And how many is that, fruity?slideman » 10 Feb 2022, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe are you are referring to Cannon pointers claims about our desire for population control.
Population control is voluntary based on a rational judgment concerning how many people the Earth can support.
Pullled it out of Misty's back.Phelix_Dacat » 10 Feb 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh wait. That's Chuck's knife. Where'd kfools get that?
Oh, snap!Phelix_Dacat » 10 Feb 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Rippy was giving Jinn ****, There was some back and forth for a while. Then kfools comes into the thread screeching that what Jinn said wasn't the deal. That Jinn was changing the deal. Said, "**** Jinn", though maybe it was "**** him". Then he ordered rippy to ban Jinn.
When/If OLF comes back online you can go look for the thread and ask them yourself. Sometime between yesterday and tomorrow. Keep telling yourself, "Not today. Maybe tomorrow." It will lessen the sting.
My stratagem worked. That is what matters.Phelix_Dacat » 10 Feb 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The **** talk seemed rather ordinary to me. I don't recall it at all. I have no idea what specific thing Jinn said that set off kfools, I couldn't tell you what it was if you offered me a stack of benji's. Maybe it was kfools time of the month. Maybe kfools didn't rub the lotion onto his skin and thus that 1 mil layer kfools has got damaged. I can't say.
I suspect CP told kfools that Jinn was hitting on commieslayinggirl and that was that ...
Don't get down on yourself, buckwheat.Cannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Saying yes to a generous offer is "groveling" only to dick suckers.
Know what I mean, Vern?
Xavier_Onassis » 10 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Uno nunca sabe por quien trabaje. (se nota aqui el uso del subjuntivo)
Phelix_Dacat » 10 Feb 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh wait. That's Chuck's knife. Where'd kfools get that?
Rippy was giving Jinn ****,
Because he wanted a slice of the cake.
There was some back and forth for a while. Then kfools comes into the thread screeching that what Jinn said wasn't the deal. That Jinn was changing the deal. Said, "**** Jinn", though maybe it was "**** him". Then he ordered rippy to ban Jinn.
True, but I did not "change" the deal, but kfools did not keep his word, assuming that I was too unskilled with computers to find out.
Which is true.
But rippy exposed the fraud when, in anger, he changed my posts and my profile, while I couldn't restore neither my posts nor my profile . . . and of course I couldn't change his..
And when I brought this up with kfools he went in berserk mode, assuming I would never donate again because of this fraud.
We both were "Senior Moderators" at the time, rippy and me, that is
And the deal with the fraud was that I'd have the same "powers" as rippy..
When/If OLF comes back online you can go look for the thread and ask them yourself. Sometime between yesterday and tomorrow. Keep telling yourself, "Not today. Maybe tomorrow." It will lessen the sting.
By the way . . . in the "Donations Thread" at .org, after I had him banned here, rippy literally stated that he he had visited this site under cover of a SOK and that he could create any amount of them . . . "just to piss off me and @Cannonpointer , calling him a whore and saying nothing about the $4,701 I had donated to kfools.
This ONE dollar I donated just before the site went off-air . . . just to tell him what's his worth is as a man !
If the thread is still there everyone who bothers can go and see the veracity of my statement above.
The **** talk seemed rather ordinary to me. I don't recall it at all. I have no idea what specific thing Jinn said that set off kfools, I couldn't tell you what it was if you offered me a stack of benji's. Maybe it was kfools time of the month. Maybe kfools didn't rub the lotion onto his skin and thus that 1 mil layer kfools has got damaged. I can't say.
Well, I just cut it down real thin for everyone.
I suspect CP told kfools that Jinn was hitting on commieslayinggirl and that was that ...
That too, yeah . . . although I'm not sure what my atrophied, wrinkled, shrivelled dick could have given her . . . other than one nice, abundant golden shower.
Can you teach me an easy way to reply to a post in segments?Cannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Pullled it out of Misty's back.
Oh, snap!
My stratagem worked. That is what matters.
So, the first thing is to hit "Disable word processor". It's just to the right bottom of the box, an inch below where this post ends.JinnMartini » 10 Feb 2022, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you teach me an easy way to reply to a post in segments?
