Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.

 

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested.

We both know you didn't read the filing.


Don't be a coward, post your source.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:53 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested.

We both know you didn't read the filing.


Don't be a coward, post your source.
 

 

I read the linked article in the OP.  Apparently you didn't.  We are not turning this into another your "game of stupid".  

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:53 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested.

We both know you didn't read the filing.


Don't be a coward, post your source.
 

 

PS.  I never said I read the entire filing.  Stop acting like the Clinton Campaign by creating a false narrative. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:55 am

I read the linked article in the OP.  Apparently you didn't.  We are not turning this into another your "game of stupid".

Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.
 

ScottMon » 14 Feb 2022, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 8:48 pm

Peace with Russia because He ignored Putin's actions and left Biden to deal with the conflict.  Peace in the middle east because he didn't have the balls to pull out of Afghanistan. And the grocery store shortages started under Trump, not Biden.  and no.  he didn't secure the southern border.  his fence was worthless and imcomplete.

You really ARE an ignorant cretin, aren't you?  You think Trump did Putin's bidding by sending a huge array of defensive military weapons to Ukraine including $250 million worth of anti-tank missiles and other weapons?  And do you know who chose to STOP that shipment?  THE RUSSIA-LOVING ASSHOLE YOU VOTED FOR, while Biden ALSO paid for Russia's oil pipeline WITH YOUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS WHILE KILLING ANY CONSTRUCTION ON OUR OWN PIPELINES and stopping drilling and fracking wherever he could, which caused the huge spike in gas prices we're paying for now, all thanks to idiots like you!

And are you so dumb that you can remain completely clueless about how many billions of dollars it cost Russia when Trump opened up drilling and fracking here to make us energy independent and give AMERICANS gasoline at the low price of under $2 a gallon?  And now that Biden's put an end to all that, Russia is making BILLIONS more since Biden took office and doubled the price of gas for the world!  And why?  EASY!  Because his **** junkie son took MILLIONS in bribes funneled through the ex-mayor of Moscow's wife!

Hunter Biden received $3.5M wire transfer from Russian billionaire: Senate report
NY Post By Emily Jacobs September 23, 2020

Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the richest woman in Russia and the widow of Yury Luzhkov, the former mayor of Moscow, Senate Republicans revealed in their report on the younger Biden’s work in Ukraine.

Baturina is referenced in the 87-page report, which was released Wednesday, addressing her payment to Biden’s investment firm in early 2014.

“Baturina became Russia’s only female billionaire when her plastics company, Inteko, received a series of Moscow municipal contracts while her husband was mayor,” it said in providing background on the businesswoman.

The report described her involvement with Biden as “a financial relationship,” but declined to delve deeper into why the wire transfer was made.

The probe also found that Baturina sent 11 wires transfers between May and December 2015 to a bank account belonging to BAK USA, a tech startup that filed for bankruptcy in March 2019.

Finally, don't try to pass off that lie about Trump not pulling out of Afghanistan when he had laid out the complete withdrawal plans for doing so in his agreement with the Taliban WHICH KEPT THEM FROM KILLING A SINGLE AMERICAN OR ALLIE FOR 18 MONTHS THERE, until your demented idiot pulled ALL our troops out BEFORE getting our people out, allowing them to murder 13 American service men and abandoned HUNDREDS MORE there to be tortured and murdered!

 
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am

PS.  I never said I read the entire filing.  Stop acting like the Clinton Campaign by creating a false narrative.

Show where I used the word "entire", Reframy..

But it's moot.

You didn't read any of it.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:55 am

I read the linked article in the OP.  Apparently you didn't.  We are not turning this into another your "game of stupid".

Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.
 

 

It's not.  I have read a few sources.  You will do anything to divert from this issue.  We are done here. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.


 

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested. 

 

The ****, liberal idiots are not interested in the truth exposing their many titted empress, the dnc, and deep state swamp rats' corruption and fabrication of LIES about Trump/Russia.  
 

