Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:16 am

You said you used other sources..

IN YOUR OWN WORDS>

I did not say I used other sources to write that narrative.  Stop lying.  I have reposted my words.  

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:17 am

I did not say I used other sources to write that narrative.  Stop lying.  I have reposted my words.
 


 

Grooooooooaaaan...


Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.

It's not.  I have read a few sources. 

#readhissig

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:26 am

Grooooooooaaaan...

Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.

#readhissig

And I posted what I said about those sources.  They were basically the same article, if not actually the same article.  But hey, there is nothing wrong with that narrative as it explains what the hub bub over the motion really is.  

My narrative stands. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:29 am

And I posted what I said about those sources.  They were basically the same article, if not actually the same article.  But hey, there is nothing wrong with that narrative as it explains what the hub bub over the motion really is.  

My narrative stands.

Please stop using narrative to qualify  your narratives...

Just post what you acknowledge are your other sources.

 

Pengwin » 15 Feb 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:10 am

He was digging up dirt on Trump.  Entirely legal.

Great, in that case he has nothing to worry about....

 


 

Jantje_Smit » 15 Feb 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:36 am

Great, in that case he has nothing to worry about....




 

After reading both filings, I agree.

Durham is dragging in an analysis of DNS that started under Obama looking at Russian hacking in America.

It continued under Trump but Clinton had no part of that, and the Campaign didn't pay for it either.

Pengwin » 15 Feb 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:46 am

After reading both filings, I agree.

Durham is dragging in an analysis of DNS that started under Obama looking at Russian hacking in America.

It continued under Trump but Clinton had no part of that, and the Campaign didn't pay for it either.

Yup.

Common sense would tell you that were this to implicate Hillary and unravel the sordid narrative of Grifty's work for Pootie, we'd have caught wind of it in less than 3 years.

There's a reason it was released late Friday...
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:31 am

Please stop using narrative to qualify  your narratives...

Just post what you acknowledge are your other sources.

Already done twice. 

Carry on. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:53 am

Already done twice. 

Carry on.

Always a sure sign you're lying, Tiny.


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:52 am

Pengwin » 15 Feb 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:46 am

After reading both filings, I agree.

Durham is dragging in an analysis of DNS that started under Obama looking at Russian hacking in America.

It continued under Trump but Clinton had no part of that, and the Campaign didn't pay for it either.

Yup.

Common sense would tell you that were this to implicate Hillary and unravel the sordid narrative of Grifty's work for Pootie, we'd have caught wind of it in less than 3 years.

There's a reason it was released late Friday...
 

 

Most news dumps like this are done on Friday.  So the weekend shows can discuss it or for the Admin to get ahead of what they know are talking about. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:55 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:53 am

Already done twice. 

Carry on.

Always a sure sign you're lying, Tiny.


 

 

Always a sure sign you do not read comments before responding.

You may have the last word as my narrative stands.  

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:57 am

Always a sure sign you do not read comments before responding.

You may have the last word as my narrative stands.

I've offered my narrative on your narrative.


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:52 am

Yup.

Common sense would tell you that were this to implicate Hillary and unravel the sordid narrative of Grifty's work for Pootie, we'd have caught wind of it in less than 3 years.

There's a reason it was released late Friday...

If you notice this is not the Bad Bobby investigation
which leaked all the time.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:56 am

Most news dumps like this are done on Friday.  So the weekend shows can discuss it or for the Admin to get ahead of what they know are talking about.

No...late friday is chosen because it leaves most major newspapers without resources or space to vet and address the issue.

Sources which are tipped off, and are prepared to run wild with the insinuations (like "infiltrated") enjoy 48 hrs to catapult an inaccurate framing of circumstances.

By then, Slack Jaw Nation KNOWS Hillary is bound for jail, and why.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:52 am

Yup.

Common sense would tell you that were this to implicate Hillary and unravel the sordid narrative of Grifty's work for Pootie, we'd have caught wind of it in less than 3 years.

There's a reason it was released late Friday...

Common sense tells me that you're a dickhead....

 


 
 
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm

If you notice this is not the Bad Bobby investigation
which leaked all the time.

I'm aware that is part of your TP list, but it is inaccurate.

You forget your complaints at the time about lack of results, Durham has been at it for 3 years.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:08 am

No.....Post your **** sources, Zeet...

in your **** ****....

I'll be happy to, as soon as you indicate your level of ignorance on which one you don't believe!
And I'll do so NOT because a dopey eggplant like you demands it, but because I want to further expose just how stupid a moron like you really is!

So give me one at a time, which statements you don't believe or shut the **** up and look them up for your dumb self!
 

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:31 pm

I'll be happy to, as soon as you indicate your level of ignorance on which one you don't believe!
And I'll do so NOT because a dopey eggplant like you demands it, but because I want to further expose just how stupid a moron like you really is!

So give me one at a time, which statements you don't believe or shut the **** up and look them up for your dumb self!

I'll be happy to, as soon as you indicate

Notice how everything is always conditioned on your readiness to go back through his outburst, sort out the most egregious example and present it for approval.

At which point the best you can hope for is another verbal tantrum.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:10 pm

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:56 am

Most news dumps like this are done on Friday.  So the weekend shows can discuss it or for the Admin to get ahead of what they know are talking about.

No...late friday is chosen because it leaves most major newspapers without resources or space to vet and address the issue.

Sources which are tipped off, and are prepared to run wild with the insinuations (like "infiltrated") enjoy 48 hrs to catapult an inaccurate framing of circumstances.

By then, Slack Jaw Nation KNOWS Hillary is bound for jail, and why.
 
 

 

Nah.  First, although I heard it about it Sat Morning because I was traveling Fri I did not post about it until yesterday.  48 hr rule type of thing.  Second, Clinton won't be touched unless she can be tied specifically to it.  And third, all we have is a filing.  No evidence has been brought forward yet.  And last, the reason for the filing was about a conflict of interest.  The "spying" was brought up in the factual background section which the lawyer is fighting.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:34 pm

Notice how everything is always conditioned on your readiness to go back through his outburst, sort out the most egregious example and present it for approval.

At which point the best you can hope for is another verbal tantrum.

If you're unaware of the facts I'm telling you, then state it!  What are you afraid of, ******?  Having your nose rubbed into your ignorance once again?  I'd think you'd have gotten tired of me doing that day after day!

And if you prefer not to be made an *** of when I do it, then shut the **** up, coward!