I asked to @Misty but her way is too complicated for me.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=64217
Thanks anyway, @Misty
Let me check it out.Cannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ So, the first thing is to hit "Disable word processor". It's just to the right bottom of the box, an inch below where this post ends.
Then, copy the entire heading, from [bracket to bracket]. That's your header. Highlight it, and hit control x to capture and control v to put it back.
Then, put an end quote box at the end of the very first segment. An end quote box is the symbol / and the word quote, like so: /quote, between brackets. The brackets look like this [ and this ].This is what's called an embedded command. It doesn't show up in the text - it provides a function.
[/quote=Cannonpointer post_id=1945252 time=1644541162 user_id=841]
Respond to that segment, placing YOUR text immediately below the end quote box..
Like this ?
Now, hit control v again, to head the next snippet. That will put the header in again, above the text you are responding to.
Go to the end of the snippet, and put an end quote box there. Respond to that portion of the quote.
[/quote=Cannonpointer post_id=1945252 time=1644541162 user_id=841]
Like this ?
Hit control v again, and it will head the remaining snippet. there should already BE an end quote box there. Go outside of the end quote box and respond.
[/quote=Cannonpointer post_id=1945252 time=1644541162 user_id=841]
Like this ?
When you do a multi quote like that, instead of hitting submit, you should hit preview, to see if maybe you accidentally left the "e" off the word quote, or spelled it qote, or some such error. If that happened, it is no longer a function command - it is now text. And the program will make a mash of your post - which you can fix by finding and correcting the error - and be sure to undo any adjustments the program made to compensate for your error, such as adding another end quote box.
Is that easy to follow?
It sounds complex, but it's very easy once you have mastered it.
Phelix_Dacat » 10 Feb 2022, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ This might help @Jinn Martini
https://www.phpbb.com/community/help/bbcode
The problem is you are trying to learn to fly before you learn to crawl. Go to the part that talks aboutJinnMartini » 10 Feb 2022, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Thanks a lot man . . . but there's a lot of info there . . . which part explains what my intent is ?
Code: Select all
[quote] and [/quote]DoneCannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ So, the first thing is to hit "Disable word processor". It's just to the right bottom of the box, an inch below where this post ends.
Then, copy the entire heading, from [bracket to bracket]. That's your header. Highlight it, and hit control x to capture and control v to put it back.
Then, put an end quote box at the end of the very first segment. An end quote box is the symbol / and the word quote, like so: /quote, between brackets. The brackets look like this [ and this ].This is what's called an embedded command. It doesn't show up in the text - it provides a function.
Respond to that segment, placing YOUR text immediately below the end quote box..
DoneCannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Now, hit control v again, to head the next snippet. That will put the header in again, above the text you are responding to.
Go to the end of the snippet, and put an end quote box there. Respond to that portion of the quote.
DoneCannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Hit control v again, and it will head the remaining snippet. there should already BE an end quote box there. Go outside of the end quote box and respond.
Cannonpointer » 10 Feb 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ When you do a multi quote like that, instead of hitting submit, you should hit preview, to see if maybe you accidentally left the "e" off the word quote, or spelled it qote, or some such error. If that happened, it is no longer a function command - it is now text. And the program will make a mash of your post - which you can fix by finding and correcting the error - and be sure to undo any adjustments the program made to compensate for your error, such as adding another end quote box.
Is that easy to follow?
It sounds complex, but it's very easy once you have mastered it.
Phelix_Dacat » 10 Feb 2022, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ The problem is you are trying to learn to fly before you learn to crawl. Go to the part that talks aboutThis is all about tags. Every tag that starts with a [tag] will end with a [/tag] whether that tag is b for bold or i for italics or whatever.Code: Select all
[quote] and[/quote] Like this? [/quote] [quote=Phelix_Dacat post_id=1945361 time=1644544669 user_id=918]
Respond to this post, and when you see it in the Post Reply Box and click on Source. Look for beginning and end tags. It starts to make sense pretty quick.
You did great, BUT I suspect you missed a quote box. As a result, the entire post is quote within quote. And when I respond to it, consequently, EVERYTHING disappears.