ha ha haha. they went to jail convicted by plea bargaining to a lesser charge before a conviction was given. Psychological torture because to fight the original charge, the person charged will lose everything their family earned socially as typecast people to date in court of public opinion making of tomorrows today.ScottMon » 05 Feb 2022, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ The Russian intervention did happen and folks did go to jail over it.
Name one person who went to jail for collusion with Russia. People went to jail for obstructing a politically motivated witch hunt. A rape victim jailed for obstructing rape.ScottMon » 05 Feb 2022, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ The Russian intervention did happen and folks did go to jail over it.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/ ... ed-1290785Neo » 05 Feb 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ Name one person who went to jail for collusion with Russia. People went to jail for obstructing a politically motivated witch hunt. A rape victim jailed for obstructing rape.
She had connections to the Clinton's. Next?
She had connections to Trump's campaign and the NRA.
Do you have ANY **** clue?
Much more than that.
I don't watch much breathless progressive media, better for my blood pressure. Moving from outrage to outrage has to be bad for one's health. The Trump tower honeypot trap was arraigned by the dnc.
Byrne financed her campaign as a Putin puppet in the Russian parliament.Neo » 05 Feb 2022, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't watch much breathless progressive media, better for my blood pressure. Moving from outrage to outrage has to be bad for one's health. The Trump tower honeypot trap was arraigned by the dnc.
Didn't follow her story. At all.Blackvegetable » 05 Feb 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Byrne financed her campaign as a Putin puppet in the Russian parliament.
In other words right wing media is going to dump a bunch of **** weeks before the election so nobody can debunk the douche of misinformation.Vegas » 30 Jan 2022, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑ how many lefties here will laugh their *** off because you successfully destroyed the democratic process in our beloved country?
stay on intellectual topic and avoid discussing how corruption is never resolved intellectually.Squatchman » 06 Feb 2022, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑ Tick.
Tock.
One shred of evidence of election fraud yet?
Here's video evidence of a near 40,000 vote shift (20 subtracted and 20 added) that took place in a single moment, because the algorithms that were already built into the machine software by the democrats/Marxists, weren't able to overcome the extent of the landslide. How many moments can we suppose there were like this?Neo » 30 Jan 2022, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I have seen no evidence of widespread consequential voter fraud. Even on conservative outlets. Plenty of speculation but no concrete evidence.
What court is this going to be heard in?freeman » 06 Feb 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Here's video evidence of a near 40,000 vote shift (20 subtracted and 20 added) that took place in a single moment, because the algorithms that were already built into the machine software by the democrats/Marxists, weren't able to overcome the extent of the landslide. How many moments can we suppose there were like this?
Voting Machine Tyranny
Indeed. What does truth have to do with anything.Squatchman » 06 Feb 2022, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ What court is this going to be heard in?
Or better yet what court will laugh at it.
The truth is Trump's attorneys refused to assert voter fraud in court because they wanted to keep their law licenses.
Without investigation or discovery there can be no proof. The nature of the secret ballot makes it impossible to unscramble the egg after the ballot is separated from its sleeve. You won this one. Audits can only show the same results. Know that we will not have months long mail in election season again. Scream racism all ya won't, it will not happen again.slideman » 06 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The truth is Trump's attorneys refused to assert voter fraud in court because they wanted to keep their law licenses.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-crie ... 1605271267
https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-n ... nce-fraud/
Again you missed my point regarding truth - but replied as a lawyer - unless you believe the guy's video was a whole-cloth creation.slideman » 06 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The truth is Trump's attorneys refused to assert voter fraud in court because they wanted to keep their law licenses.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-crie ... 1605271267
https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-n ... nce-fraud/
The truth is Trump's attorneys refuse to assert voter fraud in court because they wanted to keep their law licensesfreeman » 06 Feb 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Again you missed my point regarding truth - but replied as a lawyer - unless you believe the guy's video was a whole-cloth creation.