Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:18 am

Why not just answer.....uhhh....you know, honestly? You know how you feel about answering questions.

You are quite promiscuous in your commentary about sources used by others. but you don't want to subject your choices to any scrutiny...

Jantje_Smit » 15 Feb 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:47 am

 
Clinton campaign paid tech firm to link Trump to Russia – court filing

Lawyers working for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign paid an IT firm to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and the White House in order to establish a “narrative” that would link Donald Trump to Russia, an explosive new legal filing alleges.


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am

You post an entirely unsourced narrative.

I ask for your citations.

You lie.

Then you confess.

Then you lie.

Guess who's the bad guy..

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:50 am

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:46 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

I'd like to see a citation supporting the elements of this narrative.


 

It is in the OP.  Go read it.  IF you really would like to see it. There is also a copy of the court filing posted.  If you are really interested. 

 

ScottMon » 15 Feb 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:32 am

I need links, not angry rhetoric.  I can prove every word I said.  Can you?

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:51 am

I told you from the get go that narrative was based on the article in the OP.  Stop lying.  And you still can't say what is cockeyed about it.

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:05 am

ABSOLUTELY, you moron!  Why don't you tell me which statement I made that you're so ignorant about, and I'll HAPPILY support it with documentation and all the links you could hope for, just to prove what an uneducated imbecile you are?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:07 am

You haven't given me your **** citations.

# readhissig

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:05 am

ABSOLUTELY, you moron!  Why don't you tell me which statement I made that you're so ignorant about, and I'll HAPPILY support it with documentation and all the links you could hope for, just to prove what an uneducated imbecile you are?

Pengwin » 15 Feb 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:50 am

One slight problem - the Lawyer and the Exec say that didn't happen.

In memory of Pumpkins

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:08 am

Already addressed, meltdown boy.  I repost it.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am

 

I did a google search when the story broke.  Yahoo used that article, I believe Business insider had one, and possibly Forbes.  All said pretty much the same thing. Over the weekend no traditional left wing media had an article. That narrative is based solely on the article in the OP.  

Now get to work or STFU.  mg:

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:52 am

@Blackvegetable  ​​​​​​​

Jantje_Smit » 15 Feb 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:09 am

So they plead not guilty.....

Who cares, it will be a fun case... I wonder how that lawyer will explain his billing records...

 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:10 am

@Blackvegetable  

The narrative you falsely claim is cockeyed is based solely on the article used in the OP.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:11 am

Just post the answer to the question...

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:11 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:10 am

@Blackvegetable  

The narrative you falsely claim is cockeyed is based solely on the article used in the OP.

Just post the answer to the question...

 

 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:12 am

We are done.  You are unable to dispute my narrative concerning what the motion is about.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:15 am

We never started because you have YET to answer the FIRST question.

When you've done so I will do my bit.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:13 am

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinto ... se-servers