Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the subject of Youngkin's first EO...
![]()
Keep toeing that rake, Sheilagh...
Huey » 23 Jan 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑Do whatever you want. If it entails me answering questions and doing your work, I’ll just sit back, read the thread, and laugh.
Tnis is all you, Mary.
It entailed nothing more than obliging you to demonstrate the truth of the OP you won't post.
You aren't.
Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑It entailed nothing more than obliging you to demonstrate the truth of the OP you won't post.
I'm pretty sure I'm well into the bonus round by now.
Perhaps the judges will invoke the Mercy Rule.
Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑You aren't.
Whether you answer, or cower under the porch pissing yourself, you lose.
You are up to 11 pages. Waiting for you to demonstrate it.Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2022, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Some may be familiar with Sheilagh's habit of proclaiming herself "undefeated in challenges".
Overlooking, for the nonce, the patent ridiculousness of such talk coming from a running little cunny, perhaps it is a matter of definition.
Let's test the theory.
Here is the deal.
I can demonstrate, with no more than one post, that @Huey is a Useful Idiot of the very first order.
Any takers?
he interprets, you translate into what you need for things to mean so your typecast superiority has meaning contextually even though just hope, faith, charity reality is all everyone accepts as as all there is to know because it was ancestral consensus so far.Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. I can read, Dwarf. No need to reinterpret.
2. Post the **** rule.
3. Post the subject of Youngkin's first EO..
(1xth time)
Dwarf,Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I was never interested in this OP. And to humiliate me you have to make your own case. I am not obligated to participate in that.
You aren't aren't even on the game stage yet, Richard, never mind the bonus round.
Again?
I am not reframing. Waiting on you to demonstrate whatever is on your mind. Where is that other thread? That will be good for a laugh!Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑Dwarf,Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I was never interested in this OP. And to humiliate me you have to make your own case. I am not obligated to participate in that.
You aren't aren't even on the game stage yet, Richard, never mind the bonus round.
Don't try to reframe.
Stay in your box.
Blackvegetable » 23 Jan 2022, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Some may be familiar with Sheilagh's habit of proclaiming herself "undefeated in challenges".
Overlooking, for the nonce, the patent ridiculousness of such talk coming from a running little cunny, perhaps it is a matter of definition.
Let's test the theory.
Here is the deal.
I can demonstrate, with no more than one post, that is a Useful Idiot of the very first order.
Any takers?
Exactly.Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ That says YOU will demonstrate it. I am just here for entertainment.
Now call posting your OP a reframe!
Under the porch, Coward.
How many times, on this thread, have I obliged you to run from the same question?Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not reframing. Waiting on you to demonstrate whatever is on your mind. Where is that other thread? That will be good for a laugh!
Sorry, this thread is all you. Want some popcorn?Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑Exactly.Huey » 24 Jan 2022, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ That says YOU will demonstrate it. I am just here for entertainment.
Now call posting your OP a reframe!
By putting you to rout....again.
That you are too **** dim to recognize it is predictable.
**** hilarious!Blackvegetable » 24 Jan 2022, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Under the porch, Coward.
Post the thread title.
QED.