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am

You really ARE an ignorant cretin, aren't you?  You think Trump did Putin's bidding by sending a huge array of defensive military weapons to Ukraine including $250 million worth of anti-tank missiles and other weapons?  And do you know who chose to STOP that shipment?  THE RUSSIA-LOVING ASSHOLE YOU VOTED FOR, while Biden ALSO paid for Russia's oil pipeline WITH YOUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS WHILE KILLING ANY CONSTRUCTION ON OUR OWN PIPELINES and stopping drilling and fracking wherever he could, which caused the huge spike in gas prices we're paying for now, all thanks to idiots like you!

And are you so dumb that you can remain completely clueless about how many billions of dollars it cost Russia when Trump opened up drilling and fracking here to make us energy independent and give AMERICANS gasoline at the low price of under $2 a gallon?  And now that Biden's put an end to all that, Russia is making BILLIONS more since Biden took office and doubled the price of gas for the world!  And why?  EASY!  Because his **** junkie son took MILLIONS in bribes funneled through the ex-mayor of Moscow's wife!

Finally, don't try to pass off that lie about Trump not pulling out of Afghanistan when he had laid out the complete withdrawal plans for doing so in his agreement with the Taliban WHICH KEPT THEM FROM KILLING A SINGLE AMERICAN OR ALLIE FOR 18 MONTHS THERE, until your demented idiot pulled ALL our troops out BEFORE getting our people out, allowing them to murder 13 American service men and abandoned HUNDREDS MORE there to be tortured and murdered!

Zeets,

You're a **** idiot.


https://edition.cnn.com/factsfirst/poli ... 6d512c4e5e

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:59 am

It's not.  I have read a few sources.  You will do anything to divert from this issue.  We are done here.

#readhissig

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.
 

The actual filing - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 35.0_1.pdf

Buffalo » 15 Feb 2022, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:00 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.



 

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested. 


 

The ****, liberal idiots are not interested in the truth exposing their many titted empress, the dnc, and deep state swamp rats' corruption and fabrication of LIES about Trump/Russia.  
 

 

Basically they are in ignore it mode. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:03 am

#readhissig

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.

 Huey-16 minutes ago

I HATE YOU, BLACKVEGETABLE....I HATE YOU SOOOOO MUCH!
.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:32 am

Basically they are in ignore it mode.

No..

I asked you to provide the sources of your narrative, because it's cockeyed..

You shimmied, before admitting that you had read such, but won't identify them.

There's a reason this was dropped on a Friday night, and the Mazars announcement may be it...
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:39 am

No..

I asked you to provide the sources of your narrative, because it's cockeyed..

You shimmied, before admitting that you had read such, but won't identify them.

There's a reason this was dropped on a Friday night, and the Mazars announcement may be it...

Umm, I told you my source.  It is in the OP.   I didn't shimmy.

Instead of your ******* games just tell us why my narrative, based on the article in the OP, is cockeyed.  You won't because it is not.  If you could, you would have done so. 

 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:54 am

Umm, I told you my source.  It is in the OP.   I didn't shimmy.

Instead of your ******* games just tell us why my narrative, based on the article in the OP, is cockeyed.  You won't because it is not.  If you could, you would have done so.

Why must I do that because you won't identify the sources on which it is based?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:56 am

Why must I do that because you won't identify the sources on which it is based?

It is based on the article in the OP, ****.  I reread it before I typed it.  You ain't got ****, dude.  So you divert. You can keep yapping or you can  provide some content.
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:58 am

It is based on the article in the OP, ****.  I reread it before I typed it.  You ain't got ****, dude.  So you divert. You can keep yapping or you can  provide some content.

Dwarf insists his source is the OP


Dwarf acknowledges that he has also read other sources


Dwarf refuses to identify the sources informing his narrative

Dwarf demands that you fact check it

Dwarf returns to insisting that his source is the OP.



The caravan passes.