Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:01 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:58 am

It is based on the article in the OP, ****.  I reread it before I typed it.  You ain't got ****, dude.  So you divert. You can keep yapping or you can  provide some content.

Dwarf insists his source is the OP


Dwarf acknowledges that he has also read other sources


Dwarf refuses to identify the sources informing his narrative

Dwarf demands that you fact check it

Dwarf returns to insisting that his source is the OP.



The caravan passes.

 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 9:58 am

It is based on the article in the OP, ****.  I reread it before I typed it.  You ain't got ****, dude.  So you divert. You can keep yapping or you can  provide some content
 


 

It's not.  I have read a few sources.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:06 am

.Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:05 am

Nancy, you are the idiot who claims it is "cockeyed".  Nancy, you refuse to say why.  So until you do my post stands as accurate based on the article in the OP.

When the story first broke most "sources" were just using that article.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:07 am

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:07 am

Only AFTER I asked you for the sources you are too ashamed to name.

Name them and I will do my bit.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:35 am

I didn't ask where you don't go.

Please answer the question asked....you don't want to get a reputation, do you?

neueregel » 15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am

We've talked on this before and I'll answer now like I did then....I read many, many sources. To get a listing, pull up realclearpoltiics on any day. Those are the sources I read. Even if I read them, that doesn't necessarily mean I believe them...like WaPo, for the reasons stated earlier.

neueregel » 15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am

We've talked on this before and I'll answer now like I did then....I read many, many sources. To get a listing, pull up realclearpoltiics on any day. Those are the sources I read. Even if I read them, that doesn't necessarily mean I believe them...like WaPo, for the reasons stated earlier.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am

 

I did a google search when the story broke.  Yahoo used that article, I believe Business insider had one, and possibly Forbes.  All said pretty much the same thing. Over the weekend no traditional left wing media had an article. That narrative is based solely on the article in the OP.  

Now get to work or STFU.  mg:

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:20 am

More narrative....

Your rule.

Your original narrative is cockeyed.

It is.

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:56 am

You really ARE an ignorant cretin, aren't you?  You think Trump did Putin's bidding by sending a huge array of defensive military weapons to Ukraine including $250 million worth of anti-tank missiles and other weapons?  And do you know who chose to STOP that shipment?  THE RUSSIA-LOVING ASSHOLE YOU VOTED FOR, while Biden ALSO paid for Russia's oil pipeline WITH YOUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS WHILE KILLING ANY CONSTRUCTION ON OUR OWN PIPELINES and stopping drilling and fracking wherever he could, which caused the huge spike in gas prices we're paying for now, all thanks to idiots like you!

And are you so dumb that you can remain completely clueless about how many billions of dollars it cost Russia when Trump opened up drilling and fracking here to make us energy independent and give AMERICANS gasoline at the low price of under $2 a gallon?  And now that Biden's put an end to all that, Russia is making BILLIONS more since Biden took office and doubled the price of gas for the world!  And why?  EASY!  Because his **** junkie son took MILLIONS in bribes funneled through the ex-mayor of Moscow's wife!

Finally, don't try to pass off that lie about Trump not pulling out of Afghanistan when he had laid out the complete withdrawal plans for doing so in his agreement with the Taliban WHICH KEPT THEM FROM KILLING A SINGLE AMERICAN OR ALLIE FOR 18 MONTHS THERE, until your demented idiot pulled ALL our troops out BEFORE getting our people out, allowing them to murder 13 American service men and abandoned HUNDREDS MORE there to be tortured and murdered!

golfboy » 14 Feb 2022, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 9:12 pm

You claimed Trump ignored Putin's actions. 
I asked you to name those actions, you give me a link to a book, that doesn't do anything other than say Trump was nice to Putin. 

Why aren't Mexicans climbing that fence around the San Diego area, where it exists? 
Why are all the illegals going to Texas?   Because the fence works.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:30 am

No, the filing also supports my narrative.  Start with section 5 where it discuss DNS lookups.  

This all started with the lawyer lying about not representing anyone when they brought their false narrative to the agency.  There billable hours gave them away.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:38 am

Just post the **** links to your sources.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:41 am

My main source is the article in the OP.  My narrative is accurate.  I did not hear it on the radio.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:44 am

No one said anything about radio, Diverty..

Is there something you'd like to share?

But please, after the citations.

I have tried to find it on National Pulse.

AnnoyedLiberall » 15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am

To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?

In memory of Pumpkins

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:46 am

You have the source, nitwit.  

@neue regel   see how he works.

I have no other citations to give you.  Already explained to you.  You lose.