to how he got his rep points, posting earns them. Being responded to earns them. Getting upvotes aerns them.

Is that how it works. I didn't know that. but thank you for helping me figure out how to copy a picture url. I had been working on that for years.  I just never knew what thing to click!  
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:21 pm

Are these your words?

If my name is on the post you took it from then, yes those are part of my words. "You will have to not only....." are very generic and could belong to anyone. 

As I told you early on you post what you want, when you want, and how you want.  BUT, I am not obligated to participate, answer questions or demands, or contribute in any way! 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm

We will cover your risible interpretation of the astroturf later.

Why do you persist in not answering the first question?

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm

If my name is on the post you took it from then, yes those are part of my words. "You will have to not only....." are very generic and could belong to anyone. 

As I told you early on you post what you want, when you want, and how you want.  BUT, I am not obligated to participate, answer questions or demands, or contribute in any way! 
 

"You will have to not only....." are very generic and could belong to anyone. 

No...that demandy **** is quite recognizable as the yapping of a certain sniveling little coward.

BUT, I am not obligated to participate, answer questions or demands, or contribute in any way! 

Under what rule?

Just be sure to remember that you had your *** kicked here.

Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm

Tribute thread.

As to how he got his rep points, posting earns them. Being responded to earns them. Getting upvotes earns them.
 
 

unless shunned. ha ha ha ha

my sarcasm came out reading this post and being the one most like ignoring because no one sided intellect is safe from instinctive awareness to how living actually works reproductively in plain sight.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm

No...that demandy **** is quite recognizable as the yapping of a certain sniveling little coward.

Under what rule?

Just be sure to remember that you had your *** kicked here.

1.  Not a demand.  Stop inventing issues.  You do what you want.

2.  Under the same rule that applies to you posting what you want, when you want and how you want.  I am not obligated to participate.

3.  LMAO!  There is no context in which you could kick my ***. Oh, maybe one.  You can beat me at skiing, but millions can do that. Nothing special there. 
 
 
 

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:32 pm

1.  Not a demand.  Stop inventing issues.  You do what you want.

2.  Under the same rule that applies to you posting what you want, when you want and how you want.  I am not obligated to participate.

3.  LMAO!  There is no context in which you could kick my ***. Oh, maybe one.  You can beat me at skiing, but millions can do that. Nothing special there.

1. I can read, Dwarf. No need to reinterpret.

2. Post the **** rule.

3. Post the subject of Youngkin's first EO..

(1xth time)
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:32 pm

1.  Not a demand.  Stop inventing issues.  You do what you want.

2.  Under the same rule that applies to you posting what you want, when you want and how you want.  I am not obligated to participate.

3.  LMAO!  There is no context in which you could kick my ***. Oh, maybe one.  You can beat me at skiing, but millions can do that. Nothing special there.

1. I can read, Dwarf. No need to reinterpret.

2. Post the **** rule.

3. Post the subject of Youngkin's first EO..

(1xth time)
 

 

1.  As the NFL topic shows your reading skills are iffy.

2. There is no rule.  You are always whining about rules. 

3.  I guess your google is broke.  I am under no obligation to do your work for you on this thread, or any other.  

Remember, Mary, we can end these discussions much faster if you got to YOUR point right away. 

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm

1.  As the NFL topic shows your reading skills are iffy.

2. There is no rule.  You are always whining about rules. 

3.  I guess your google is broke.  I am under no obligation to do your work for you on this thread, or any other.  

Remember, Mary, we can end these discussions much faster if you got to YOUR point right away.

1. Retelling
2. Then what compels  me to do the things you say I must? (DMA)
3. Still can't bring yourself to do it, "winnah"... :rofl:  

You realize that you STILL haven't answered the question informing the title....


**** brick
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:53 pm

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm

1.  As the NFL topic shows your reading skills are iffy.

2. There is no rule.  You are always whining about rules. 

3.  I guess your google is broke.  I am under no obligation to do your work for you on this thread, or any other.  

Remember, Mary, we can end these discussions much faster if you got to YOUR point right away.

1. Retelling
2. Then what compels  me to do the things you say I must? (DMA)
3. Still can't bring yourself to do it, "winnah"...  

You realize that you STILL haven't answered the question informing the title....


**** brick
 

 

1.  Matter of record.  Want to go back to that thread?  

2.  You are not compelled to do anything.  You ar creating an issue again. 

3.  There is nothing to do.  This is your thread.  If there is something you wish to discuss, as I told you earlier, it is all you.  I told you I was not participating.  If you have a point to make, you go ahead and make it.      

Huey » 23 Jan 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2022, 10:06 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jan 2022, 10:04 am

Is it on, Dwarf?

Do whatever you want.  If it entails me answering questions and doing your work, I’ll just sit back, read the thread, and laugh.

Tnis is all you, Mary.

 

@Blackvegetable   for your failing memory. 

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:56 pm

1.  Matter of record.  Want to go back to that thread?  

2.  You are not compelled to do anything.  You ar creating an issue again. 

3.  There is nothing to do.  This is your thread.  If there is something you wish to discuss, as I told you earlier, it is all you.  I told you I was not participating.  If you have a point to make, you go ahead and make it.    

Post the thread title, "winnah"...

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 3:06 pm

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:56 pm

1.  Matter of record.  Want to go back to that thread?  

2.  You are not compelled to do anything.  You ar creating an issue again. 

3.  There is nothing to do.  This is your thread.  If there is something you wish to discuss, as I told you earlier, it is all you.  I told you I was not participating.  If you have a point to make, you go ahead and make it.    

Post the thread title, "winnah"...

 

 

What compels me to do so?  LMAO!  Is your keyboard broke?  

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm

@Blackvegetable   for your failing memory.

Your post facto justifications are of no interest whatsoever.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 3:08 pm

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm

@Blackvegetable   for your failing memory.

Your post facto justifications are of no interest whatsoever.

 
 

 

And this thread, as I told you, is of no interest whatsoever.  Waiting on the second one.....

This oughta be good.

 

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 3:07 pm

What compels me to do so?  LMAO!  Is your keyboard broke?

You may not appreciate the fact that doubling up on your running only reinforces the lesson of the thread title you can't bring yourself to post.

The problem isn't that I oblige you to jump into boxes of your own making, it's that you leave so many of them littered about the place....
 

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 3:09 pm

And this thread, as I told you, is of no interest whatsoever.  Waiting on the second one.....

This oughta be good.

I can appreciate why you would have little interest in your own humiliation.

But there is an important lesson here, Usefool..

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 3:10 pm

I can appreciate why you would have little interest in your own humiliation.

But there is an important lesson here, Usefool..

Haven't seen anything to be humiliated about.  I see lots of demands and questions concerning a topic I was not discussing with you.  And also a correction on what you claimed I said and the supporting source that backed me up.

This is all you, Richard.  

Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jan 2022, 3:12 pm

Haven't seen anything to be humiliated about.  I see lots of demands and questions concerning a topic I was not discussing with you.  And also a correction on what you claimed I said and the supporting source that backed me up.

This is all you, Richard.

Post the subject of Youngkin's first EO...

:rofl:  

Keep toeing that rake, Sheilagh...