Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
New Durham Filing: Clinton Campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia
New Durham Filing: Clinton Campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia
By golfboy
12 Feb 2022 6:14 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Feb 2022 5:41 am
We can be certain of one thing....neueregel » 14 Feb 2022, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑ We’ll see if Mueller’s house of cards stand once Durham gets done with him. Mueller investigates for years, spends millions of dollars and can’t uncover the Clinton campaign’ role in spying on the Trump
campaign?
Im sure WaPo is writing about it as we speak.
If it doesn't, your faith will remain unshaken.
15 Feb 2022 5:43 am
Where do you go to become so wise, Ruby?neueregel » 14 Feb 2022, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Washington Post? Has their reporting gotten more accurate since the Russian collusion debacle?
gird your loins....you can do it...
15 Feb 2022 5:48 am
For reasons you cannot explain.neueregel » 14 Feb 2022, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ The worst of my lifetime has been Carter and now Biden. Sleepy has time to turn it around. Losing Congress will help.
Only in your opinion, Ruby....and, by your own admission, you aren't very attentive.
Or partivcularly bright.
In the opinion of those much less not very bright than you, the worst are Scrub and Grifty, though not in that order.
15 Feb 2022 5:54 am
Uncovering and exposing the many titted empress' campaign's criminal role (and her part) in spying on Trump's campaign was not his mission. He was part of the insurrection to de-rail Trump's election. After that failed, then to overthrow his Presidency.neueregel » 14 Feb 2022, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑ We’ll see if Mueller’s house of cards stand once Durham gets done with him. Mueller investigates for years, spends millions of dollars and can’t uncover the Clinton campaign’ role in spying on the Trump
campaign?
Im sure WaPo is writing about it as we speak.
15 Feb 2022 6:00 am
Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ Where do you go to become so wise, Ruby?
gird your loins....you can do it...
why are you talking about someone else's loins dickhead?....what is it with your online underwear and loins fantasies...you need to get yourself some friends...or at least a dog
15 Feb 2022 6:01 am
Stop stalking, queer.nefarious101 » 15 Feb 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ why are you talking about someone else's loins dickhead?....what is it with your online underwear and loins fantasies...you need to get yourself some friends...or at least a dog
15 Feb 2022 6:03 am
Oh...now I'm queer because I won't talk about you in your underwear.....you are one **** up nutjob
15 Feb 2022 6:05 am
Why do you spend one second of your time even responding to this moron???nefarious101 » 15 Feb 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ why are you talking about someone else's loins dickhead?....what is it with your online underwear and loins fantasies...you need to get yourself some friends...or at least a dog
Put her on your Foes list and enjoy the peace that ignoring her ignorance brings. It's blissful actually!!!
Besides, watching her meltdown in abject silence from everyone is quite amusing actually when you know that without the attention she so much craves, she dies like fruit on the vine- ROTTEN!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Feb 2022 6:07 am
There wouldn't be any such talk, if you weren't such a fruit....or I weren't a demigod.nefarious101 » 15 Feb 2022, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Oh...now I'm queer because I won't talk about you in your underwear.....you are one **** up nutjob
15 Feb 2022 6:08 am
Bee, you little quim.Beekeeper » 15 Feb 2022, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you spend one second of your time even responding to this moron???
Put her on your Foes list and enjoy the peace that ignoring her ignorance brings. It's blissful actually!!!
Besides, watching her meltdown in abject silence from everyone is quite amusing actually when you know that without the attention she so much craves, she dies like fruit on the vine- ROTTEN!!
You were first to my thread last night.
:rofl:
15 Feb 2022 6:24 am
You say something, moron???Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ Blackvegetable, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
Fact is, you are in a place where I derive much pleasure from your silence!! You still can't seem to muster enough intelligence to get past these moron filters!
I guess I might need to lower the settings a bit more, huh?? Maybe you can get through then since without a doubt, you aren't trying very hard to get smarter!!
After all, you still are a loser Democrat.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Feb 2022 6:29 am
Beekeeper » 15 Feb 2022, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ You say something, moron???
Fact is, you are in a place where I derive much pleasure from your silence!! You still can't seem to muster enough intelligence to get past these moron filters!
I guess I might need to lower the settings a bit more, huh?? Maybe you can get through then since without a doubt, you aren't trying very hard to get smarter!!
After all, you still are a loser Democrat.
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=64588Beekeeper Yesterday, 8:09 pm
15 Feb 2022 6:38 am
Beekeeper » 15 Feb 2022, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you spend one second of your time even responding to this moron???
Put her on your Foes list and enjoy the peace that ignoring her ignorance brings. It's blissful actually!!!
Besides, watching her meltdown in abject silence from everyone is quite amusing actually when you know that without the attention she so much craves, she dies like fruit on the vine- ROTTEN!!
I never block anyone for any reason....that is a snowflake activity and I am not a snowflake
15 Feb 2022 6:39 am
Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ There wouldn't be any such talk, if you weren't such a fruit....or I weren't a demigod.
LOL....twice you used your new word..."demigod"....you are soooo predictable...even for a lowly dickhead
15 Feb 2022 6:54 am
nefarious101 » 15 Feb 2022, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ LOL....twice you used your new word..."demigod"....you are soooo predictable...even for a lowly dickhead
got naffy right in the G spot.
15 Feb 2022 7:15 am
Not the Washington Post, that’s for sure. Shame on you for using a source that knowingly spewed Russian propaganda for years.Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ Where do you go to become so wise, Ruby?
gird your loins....you can do it...
15 Feb 2022 7:23 am
To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.golfboy » 12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Now we're actually getting into it.
Durham has filed papers linking the Hillary campaign to illegal spying in/on the Trump campaign.
Tell me how this is different than Watergate.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?
15 Feb 2022 7:35 am
I didn't ask where you don't go.neueregel » 15 Feb 2022, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Not the Washington Post, that’s for sure. Shame on you for using a source that knowingly spewed Russian propaganda for years.
Please answer the question asked....you don't want to get a reputation, do you?
15 Feb 2022 7:41 am
Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after BEFORE Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians. The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers.AnnoyedLiberall » 15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?
In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel. When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client. His billable hours got him caught.
Edit.
Correction to the WH story sue to new information.
@Blackvegetable
@Annoyed Liberall
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
15 Feb 2022 7:45 am
It's the usual gaslight job.AnnoyedLiberall » 15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?
There's a reason it was dropped on Friday.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/p ... ussia.html
Who is online
In total there are 5323 users online :: 0 registered, 10 bots, and 5313 guests
Registered users:
Bots: CriteoBot, proximic, Nutch, NING, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7